Are you referring specifically to the cloning of animals (cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer) or to farming and livestock practices in general? If the former, in what way is the production and farming of cloned animals any more “unnatural and detrimental” than traditional practices?
How? Be specific.
Please explain.
well, how do you think the quality of life for humans would change if we were to become a food source for another species?
i would really just rather not have another sentient being have to die before it's time in order for me to live.
given that, i'd be more inclined to eat an animal killed in the wild or their natural habitat, if i had to for sustenance, but i have the luxury of not having to.
i just don't feel comfortable about the quality of life that a lot of animals created for consumption today have, and i don't want to contribute to it.