Why Draqon needed banning. Poll

Discussion in 'About the Members' started by Captain Kremmen, Jun 8, 2010.

?

Which is the best reason for banning Draqon?

Poll closed Jun 18, 2010.
  1. He was a troll.

    2 vote(s)
    10.0%
  2. He hated Poles.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. He liked Mars too much.

    2 vote(s)
    10.0%
  4. He was misogynist.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. He displeased Plazma

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. He displeased the Mods

    1 vote(s)
    5.0%
  7. He posted too often.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. He was a big girl

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  9. He talked rubbish half the time

    7 vote(s)
    35.0%
  10. Banned? No way. Draqon was great. Get him back now.

    8 vote(s)
    40.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Captain Kremmen All aboard, me Hearties! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,738
    He's banned now.
    That must be right or it wouldn't have happened.
    All is done for the benefit of all on sciforums.

    Which of these was the best reason?
     
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2010
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. phlogistician Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,342
    I voted for 'he talked rubbish half the time' because there wasn't a 'Dragon was full of shit' option. Although I think most of those other boxes should get ticked also, all bar the last one. You missed off that he was a homophobe.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Captain Kremmen All aboard, me Hearties! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,738
    Oh No.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    How did I miss that one?
    I can't add it now. Damn.

    I voted for Draqon's return.
    I wonder which options Draqon's socks will vote for?
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    33,264
    If he annoyed people then all they needed do is put him on ignor.
     
  8. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    I am like kira, I don't understand why someone who wants to contribute to a free discussion forum should be permabanned. I don't like thought police.

    This song is dedicated to draqon:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_bvT-DGcWw
     
  9. phlogistician Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,342
    The only person I have on ignore is SAM. People have to sink that low before I'll use that function.
     
  10. Syzygys As a mother, I am telling you Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,671
    This forum is free as in "no fees" not as in "you can say anything you like" or "free of rules".

    Got it?
     
  11. visceral_instinct Monkey see, monkey denigrate Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,913
    All of them except the last one and 'He was a big girl'.

    Why is having two X chromos a term of abuse?? Motherfucker.
     
  12. Syzygys As a mother, I am telling you Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,671
    Annoying people is one thing, annoying the owners is another. Draq was pulling down the forum. I had to post twice as smart as I do usually just to keep the averages up...
     
  13. cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    33,264
    :spank:
     
  14. Lori_7 Go to church? I am the church! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,515
    you should put yourself on ignore then.
     
  15. Lori_7 Go to church? I am the church! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,515
    it's only a term of abuse if you're a guy.

    VI has me on ignore, but i still post to her anyway.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  16. CheskiChips Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,538
    I didn't see anything wrong with just periodically banning him for long periods of time. There are plenty of bigger trolls on the board which could be banned, some of which are even Mods. I kind of feel James R. is pretty much a troll outside of the scientific forums. Either the hand of justice should have been laid down uniformly or just allow him to continue talking rubbish all the time [which was what I voted for].
     
  17. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    Nothing is ever fair. The problem i see is that certain people are truly savants and they have been deluded by people telling them how smart they are because they can add some numbers but often times these same people are naive and some would say imbecile in other areas. Watch Rain Man. Not directing this towards Draqon.

    It is not much different than someone who can bake a really excellent cake and claiming because of that they MUST have high intellect. Well sure they are good at baking. I think this is very unfortunate and at the same time think Savantism is more widespread than people realize.
     
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2010
  18. glaucon tending tangentially Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502
    You forgot the option: he was a shit-disturbing misanthrope.
     
  19. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    I cant believe a mod would make a statement like that.
     
  20. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    I mean you, glaucon, have your good points and are not completely bad choice for a mod so i am not looking for a replacement.
     
  21. BenTheMan Dr. of Physics, Prof. of Love Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,967
    Seconded.

    We're not allowed to have opinions?
     
  22. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    I think you guys need to be more independent. If he was a 'shit-disturbing misanthrope' then so is everyone else.
     
  23. glaucon tending tangentially Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502
    Somehow being a Mod means I can't have a personal opinion???

    :



    Well, we call that a non sequitur. The point being, what you assert is not true of all members. There are many, if not indeed the vast majority of members here who represent themselves as mature individuals who enjoy engaging in respectful discussion. I include here a number of members that I happen to disagree with, on a number of serious positions. Nonetheless, I engage in discussion with them, and respect them.

    My point was, there is a vast difference to be found between the member whose opinion you happen to disagree with, but still manages to post in an effective manner, and the member whose sole purpose is to serve as a nuisance to all others.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page