Why do racists have low IQs?

Discussion in 'Science & Society' started by S.A.M., Oct 31, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Hmm so how do you explain this study?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Has anyone checked it recently?

    Brain Atrophy In Elderly Leads To Unintended Racism, Depression And Problem Gambling
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070921100332.htm

    Time to put the horse to pasture?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Sciencelovah Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,349
    If people have high IQs, for sure they won't be racist, because being racist
    creates enemy and that is not something beneficial. I tend to believe the
    more racist we are, the less friend or the more enemy you will have, because
    nobody likes to be racisted (ok, thats gotta be gramatically incorrect). Do
    you like to be working in team with a racist? :shrug:

    Intelligent one will believes that nobody can leave alone and therefore shall
    have some level of tolerance.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    lol
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Baron Max Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,053
    Interesting, Sam. When IQ tests show something that you don't believe in, you nay-say IQ tests, ...yet if the IQ tests show Watson's IQ as low, you'd love it, wouldn't you? ...LOL!

    Nope, the hatred must go on ....and in fact, we must keep fanning the flames of hatred until it leads to vast, ever-destructive, all-annihilating war!

    Baron Max
     
  8. francois Schwat? Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,515
    Yep, IQ is meaningless when indicating differences between races, but somehow (maybe by the will of Allah), it magically becomes an important again when it can be used for her political purposes. Incredible dishonesty.
     
  9. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Hmm so y'all believe that racists are dumber than average?
     
  10. Baron Max Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,053
    ...LOL! "Sam Tactics", huh? ...LOL!

    No one said anything like that or even implied it, Sam. Why are you trying to deflect comments from your own incredibly stupid earlier comment?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Baron Max
     
  11. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,855
    Perhaps, but can we see the graph indicating the relationship between theism and racism? There may be some similarities with the graph you presented.
     
  12. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    So do you believe it or don't you?

    And why are there more racists in the liberal arts and social sciences?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  13. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    That's kind of obvious isn't it ?
     
  14. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    It isn't to me.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  15. francois Schwat? Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,515
    I suspect racists are dumber than non-racists. But my suspicion has nothing to do with this thread. And I certainly never said or implied it before in this thread. Good job with the non-sequiturs by the way. Keep it up.
     
  16. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,855
    Gee sam, don't you think your graph needs updating?

    "Based on data from Allport (1946)"
     
  17. Grantywanty Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,888
     
  18. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Sure do you have data that conflicts with the available evidence?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Perhaps we could ask the Pioneer Fund to support the research?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_Fund
     
  19. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Natural sciences include biology.
     
  20. Baron Max Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,053
    Natural science is more interested in science, not sociology. I.e., people who study sciences aren't much interested in humans or sociology.

    Social Sciences would come into contact with the real world, the human prejudices and the racism and the hatred. So naturally they'd be more attuned to such things.

    Baron Max
     
  21. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,855
    Sam, did you know that although racism is "officially" rejected by both Christians and Muslims, those two groups are the most widespread promoters of racism?
     
  22. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    As you can see there are biologists who are racists too.

    Like the ones who were part of the eugenics research in the 1930s and who advanced the cause of race science in the United States

    So what does that mean?

    e.g.

     
  23. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Do they have lower IQs?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page