Where Are Huge Fossils Forming?

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience Archive' started by IceAgeCivilizations, Apr 28, 2007.

  1. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    What's the difference between if huge fossils or small fossils are forming? It's well known that fossilization of anything is rare.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    That avalanche material, with the bodies, will erode away in a century or so.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. matthyaouw Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    162
    You know that to be fact? What if the valley is aggrading? What about every other landslide in the world? Will they all erode within a century and how do you know this?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    Where are valleys supposedly aggrading into vast flat-lying sedimentary layers?
     
  8. NDS NDS Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,015
    With an old earth, fossilization of land animals would be extremely rare since landslides and mudholes entombing land animals in a sedimentary environment are extremely rare. Marine creatures, on the other hand, would have much better odds of being fossilized since they are always in a sedimentary environment.

    Predictably, only 1% of the fossil record is land creatures, and 99% are marine creatures.
     
  9. matthyaouw Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    162
    Did you have this aversion to researching and reading (and dare i say it; thinking) when you were getting your degree? It would sure explain how you don't seem to grasp ideas I learned in my first few geology lessons.
    These would not appear in the geological column as vast flat lying layers, but instead if preserved they would be found at an irregular unconformity representing a buried landscape. you seem to have nicely ignored my statements that deposition occur quickly in deserts, deltas, and floodplains etc. Do you deny that creatures could be buried here?
     
  10. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    Just keep the insults to yourself.
     
  11. matthyaouw Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    162
    Again:
    you seem to have nicely ignored my statements that deposition occur quickly in deserts, deltas, and floodplains etc. Do you deny that creatures could be buried here?
     
  12. GeoffP Caput gerat lupinum Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,087
    Nice.

    Will it? Or will it accumulate soil through the interception of wind and water erosion and become buried?
     
  13. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    Large animals are not becoming fossils in deltas, deserts, or floodplains, they die, then rot and degrade by various agents, and within a matter of weeks, there's no sign of the creature.
     
  14. GeoffP Caput gerat lupinum Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,087
    Right. Because there's no evidence of, say, native remains from as little as a few thousand years ago, or even a hundred years ago. The remains of lost campers are never, ever found. Never. 0%.

    Sure.

    Not.
     
  15. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    Oh sure, and processes today are causing the fossil record which we see, yeh right.
     
  16. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    Hey Geoff, when was the last time the oceans were up on the continents?
     
  17. matthyaouw Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    162
    I trust that you have spent many a year following the progress of any and all animal corpses to have fallen in each of those environments? Because unless you have your statement is absolutely useless.

    A quick question- How is it that an animal can become buried in your global flood, and yet you seem to think that this is impossible in a large regional or small local flood?
     
  18. GeoffP Caput gerat lupinum Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,087
    OMG - you just don't get it, do you? Missing remains never occur. Everything liquifies. Right? There are no remains of dinosaurs, no bones even to begin with. No remains of Native Americans that weren't buried. All a trick of the Devil, right? Sure.

    OK, I call troll.
     
  19. matthyaouw Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    162
    Do you know that large areas of continental crust are under the ocean and accumulating sediment as we speak? Look at the North Sea for instance.
     
  20. GeoffP Caput gerat lupinum Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,087
    Ha! Nice one.
     
  21. GeoffP Caput gerat lupinum Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,087
    Well, lemme see. About 75 million years ago, they were in Kansas.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    This is pretty obvious from all the skeletons with flippers there - mosasaurs, fish, turtles and the like. There were other points, of course, but that'll do for a start.
     
  22. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    To have large creatures and billions of smaller ones entombed in often vast sedimentary layers, they need to have been entombed in wet sediments, then the water must have drained fairly quickly, with the sediments cementing soon thereafter.

    The Deluge explains the deposition, and the CaCO3 in the Deluge water was the cementing agent.
     
  23. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    GeoffP, at "75 million years ago," assuming a constant erosion rate through that alleged time, the continents should have eroded to sea level five times over. Your sense of time and reality are horribly skewed.
     

Share This Page