If inscriptions on one side of a tile had Ramses II pictures and Greek lettering on the other side where the lettering did not exist until -700 or later, your documented battle history ibn 1273 must be sewriously reviewed, critically.
Physical evidence for...? Not a world-wide fllood. Presumably you mean Sitchin? Even more of a crank than Velikovsky. Agreed. Which explains the fact that the Babylonians didn't actually know about all of the planets. Which would depend greatly on your definition of "rational" and what you consider to be "possible". Hearsay rules therefore it's not admissible? Run that by me again. I merely picked one from the Google list. I haven't read it myself. Note the word in bold. This comes down to reliability of sources (and interpretation by them). In other words the original contention is not proven. No I'm not. I'm questioning the veracity/ actuality of the original supposition. One (secondary) source claims (actually is claimed by V) that particular date. How reliable is that source? Has it been verified?