Discussion in 'Linguistics' started by rcscwc, Oct 24, 2013.
Great analysis. I love it. I love Tolkien.
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
Do you mean the Anglo-Saxon invaders from whom the name Anglisc is derived, or the original Brythonic people, who were Celts?
Why not? There were plenty of Indians in South Africa. Gandhi himself lived there at the beginning of the 20th century, fighting for the rights of the Africans.
One thing about the British Commonwealth: If you were a citizen, you could travel to any part of it freely. Quite a few Chinese took advantage of that and emigrated to Canada right before the lease on Hong Kong expired.
Speak for yourself. I found them charming. So did Mrs. Fraggle, who has an M.A. in English literature.
I wept when it ended, when the world became round and all the magic drifted off into space on a straight line. Me, the rational scientist.
I'm not sure I ever want to visit England. I'd like to believe that the Shire is still there, somewhere. (Fortunately, the Hundred Acre Wood from "Winnie the Pooh" is well preserved.)
Some members have objected like : Tolkien is not known to have visited India.
Is it necessary to visit to pick Indian influences? Max Muller NEVER ever visited India, but he definitely had a deep knowledge of ancient Indian literature at large.
The parallels I have pointed out cannot be dismissed easily.
...and you know damn well that really doesn't matter, in terms of the "image" Tolkein wrote from.
Yazata's comment about the "early" English doesn't mean a damned thing. You can go to an isolated village in England even today and see the Sackville-Bagginses running around being important, and old Hamfast Gamgee leaning over his fence watching everything going on with a pipe in his mouth.
It doesn't have anything to do with "early".
It's still there.
Although perhaps not for much longer.
Is this true? And if so what region exactly are you talking about? It would be interesting to know if life goes on there today as it did when Tolkien visited, and whether the people there are aware that the hobbits are modeled on them.
It's true that Tolkien visited Kentucky as a young man, and the people he saw there were as described.
The hill country. Which counties I don't know.
No. They have cars and television sets and shoes and Walmarts now. Also the internet, which has hit the isolated regions of America the way whiskey hit the Red towns in the 1700s
Nobody has ever known where hobbits came from, including Tolkien. If he did model them on Kentucky hillbillies, he left out some stuff - those were the people who invented the long rifle, the felling axe, dynamite fishing (replaced poison fishing), moonshine from maize, the log cabin with rifle slits in the window shutters, the term "redskin", and the feud. And, rumor hath it, the toothbrush.
The feud is what you get when you import a Scottish clan conflict modified by Irish civil war to a lawless wilderness, and arm its factions with good rifles.
They are almost perfectly paced and structured for reading aloud - which is when you notice such stuff as Merry and Pippen not being interchangeable personalities, among other aspects partly hidden by soundless and over-rapid modern reading. Also, they have content for almost any age listener.
Thanks for that, iceaura. I should have guessed that Tolkien's hobbits were idealized whomever they were based on, and that simple hill folk of the 1930's would be Walmartized and Internetized by 2014. As for the toothbrush, I am fairly certain the Chinese must be given the credit for that.
The origin of the term Redskin is not at all clear. But the one that is strongly suggested in most discussions is the practice of several Native American tribes (notably the Beothuk people of Newfoundland, which is nowhere near Kentucky) who painted their bodies with red ochre simply as decoration.
Interestingly, neither the American colonists, the people of the United States, nor any other cultures of European origin thought the Native Americans had "red" skins until rather recently. Many people casually thought their skin is about the same color as ours (having spent most of my life in the West, I'd have to agree), and almost universally referred to them by Columbus's mistaken ethnonym, "Indians." "Redskin" pops up in the mid-19th century and was, of course, emphasized in the 20th century by Hollywood movies.
Feuds have been going on for centuries before any Europeans set foot in the Western Hemisphere. I'm not an expert on the subject, but from the casual references I've come across, they seem to be a time-honored custom in many Muslim communities. They are so common in 21st-century Albania (a rather secular Muslim country) that the government is powerless to do anything about it... or perhaps doesn't care. It has been argued that the centuries-old rivalry between the Sunni and Shiah Muslims, which turns violent at almost regular intervals and is roiling the Middle East today (particularly in Iraq and Syria), is a feud over who was the rightful heir of Mohammed. This goes back to the time when the first Irish explorers sailed to the northern part of Britannia, displaced the Picts, and established a new colony which was eventually named "Scotland." Scoti is simply the Latin name for the Gaelic people.
The first toothbrushes were invented in China during the Tang Dynasty, which ended in the 10th century. They used boar bristles.
- and using boar bristles would have upset the Shiahs and Sunnis equally, I suppose.
You're thinking clan war or sectarian conflict or intertribal stuff, something like that. For a proper feud you have to have whiskey and rifles, and intratribal disputation: same race, religion, ethnicity, economic class, social status, food, clothing, weapons, and possibly grandfathers.
And mosquito repellent.
The hill people Tolkien encountered in Kentucky were (and are) by no means confined to that that State, but are found the length and breadth of the eastern mountains and various points west. They pioneered the country, the shock troops of Western civilization north of the Rio Grande - which is why most posters here live in a county.
The people we now think of as hillbillies and rednecks were in the early days apparentlythought of by their betters - and referred to - as a sort of tribe, like the Cherokee, only with white skin. Benjamin Franklin referred to them as "white savages". The general skin tone difference was at any rate obvious to pretty much everyone, from first contact.
You're thinking of the teethbrush.
Sorry, old joke about hill folk.
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I don't get it.
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
kentucky didn't invent moon shine
This is rubbish.
I seem to be the only one here who has actually read a biography of Tolkien,
and I can promise it did not mention any visit to Kentucky. Tolkien spent the
first part of his young adulthood as a university student, proposed to his future
wife as soon as legal adulthood freed him to, served in the army during WWI,
was invalided home, and returned to professional academic life where he remained
until he retired. I do recall any mention of a visit to the USA.
Jesus. Jesus H. Christ.
Did these hillbillies have hair on the soles of their feet, or only on the palms
of their hands like you do?
I don't understand your anger. I don't mean to use the inane, 'you can't prove he didn't' argument; however, it really could be that a trip to Kentucky wasn't mentioned in his biography. Perhaps his biographer did not make the association between hillbillies and hobbits.
Returning to the OP: are there any hillbillies in India?
Here's a couple of candidates:
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Jethro is rather dusky here, and I believe his name does have Sanskrit origins.
That is because you do not know enough about the subject to be offended by
what could only have originated as an outright lie. Lies piss me off, and gullibility
pisses me off, don't they you?
It occurs to me, in fact, that this Kentucky hillbilly bullshit is a clumsy attempt
at caricature of OP. In which case I ought to be pissed off at myself, but I can
live with that- it's happened before.
I can come close enough to proof by observing that JRRT had no motivation for
making such a trip, and that such a trip would have been an event so noteworthy
that no biographer could conceivably have omitted it.
There is no association to be made.
Lord o' them fried onion rings. No-nonsense Kentucky version.
Gandalf an Frodo sat down an had a good meal.
Of guess what?
Kentucky Fraad chicken, that's what.
Then they fell ter sleepin an were killed bar Orc thangs.
Folks with baldy heads an nasty pointy teeth, lark sumthin they tol you about in Barble school.
Separate names with a comma.