Discussion in 'Chemistry' started by Reiku, Jun 27, 2008.
But i challenge it depends on the ratio-mass of whatever age the person we are talking about....
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
No. It seems to be something entwined as a culture here in Scotland, and i very much doubt it hasn't happened in other countries either...
And if you think i am talking shit about all this, these things do actually happen:
Pink (Female Celebrity Smoking List)Pink laughs, 'My mom caught me with a pack of cigarettes when I was in the seventh grade. She made me smoke the whole packet in front of her, thinking that ...
smokingsides.com/asfs/P/Pink.html - Similar pages
Reiku, if you are a scientist, you can't assume. You have to have proof. Just because you heard of it happening doesn't mean it did. And it definitely doesn't mean its happening worldwide. :bugeye:
I agree, somewhat... but remember, a scientist first needs to assume whether the evidence seems plausible... which... in my opinion... tends to fall as a serious ratio to consider.
For instance, what if P-210 poisening through protien-1 mechanism where it's air-born chemicals effects the breathing of a very young child... may this indicate a mechanism of cot-death, because if i remember correctly, the mechanism of cot-death has not been proven.
Show me an example of a child dying from such exposure.
So, er.. how many cigarettes can the caring parent force the child to safely smoke? Pink's mam forced her to smoke a pack of 20 once - and look how she turned out!
Reiku says that seven packs in one go is the danger level, but I suspect that it's lower than this.
Basically I think if you're making your child smoke more than, say, six packs a day... you're guilty of child abuse. Anything less than that though is probably ok.
I will implore a mod to allow me to re-start this thread, without the flaming this time...?
Why? It's great as it is.
Why? Even excusing your initial mistake about Po/Pu, the rest of what you tried to insert as proof was just nonsense.
You never even told us what "scientists" thought that we had adapted to being zapped with radiation.
''Those who haven't made an error, have not lived.''
ps. Act your age, not your shoe-size
I agree with uncle Albert. And you should take your own advice - it might make you look considerably less of a fool.
The thing about "redoing" this thread is that you have no substance to present - so why subject everyone to the same nonsense over again???
Separate names with a comma.