unacceptable behavior in a poster

I do indeed read your posts, Tiassa, close as they approach to the living death. Here's an honest answer back at you:

Do you really think that when you implicate me in supposed forum-wide problems - and simultaneously damn me with yet more slander - that I give a flying fuck about your fallacious approach to what you purport to be the finer issues?​

So you'll use me as an offensive example, but I should take no offense from that. "Here is a vile man; doth not our forum reek from his vileness? But take no offense, peon. I stand on your head merely that I may see more clearly." Idiotic. No, really: idiotic. Use another example - maybe one that makes sense, even - and do unto others what you claim they don't unto you: READ THEIR POSTS.

This has gone beyond the borders of the ridiculous. Why are you still an admin?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

And there's our answer

Actually, what your answer tells me is that you're simply ranting egotistically without the slightest clue what's actually going on.

I'm an admin?

• • •​

Nope. He justs wants it to be.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Could your position be more at odds with existence?

Actually, your answer tells me you've dissociated completely with reality. You really don't understand that by making me an implicit example - which everyone else seems to have picked up on - you are engaging in exactly the kind of behaviour you claim to abhor? And you expect me to just let this slide? Or even that anyone should believe you? Examples:

- Directed at myself. Unless some other poster were accused of making up dishonest definitions of words to satisfy...no idea, something in your own psyche, I guess.

- Same. I suppose it could have been anyone else, if only they fit your biased description of events. There must be dozens on the site, surely.

Quadraphonics picked up on this: the passive-aggressive bag is getting pretty old. It's not even good passive-aggressive. Must we honestly endure this simpleton act? To what end? This is like pissing on my leg under the pretense of trying to determine the constituents of piss. I appreciate that you don't get what it's about, or don't care: it's not happening to you, so why would you? Yes, everyone gets the way your narrative works.

If I pretended for a moment that none of the above had occurred: I appreciate that you have a beef with James. I get that you don't like where the forum is. That would even almost be laudible, coming from a different source. But choose a different false example. Very simple.

According to the site, yes. I know: I, too, was shocked by the implication.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

(chortle!)

You still fail to demonstrate any understanding of what's actually going on.

They really should send me the memo.

How did the site inform you that I'm an admin?

 

No: as my post demonstrates, I've got it to a tee. Again: choose some different fallacious examples. You're like Sam with ADD.

Please: this isn't about you.

 

So, a related quote from a related thread (now-locked, sorry for the... necromancy? Cross-contamination?):

Understandable enough. But it seems that there are certain contexts - and that this forum is one of them - wherein such a desire is at odds with the desire to actually not be biased to begin with. I.e., certain of the people who would accuse you of bias, are not doing so in good faith. Which is to say that, if you want to run a genuinely unbiased forum, you should want to be accused of certain forms of bias by certain accusers.

Even if we limit the question to those we are confident are speaking in good faith, it may be that what one should avoid is consistently being accused of any particular bias. I wouldn't be particularly bothered by repeated accusations of bias, provided they don't add up coherently. That would just mean that we have a group of vocal complainers with certain narrow perspectives. Of course a difficulty there is in equalizing for the differeing levels of vocalism (is that a word) in different quarters.

 

(Thpbpbpbpbpbpbpbpbt!)

I figured you would refuse to answer the question. Of course, that's the point. You can't:

"According to the site, yes. I know: I, too, was shocked by the implication."​

You lied. Then again, that's not surprising.

I'm not an admin, and I never have been.

However, we do come back to the question of how to respond to you, since you have no idea what's actually going on.

 

So sorry: "Supermoderator".

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Do continue to harp on it though; I enjoyed your taste of desperation as you scented evidence of an even higher personal authority.

Why start to engage now in a question you had no real interest in being factual about anyway? If you rope-a-dope long enough, maybe I'll lose interest.

 

Tiassa, I'm shocked.
On that link Geoffp just made, it says you come from a Brothel in Washington.

 

I think you mean Bother, Washington.

 

In that example is Geoffp supposed to be the Turd or the Footpath?

 

What's a matter Bells, you got no sense of humor at all???

 

Sorry to hear that.

Hopefully tomorrow will be a better day.

Arthur

 

Kinda, yeah. I was pointing out an actual bigot, who I didn't think you'd denounce. And you didn't, so more fool me, I guess.

No. You see, you still don't get this. I didn't know you were sick, and I told you that I hoped you got better, and reiterated my point that I just didn't like being attacked for shit I hadn't done. That was it. Maybe I was too hard on you, and maybe I should have just let you win your rant. Maybe that would have been the nice thing to do. But what's that really mean here: "Bells, you're sick, so I'm really everything you allege?" Well, the hell with that.

No: you don't get it. Tiassa doesn't get it. Maybe neither of you ever will. When my name is dragged - dragged, mind you, not introduced by me - into a long screed as an example of bigoted evil posters and how Tiassa would slay them if only the administration would let him - then it is about me. It's a tacit, oblique assertion of point A based on fact B - except that fact B is wrong, so far as can be inferred from the examples given, and fact B is based on me. How is Tiassa's assertion then in any way valid where it coincides with me? "Shut up, example: you're just an unwitting example." What, seriously?

So I don't care what your mod problems are, or if the War in Heaven is going badly for you: if you drag my name into the dirt, I will fuck back with you. And if the issue isn't about me, pick some different examples. There should be tons that don't involve me, if the problem is so ball-smackingly vast. Because this problem isn't about me. Right?

 

By the by, Bells: will this then be the fourth time you have asked me not to speak to you? Am I allowed to speak back to you? When are we on hiatus again?