Translational Motion of Black Hole

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by RajeshTrivedi, Jun 6, 2015.

  1. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,206
    Hmmm......brucep such the intellectual , NOT
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. brucep Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,098
    Quit trolling nonsense river. That's the extent of your participation in these attempts at discussion on topics of science. Goo for brains. Plasma goo.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,206
    As I said above in post #141
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. RajeshTrivedi Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,366
    Take Psychiatric help, it is beyond your control. Whatever you are writing is out of some kind of mental problem, and hence not being attributed to you in person...

    And do not be under delusion that you can be anybody's employer, possibly not beyond some mechanic.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2015
  8. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225
     
  9. Bruinthor Registered Member

    Messages:
    37
    The presence a singularity is sufficient to determine the behavior of a function. For example:

    f[x]=1/(x^2+a^2)

    has singularities ate +&- Sqrt[-1]a. Real valued x can not reach the singularities but their presence can be said to determine the behavior of the function for all x.

    For a 'physically accessible point' to be influenced by a singularity in the manifold it does not necessarily have to be causally connected to the it just analytically connected.

    If this seems to violate causality it is probably because some of the boundary conditions have been neglected.
     

Share This Page