I have come up with an idea and it's totally up to those who are opposing my view of time. We can make a very strict, intelligible debate based on a set of rules. Those rules are, no insulting, no baiting... no intentional acts of ''stupidisms'' or ignorance because you can't understand an article that is presented to you. Now... show me what you have to prove time is a real thing in nature... in a compact form... not something scattered over a lengthy set of posts.... just post your assertions and I will address them, so show me the same courtesy by giving me time to present my evidence. This will rely on some responsibility from the posters who make their claims, as showing a working understanding of why your proposals out-rank mine. Ok? Let's start! I will give you three days to gather your evidence for the case of time.