This History Will Be

Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by JJM, Mar 28, 2014.

  1. JJM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    329
    Why is it every time one sees any reference to bb that it is shown as expansion within and by a cone?...... (1/bb)*n @ and within (1'/1*n)N. ...... Since I don't always have access to a computer, I have difficulty in communicating. So you must bear with me.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,997
    Because showing a layered ball would be difficult. The cone represents a section of the ball/globe/roundness.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. JJM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    329
    Sir, Mr. Gawdzilla Sama, May I first suggest that you refrain from going to NYC and the Brooklyn bridge. The inverse g r^2 law is beautiful naturally, and is shown throughout Nature, I also appreciate what it means for ftl. Obviously mechanically it means to accelerate 'large cross sections' to relativistic velocities.It would be exciting if instead of large cross sections, but small cross sections but at super ultra relativistic mass which would be much more manageable within the device. By controlling the amount of mass per quadrant gives it a direction, by attracting behind the device it produces a deceleration. Place the most mass at any point 360^2 and the machine will go there. However, were anyone to do what I just wrote about with out the rest of it, they would experience spallation. One will gain motion, but when attempting ftl the machine and it occupant would become atomized.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,997
    Too early for word salad.
     
  8. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,410
    only to the living
    once you are dead your morals are somwhat useless
    thus subjective reality of purported moralistic propositional reality.

    unles you live many times longer than humans and thus conceptualise a proportion of moral judgement over a species to individuate the moral compass at zero to the individual... ?
    ... in which case maybe you need to make a new word for it.
     
  9. JJM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    329
    Qcd, qed, can that 'style's' apply to 'strings'? Is there a 'communications' between 'strings'? Is there a color and flavor, relative to where the 'string' is formed, ie. environmental geometry and style. Pressure density reliant. Differences in pressure density may produce differences in 'string' properties, similar to but not the same as. 1. The spacial area has background and foreground emr fields, embedded in space-time as a property of formation at the same time as the strings formed. Oscillations between 'strings' must cover the distance between each other, for each others communication through the emr space of the emr. Since emr is not the only field then the incision of its first order must be the pressure density fields and waves, within the field and between the fields. Can the oscillation be the transmission messenger from one 'string' to the other? that produces transverse waves(?) within the emr and density fields. While at the same time the oscillations may produce locality of diversity, ie. geometrical emr and g density style that 'amass' around the 'string'. The 'string' from its' formation vibrating the emr and g field density, while also being vibrated by them and in them by the compression pressure density 2. I am making the assumption that bb mass is the center of a huge collision, and that collision has exactingly specific geometry, stylistically. and that as a part of the geometry, 'strings' form. Since there evolves differences in the evolving geometry/style, differing densities exist within the geometrical structure, therefore, differences in 'color- flavor'. 3. Color and flavor and mass per volume area of 'strings' may be embedded as a part of the geometry. Different totals per environment locations.......Now all of that is a background for the evolution of states as collisions, frictions, motions as compressed compression pressure densities, (dm) from the geometrical styles from and of the background collision, 'squeeze' the background 'strings' in the foreground. The 'strings' being compressed within its own environmental background emr and g density have an instantaneity of compression and transformation going through its' cycle to 'grb'. The differing strengths of some grbs may be due to volumetric string styles, compressing and evolving........As for the fuel for ftl, ???? is it possible to use emr within emr for 'mass' formation? After all it is bulky to have the machinery to accelerate +_0v mass to .99999999 etc./ c. That would mean an emr inertial mass of I^4. With mostly unlimited velocity, ergo unlimited 'mass', ergo very, very 'fast'......... Remember neither Sir Issac or Albert knew any thing about bb, dm, bh, de, or compressed compression pressure density as gravity density, but Sir Issac certainty was closer to it. Though some may argue that gr answers that question, one should remember that a collision, friction, motion produces its' own space for the forming gravity density at that location. Forms it and maintains it.
     
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2018
  10. JJM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    329
    Duality. Particle-wave. Wave-particle. Can I^4)^....n ke f pressure density exist by duality for (as) gravity density.? for (mechanical I^4)(natural I^4)'/r^2]G. It certainly would be nice, then measurement. And ftl as a first order by-product. Ftl is the measurement of mm'/r^2]G.
     
    Last edited: May 27, 2018
  11. JJM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    329
    I understand that strings is basically a 'maybe-mathematical' existent. I must say in every compression, strain-stress resonances exist.
     
  12. JJM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    329
    Every compression has strings at ~10-35, whether a snowflake flying through the air, or bb. You create strings every time you walk. You create strings at every style of compression. Move. Clap your hands......Which brings me to another event that I am finally upset at. Some acquaint gravity with motion only. Motion is only one small part of force which is gravity density. It is the compression of and from collision, friction and motion which creates and is gravity density. add this to the laws of Sir Issac and Ae.
     

Share This Page