The true perpetual motion machines

most people on this thread. hate. make fun. same thing. maybe.

they do, tesla made some, but there's nothing strange about them since they just draw energy from the space/ethers around us.

http://www.t0.or.at/tesla/tesfreee.htm
http://free-energy.ws/tesla.html

an ordinary magnet actually gives free energy. if you have two magnets, and put them close enough, they'll move together by themselves. it's free energy.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

tesla made perpetual motion machines?
can you give an example?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

it sounds like it's free energy but it isn't.
it takes energy to seperate the magnets

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

he made a free energy receiver, which is the same thing.

it takes no energy for them to unite.

 

Umm... correct me if I am wrong it takes energy to cause an attraction in the first place?

 

I don't think today's physicists know the cause of attraction, but it takes no energy to cause an attraction. Infact, you can take a magnet and rub it against metallic objects, and they'll become magnets, yet the first magnet's attraction is no weaker than before. This is because a magnet's force does not come from the magnet itself, but it draws the force from the space around us. All things are a kind of magnets.

It's the energy of space which keeps things separate, like planets and stars, and space is the cause of the incredible speeds of objects in the universe. It is the cause of everything, even matter.

 

i never heard of a free energy receiver. what is it?

 

but it takes energy to seperate them

two magnets moving toward each other is not perpetual motion.

 

I think I read in my physics book that it could be caused by the spinning of electrons. Give me some time to dig it up and I will get back to you on that

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Physics book knows everything. Research is shut down. Dig. Get back.

 

I said COULD, not "DOES KNOW"

 

CANGAS has a problem with modern physics.

Right, I recall when you said you were researching into "absolute space" as a model for the universe.

 

http://www.t0.or.at/tesla/tesfreee.htm

what does it matter? or... does it really take energy? what kind of energy?

i didn't say that either. i said that it's free energy. motion is possible in the universe without using any energy. with magnets, for someone with knowledge, it would probably also be pretty easy to create a perpetual motion machine.

 

interesting.
tesla was a genius there is no doubt.
some of his work is still classified as military secrets.
some more of his work has been used in reagans "star wars" defense initiative also known as SDI.
as to the link this is the first i heard of something like this.

 

if two magnets are stuck together it take energy to seperate them

example
you grab one magner in your left hand, the other in your right hand
the magnetic attraction takes energy to move the magnets apart.

 

but isn't human energy also free energy?

 

No, humans need food.

 

For one thing, magnets are made, not found floating in space a convenient distance apart so the miniscule amount of energy that could be harnessed by their attractice force could be utilised. So you have to factor the energy of making them, and them bringing them into proximity, which would be many, many times any output.

Nope, 'someone with knowledge' would know that this violates the laws of physics. No system is perfect, and energy fields are conservative. Perpetual motion is impossible.

 

yea, but you have to go deeper and ask the next question: does food need energy to be. what kind of energy? etc. you have to solve the question: why does the universe exist? the universe exists, so 'energy' must have been created from nothingness.

it only violates the laws of certain narrow-minded physicists.

the universe is kind of.

 

I am reminded of another "free energy" device, a propeller on a car that generates "free lectricity" when the car moves..... Then the guy told me that the only reason the propeller is not a part of all cars is the GM/Ford conspiracy.

I think that perpetual motion machine is not possible, because i believe college physics and conservation of energy/matter theories.

But, i also believe that pseudo perpetual motion is possible, like a fuel cell powered device, where the fuel cell works off micro fusion/fission reactions. This would get its energy from nuclear forces (vast amounts available) and appear to be perpetual cause it runs for decades.