The Thing about UFOs...

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience Archive' started by EndLightEnd, Aug 21, 2008.

?

Origin of UFOs

  1. Extraterrestrials

    10 vote(s)
    20.0%
  2. Man-made

    10 vote(s)
    20.0%
  3. Both

    21 vote(s)
    42.0%
  4. Neither

    9 vote(s)
    18.0%
  1. EndLightEnd This too shall pass. Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,301
    Ok if you have any common sense then you realize that UFOs are real and are everywhere. Thousands of sightings every year now from the common laymen to highly experienced pilots to astronauts.

    1.) These are extraterrestrial in nature.
    OR
    2.) They are man-made technology and our govt has been lying for decades.

    Take your pick, but you must choose (both if you want). This can no longer just be ignored.
    Think about it and REALIZE the consequences of this seemingly simple choice.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,125
    What about the many other options you've not presented? Why must we choose between two very silly options when so many more are available?

    You clearly have no common sense.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    33,264
    And yet not one piece of actual hard, physical evidence exists. Isn't that odd?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. EndLightEnd This too shall pass. Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,301
    What other options are there then? Youve not presented any.
     
  8. kenworth dude...**** it,lets go bowling Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,034
    there are thousands of other options

    for example: someone got a small piece of cake in their eye
     
  9. kenworth dude...**** it,lets go bowling Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,034
    belief in ufo's and belief in exterterrestial life are completely different things.
    one streches credibility to incredible lengths the other is fairly reasonable.
     
  10. Nonsense Non doesn't make sense. Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    200
    Moving my post here:

    I recently went to a conference with the director of NASA's JPL. He simply said that he does not believe in UFOs. However he did add that this not mean that the possibility of intelligent life somewhere else is null.

    I really don't feel like writing verbatim his reasoning, go find a video of him at the World Affairs Council and hear it for yourself.
     
  11. EndLightEnd This too shall pass. Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,301
    Ok what about the mass ufo sightings then? I agree there is no hard evidence, this is in part the governments fault. There are only videos and testimonies but this IS good enough for me considering the sheer number of sightings and these people are CHANGED afterwards.

    Some articles on mass sightings.

    http://www.ufoevidence.org/GeneralSightings.htm

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-470579/UFO-sightings-bring-town-standstill.html

    http://www.rense.com/ufo/battleofla.htm

    Swamp gas refracting off Venus right?
     
  12. Read-Only Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,296
    I'll give you one - and the reason I haven't voted in your silly poll is because it's not there and it's the ONLY choice I'd accept: a combination of man-made and natural phenomenon.
    Of course UFOs are real - there are lots of things seen that aren't identified. But to carry it to YOUR illogical conclusion with no evidence whatsoever is pretty brainless.
     
  13. EndLightEnd This too shall pass. Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,301
    My evidence is the testimonies of THOUSANDS of people.

    Testimonies are good in court, arent they?
     
  14. Nonsense Non doesn't make sense. Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    200
    Not without hard evidence. And all those testimonials and videos and photos always make me laugh. Every photo and video is shittiest thing ever done by a person with Parkinson's apparently.
     
  15. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,125
    Ah, I see now, you simply believe everything anyone tells you. Why didn't you just state that in the first place and saved us the trouble of responding?
     
  16. Read-Only Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,296
    Testimonies are a LONG way from being evidence. And eye-witnesses have always been shown to be highly unreliable.

    And we're talking about science here, not courts of law and science NEVER, EVER accepts testimonies - just cold, hard evidence.
     
  17. EndLightEnd This too shall pass. Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,301
  18. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,125
    Attention? Hysteria? Gullibility?

    All three?
     
  19. EndLightEnd This too shall pass. Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,301
    Ok, yes, we will just assume hundreds of people became insane at the exact same time at different parts of the city.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  20. clusteringflux Version 1. OH! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,760
    Actually there is radar evidence of something that's so far unexplained/able in the sky durring the Stephenville sighting. The PDF report is linked somewhere on this forum.
     
  21. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,125
    Enter the fourth:

    Profit.
     
  22. Read-Only Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,296
    My vote is strongly in favor of the third - gullibility.

    And another big one is just simply wanting to believe in the nonsense to start with.
     
  23. electrafixtion Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    949
    ANYBODY that denies the basic premise that UFOs are REAL and controlled either by occupants or remotely is a complete moron. DON'T waste your time even responding.

    There was once a goldfish named henry that believed in UFOs. Thing is, Henry didn't NEED to BELIEVE in UFOs because UFOs are unquestionably real. Mass sightings and 400 plus independent camcorders filming the same unidentified flying objects in public spectacles is PROOF. If you need more evidence, go watch some cartoons and leave the scientific exploration of the phenomenon to those capable of...well, SCIENCE.
     

Share This Page