Ok. There's a whole variety of defects in your idea. Here are two of them: 1. You assert that religious people shouldn't be allowed to vote. But you still haven't defined what the word 'religion' means to you, or clarified who you believe is and isn't included in this class of 'religious people'. 2. You assert that 'religious people' are 'mentally impaired'. But you've made no attempt to explain, justify and defend that seemingly quite outlandish statement. Since your whole thesis seems to depend on the impairment claim, it's important that you present your case. At this point, all you've been doing here on Sciforums is making trollish noises. You've been trying to make the dogs bark, but you still haven't thrown them any intellectual meat.