The Ontological-Epistemological Link

Discussion in 'General Philosophy' started by Prince_James, Oct 13, 2005.

Page 3 of 3
  1. wesmorris

    wesmorris Nerd Overlord - we(s):1 of N Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,846
    But if the question IS spoken, how, where or why is technically irrelevant.


    Again, if you percieve the question to be asked, the question of whether or not you exist is exactly irrelevant.
     
    wesmorris, Oct 27, 2005
    #41

  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Prince_James

    Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    Wesmorris:

    Ah, but is it? If we cannot even say that it exists, we cannot answer it, nor even say we exist to answer it. There is a presumption of existence in even considering the notion of truth and how we know things, that necessitates an ontological focus.

    But I -must- exist in order to perceive.
     
    Prince_James, Oct 28, 2005
    #42

  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
Page 3 of 3

Share This Page