The idea of non-inference , star trek , to new worlds .

Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by river, Sep 27, 2017.

  1. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,182
    What good idea of ancient history do you have , dave ?

    Lets just stick to the thread dave .
     
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2017
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,620
    This is your thread. You're made an assertion that aliens manipulated our genes. Defend it.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,182
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,620
  8. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,182


    It is an agrument Dave , whats the problem ? From my post#23 .
     
  9. Gawdzilla Sama Registered Member

    Messages:
    276
    It's an assertion from other people that you haven't read yet. Google, read, post. Don't skip any steps.
     
  10. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,620
    OK. Here's my refutation:
    www.google.com
    The rest is up to you.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2017
  11. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,182
    Don't get you ?
     
  12. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,620
    Did you read it? It refutes your argument.
     
  13. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,182
    Read what Dave ?
     
  14. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,620
    I provided the link to the refutation of your argument. Post 27. Read it.
     
  15. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,182
    I get , nothing .
     
  16. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,620
    You get Google. It's up to you to find my refutation; it's all there. Get reading.
     
  17. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,182
    No , your refutation , with google , is your theory .

    Now explain .
     
  18. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,620
    You first.
    When asked to explain your assertion, you provided a link - and nothing else - as if it's our responsibility to develop your assertion for you.
    When asked for my refutation, I provided a link - and nothing else - because, after all, it's your responsibility to develop my refutation for me. Right?
     
  19. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,182
    Your link leads to nothing .
     
  20. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,620
    You have to do the work to find my argument.

    That's your precedent, right?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!




    Look, when I asked you to defend your assertion, you felt that all you had to do was provide a link - with no explanation - no words of your own - and, apparently the onus on others to go and read the entire thing as if that's your assertion.

    That's not how it works.

    You are here, making some sort of assertion (what that assertion is, is still not entirely clear). So you make it. Yourself. A link is not an argument. You may, however, reference the link, to back up your own argument.
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2017
  21. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,182
    The explaination is found in post # 1.
     
  22. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,620
    That is not an explanation. That is your premise - so far, nothing but your baseless opinion. You have not defended it.

    The refutation is as simple as: There are no higher forms and no one has manipulated our genes. Full stop.
     
  23. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,182
    Oh I can't refute your last statement .......
     

Share This Page