Tegmark's mathematical universe hypothesis

The reality is no one will take your work seriously, if you have a website but have never published in a reputable journal.

Is there no one in academia you can reach out to?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Good question. I know what you are saying and it is true. Yes I am planning on a blitz to contact people in the academia and find some sympathetic ones. I have tried half heartedly to contact some professors at my country's university but I found them not suitable. Still I have one in mind that I am saving him when I feel that I have reached a good convincing stage. Actually he is well known, I remember he co-authored a paper that made a stir in the physics community

https://physics.ku.edu.kw/faculty/elias-vagenas

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

What about your thesis supervisor? Or a lecturer at uni you got on with?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Interesting, just found out that he had coauthored an essay in the same FQXI contest as I have.

https://forums.fqxi.org/d/1854-self...le-by-douglas-singleton-elias-vagenas-tao-zhu

 

I did my masters in 1987, my Advisors are long Dead (Peter Unsworth RIP, best advisor and a friend). he was so funny , I still remember his jokes.

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/author/37266791500

 

Ok so you are about 60, never published. This is going to be difficult for you unless you find that ally.
Perhaps there is something you can patent?

 

I appreciate your kind help. I am more push to 70 with a start of a brain meltdown

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

. My website has the "creative common logo" and that is enough for me. Patenting physics ideas with no practical use is typically not possible. I do have a patent in other fields.

https://gccpo.org/AboutUs/Form40En?appid=15382

 

I just want to clarify a point in this post. The errors quickly diminish as the number of iterations and simulated point are increased, however as accuracy increases but after certain increase in iterations and points it will become harder and harder to increase the accuracy (i.e. more accurate significant figures) as anybody who has done PRNG simulation would have noticed.