Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab

My theory

I believe that the geeks at fermilab are going to succeed in creating a miniscule black hole, which according to a science fiction story i read long ago, they will accidentally lose traction on, and upon dropping through the floor will wind up in the earth's core, and eventually it will eat the earth, before we know what is happening.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Paul is a crackpot who doesn't fully understand Mass, Energy and basic Electronic principles, in particular in how they are all interlinked!

As a Physicist or Scientist - I ask what would be the best term to use if one is to reference (Light) used for distance {measurements}?

"Luminosity" or "Red Shift"
Another hint of Paul's rather lacking knowledge is his reference to the Questionable Big bang theory..

If Paul had any clue he would be aware that Redshift measurements and the expansion of our Universe is only a perception being the result of our local Space-Time being compressed into the core of our Galaxy! {Super Black Hole}

As our local area is compressed, our local velocities relative to the Universes change in ratio {As per "c" in a Solid infers} any~who - the result is our perception of an accelerating expansion of our universe.

Quack-pots with no clue in Physics have reversed this expanding perception to a singularity, and since then the big bang theory has fooled almost everybody!

The question remains how many individuals on this planet are intelligent enough to link Electromagnetic waves with Potential and Kinetic energy Err~that's Mass to most Laymen?

And whats more are able to link Velocities with changing references to non changing references Err~for the Layman that's Relativity to Potential and Kinetic energy.

where at one end we have a compressed Solid and at the other a near mass-less Particle that occupies C^2 as per E=MC^2 and M=1 which is a {near vacuum that's highly Kinetic {maximum velocity or "c" in a vacuum - inferred by most quack-pots that don't fully understand electromagnetic transmissions - therefore referring the area being a photon}

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATON AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKAHAVEN AND HERA

In the development of our technological capacity, we have now attained energies some 10 ^ -9 to 10 ^ -14 seconds after the "Big Bang" at the point origin of the Universe. The work of Michael Farady unifying electrical impulse with magnetism in 1821 may serve as a time for the beginning these discoveries leading up to the modren cryogenic accelerators. This interval of 186 years is very small in proportion to the the cosmological intervals noted in observational astronomy for Type !a Supernovae which extend back billions of years to a time near to the origin of our Universe.

Astrophysics, abstract
astro-ph/0510054
From: Romeel Dave' [view email]
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 17:41:19 GMT (58kb)

Simulations of Early Galaxy Formation
Authors: Romeel Davé
Comments: 9 pages, to appear in the proceedings of UC Irvine May 2005 workshop on "First Light & Reionization", eds. E. Barton & A. Cooray, New Astronomy Reviews
Journal-ref: New Astron.Rev. 50 (2006) 24-28

We present the predictions for the photometric and emission line properties of galaxies present during the latter stages of reionization from z=8 to 6. These preliminary predictions are made from cosmological hydrodynamic simulations that include star formation and feedback, but not the effects of radiative transfer. We find significant numbers of galaxies that have stellar masses exceeding 10^8 Mo by z=8, with metallicities in the range of one-tenth solar. These galaxies are just beyond the reach of current near-infrared surveys, but should be found in large numbers by next-generation programs. The Lyman alpha luminosity function does not evolve much from z=6 to z=8, meaning that it should also be possible to detect these objects in significant numbers with upcoming narrow band surveys, unless the escape fraction of Ly-alpha evolves significantly between those epochs.
Full-text: PostScript, PDF, or Other formats

Type Ia Supernovae are remarkable for their singular uniformity in luminosity where they are used as standard candles for distance estimates. May we inquire whether this unifomity is due to their artificial origin? Since there is a large but not infinite potential barrier bewteen the continuum and de Sitter space, breaching this potential barrier is only a function of energy. Alas, we may soon reach this point in the history of mankind thus creating the greatest TRAGEDY OF HISTORY.

All the chidlren will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, BROOKHAVEN, CERN AND HERA

Please note that the current energies now employed in the Tevatron at Fermilab are: a new WORLD RECORD at
285.00E30 at 979.66 GeV - which are greatest energies yet seen on earth!

All possible avenues have been continuously used to bring this matter to
the attention of the world. So far, in over thirty years, no refutation of
these postulations has been given. The physics community has long been
aware of these vast energies and the possibility of generation of Type Ia
Supernova as a result of these experiments. All of us are then responsible
for our fate!

All the chldren will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation

 

One can only hope that they are successful at achieving such an explosion. If they do not succeed they must keep trying.

 

Somehow I think these physicists at fermilab have enough experience and knowledge of modern physics to anticipate a possible supernova! I'm sure they feel there is no threat.

 

what you spend that many millions if you would knew the precise outcome?

 

I said I'm sure they feel no threat. Not I'm sure they feel no outcome

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKHAVEN AND LOS ALAMOS

We always need to bring in the human factor into these consideration since it is human motivation which ramps these values to an ever higher level.

The search for the elusive Higgs Boson has reached the level of forming an international contest between Fermilab and the forthcoming higher energy levels at CERN. (Jenny Hogan (2007) Behind the Hunt for the Higgs Boson
Nature 445, 7125, p.239)

Please note that the current energies now employed in the Tevatron at Fermilab are: a new WORLD RECORD at
285.00E30 at 979.66 GeV - which are greatest energies yet seen on earth!

Work at the Los Alamos National Laboratory and elsewhere shows
monoenergetic beams of relativistic electrons that are laser driven at energies now at
10TVm^-1 surpassing those in conventional accelerators by six orders of
magnitude. These values are sufficient to allow confinement fusion and
hence supernova generation via the formation of a breach in the potential
barrier towards de Sitter space with current work and also with further
development in this line of endeavor. (Hegelich, B. E. et al (2006) Laser
acceleration of quasi-monoenergetic MeV ion beams. Nature 439, 7075,
441-448)

All possible avenues have been continuously used to bring this matter to
the attention of the world. So far, in over thirty years, no refutation of
these postulations has been given. The physics community has long been
aware of these vast energies and the possibility of generation of Type Ia
Supernova as a result of these experiments. All of us are then responsible
for our fate!

All the chldren will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation

 

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKHAVEN AND LOS ALAMOS

We always need to bring in the human factor into these consideration since it is human motivation which ramps these values to an ever higher level.

The search for the elusive Higgs Boson has reached the level of forming an international contest between Fermilab and the forthcoming higher energy levels at CERN. (Jenny Hogan (2007) Behind the Hunt for the Higgs Boson
Nature 445, 7125, p.239)

Please note that the current energies now employed in the Tevatron at Fermilab are: a new WORLD RECORD at
285.00E30 at 979.66 GeV - now Feb 2007 Store 5245 292.2E30 at 979.66 GeV which are greatest energies yet seen on earth!

Work at the Los Alamos National Laboratory and elsewhere shows
monoenergetic beams of relativistic electrons that are laser driven at energies now at
10TVm^-1 surpassing those in conventional accelerators by six orders of
magnitude. These values are sufficient to allow confinement fusion and
hence supernova generation via the formation of a breach in the potential
barrier towards de Sitter space with current work and also with further
development in this line of endeavor. (Hegelich, B. E. et al (2006) Laser
acceleration of quasi-monoenergetic MeV ion beams. Nature 439, 7075,
441-448)

All possible avenues have been continuously used to bring this matter to
the attention of the world. So far, in over thirty years, no refutation of
these postulations has been given. The physics community has long been
aware of these vast energies and the possibility of generation of Type Ia
Supernova as a result of these experiments. All of us are then responsible
for our fate!

All the chldren will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation

 

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKHAVEN, HERA AND LOS ALAMOS

The proximity of Supernova generation in our galaxy may be important to this discussion since the effects of these vast deflagrations may be noted in our terrestrial environment. Thus we note:

"Nov. 2, 2004 A stellar blast might have helped initiate human evolution
three million years ago, according to German scientists who have found
clear traces of an ancient supernova explosion deep beneath the Pacific
Ocean.

Sifting through dust on the ocean floor at a depth of 15,750 feet, Gunther
Korschinek and colleagues at the Technical University of Munich in Germany
found 28 layers of iron-60, a radioactive isotope of iron which experts
believe is unlikely to have come from anything other than the heat,
pressure and nuclear activity of a supernova.

Some of the major events in early hominid evolution appear to be coeval
with the African climate changes.

"Fe-60 (iron-60) is a unique indicator for the detection of supernova
debris on Earth," the researchers wrote in the latest issue of Physical
Review Letters.

With a decay rate of about 1.5 million years, this long-lived chemical
variant of iron can also have a key role in helping to date supernova
explosions.

According to Korschinek's team, the iron-60 layers indicate that the star
exploded 2.8 million years ago at a distance from Earth of a few tens of
parsecs (1 parsec is approximately 3.26 light-years), showering down not
only solid matter in the form of iron, but also cosmic rays."

All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation

 

is there any evidence of such supernova from lunar samples?

 

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, BROOKHAVEN, CERN AND LOS ALAMOS

We may further review what are the effects of proximity to Supernova deflagration in this brief article:

"Death Star New Scientist 4 Apr 98

The most dramatic crisis the living world has seen for hundreds of
millions of years was caused by a nearby supernova, a geologist in Hungary
suggests. He believes he has found debris from the exploded star. The
Permian extinction about 250 million years ago wiped out 90 per cent of
all species oii Earth. Yet its cause has remained a mystery. Years of
research have failed to turn up any solid evidence for an asteroid impact
comparable to the one blamed for the death of the dinosaurs 65 million
years ago. Other causes that have been suggested include volcanism in
Siberia and widespread depletion of ocean oxygen. But neither theory is
widely accepted, because no one understands how these could have such a
drastic effect. Astrophysicists first pointed to supernovae as possible
culprits more than two decades ago. John Ellis of CERN, the European
Laboratory for Particle Physics in Geneva, and David Schramm of the
University of Chicago estimated that every few hundred million years, a
star explodes within a few tens of light years from Earth. At that
distance, high-energy particles and radiation from the blast could strip
away the Earth's ozone layer for two hundred years, with potentially
deadly results. With the ozone layer gone, ultraviolet light from the Sun
and the supernova would penetrate the atmosphere, changing its chemistry
and killing surface plants and animals. Hot gas and plasma from the
explosion might also have disrupted the Earth's magnetosphere, allowing
cosmic rays to reach the ground and causing more devastation, says Imre
Toth, an astronomer at Konkoly Observatory in Budapest. Toth's colleague,
Csaba Detre of the Geological Institute of Hungary, also in Budapest,
says he has now found what could be the debris of an exploded
star-metal rich globules 3 to 20 micrometres in diameter. These appear in
rocks from the period in Japan, China, India, Armenia, Iran and Hungary.
The abundance of elements such as aluminium in the globules suggest Tiley
came from outside the Solar System, he says. Detre's discoveries,
announced last month at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in
Houston, left other researchers "very interested", says geologist Thomas
Ahrens at the California Institute of Technology. But the case is far from
proven. "There are several big leaps that I have trouble with," says Rich
Muller of the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory in California. Detre now plans
to firm up his data by analysing the isotopes and trace elements in the
globules. He also hopes to pin down their ages, which are not easy to
gauge from most deposits of that period. Jeff Necht"

All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation

 

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKHAVEN AND LOS ALAMOS

Please review the methodology for the developement of the intersecting beams of protons and antiprotons and the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.

http://professordixon.blogspot.com

Then consider the possibility of entropic changes in the controlling computer based mechanism as shown in this Accelerator Update.

Fermi National Laboratory

Accelerator Update

Monday December 31
Operations monitored store #870. (A store consists of the colliding proton
and antiproton particle beams.) The Antiproton Source (Pbar) stacked
(collected antiprotons). The H- source suffered from multiple trips, which
interferes with stacking. (Fermilab has two Preaccelerators called I minus
and H minus. This is where the particle beam begins. Only one Preacc is
used at a time. The other is kept in reserve.) At 9 AM a Pbar expert held
off stacking for an hour while he worked on the stacktail cooling system.
(The stacktail is the least dense region of the antiproton beam and where
the beam is deposited. Stacktail cooling is the process of moving the
antiprotons from the stacktail into the stack.) Booster personnel worked
on a RF station during this time. (RF stands for Radio Frequency, which is
the electromagnetic energy used to accelerate particles.) Operators
investigated the breaker trips that had been occurring at F0 since Friday
and discovered that the breaker's time delay may need to be changed.
Experts weren't sure. (The TeV's four miles of tunnel is divided into six
equal sections, A through F.) This breaker controls power for equipment in
the P1 line, one of the Main Injector's (MI) transfer lines. The Duty
Electrician said he needed an hour to investigate further. An expert
installed an amp-meter to monitor the breaker's current. Pbar returned to
stacking at 10:22 AM. At 2 PM Operation terminated store #870.
Unfortunately the beam quenched at A48. (A quench refers to a cryogenic
magnet going from a superconductive temperature of 4 Kelvin to normal.
Absolute zero is zero Kelvin. One Kelvin is equal to one degree on the
Celsius scale.) Various controls problems started around 7 PM and
continued until near the end of shift. Apparently part of the controls
system was having temporal issues dealing with leaving the old year.
Operations established store #872 at 9:21 PM. Its initial luminosity was
5.75E30.


(The stacktail is the least dense region of the antiproton beam and where
the beam is deposited. Stacktail cooling is the process of moving the
antiprotons from the stacktail into the stack.) Booster personnel worked
on a RF station during this time. (RF stands for Radio Frequency, which is
the electromagnetic energy used to accelerate particles.) Operators
investigated the breaker trips that had been occurring at F0 since Friday
and discovered that the breaker's time delay may need to be changed.
Experts weren't sure. (The TeV's four miles of tunnel is divided into six
equal sections, A through F.) This breaker controls power for equipment in
the P1 line, one of the Main Injector's (MI) transfer lines. The Duty
Electrician said he needed an hour to investigate further. An expert
installed an amp-meter to monitor the breaker's current. Pbar returned to
stacking at 10:22 AM. At 2 PM Operation terminated store #870.
Unfortunately the beam quenched at A48. (A quench refers to a cryogenic
magnet going from a superconductive temperature of 4 Kelvin to normal.
Tuesday January 1
Happy New Year. Operations monitored store #872. Pbar stacked. The H-
source continued to trip. At 5 AM a Booster RF station tripped off and
wouldn't reset. Operators bypassed the station. A LINAC expert switched
the Preaccelerator back to the I- source. At 6:30 PM Operations terminated
store #872 and again beam quenched at A48. Operations established store
#874 at 11:19 PM. It had an initial luminosity of 8.7E30.

Wednesday January 2
Operations monitored store #874. Pbar stacked. At 3:30 AM a Control Power
Chassis for Booster correction elements failed. Experts came in and had
the problem resolved by 6 AM. Pbar then returned to stacking.

All the children will thank your for your kind efforts on their behalf. Please
act before it is too late!

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph,D,
Supernova from Experimentation

 

From Paul Dixons' Blogspot:

Estienne cites Sir Martin Rees as
an authority who believes that a jolt
of energy from a particle accelerator
would be the catalyst for the cataclysm.
However, Rees himself says it isn’t so.
Rees, the British Astronomer Royal,
published a paper with Piet Hut, of the
Institute for Advanced Study, for the
science journal Nature (vol. 302, April 7,
1983) proposing: “It is possible that the
vacuum state we live in is not the
absolute lowest one.”
Hut and Rees hypothesized that
supercooling in the universe could have
created the level of “false” vacuum in the
universe we experience, separated by an
energy barrier from a “true” vacuum.
They further hypothesized that if a large
enough bubble of “true” vacuum formed
in our universe, it would expand at close
to the speed of light and boil us all into a
state of “true” vacuum.
But, they observed, leaking or
“tunneling” between the vacuum states
is unlikely, because it hasn’t happened in
the universe in 1010 years of high-energy
cosmic-ray collisions. Then they asked,
with characteristic understatement,
whether a new generation of particle
accelerators “might trigger such an
unfortunate event.”
They concluded (emphasis added):
“We show here that this chance,
fortunately, is completely negligible since
the region inside our past light cone has
already survived some 105 cosmic-ray
collisions at centre-of-mass energies of
1011 GeV (billion electron volts) and
higher…. We can be confident that no
particle accelerator in the foreseeable
future will pose any threat to our
vacuum.”
Even if the Tevatron in Run II
achieves an energy of 2 TeV (two
trillion electron volts), that would be
the equivalent of 2x103 GeV, or about
a hundred-millionth (1/100,000,000)
of the minimum energy level Rees sets
for major cosmic collisions that have
already occurred without arranging
an Armageddon.
Cosmic rays at Tevatron levels and
higher have been striking the earth 100
million times per second for four billion
years. That means—
108 collisions/second at
3 x 107 seconds/year for
4 x 109 years = 12 x 1024
or 1.2 x 1025 collisions at Tevatron
levels over the lifetime of Earth.
The Tevatron will produce 106
collisions per second, so if it operated
every second for the next four billion
years, it would produce about one
percent of the cosmic-ray collisions
that Earth has already absorbed at that
level without a cataclysm.

 

It's a scary place out there in the universe; but obviously not scary enough to cause a spontaeous supernova.

 

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKHAVEN AND LOS ALAMOS

The beam emittance in a particle acclerator is minimized to a few nanometers cross-section to increase the intensity of the burn. The focus the two beam provides for the transition towards de Sitter space since it is the breaching of the potential barrier which is only a function of energy which provides for generation of a Type Ia Supernova. Thus low emittance is where the particles are confined to a small distance and nearly the same momentum.

Please note that the energies now employed in the Tevatron are virtually identical with those seen at the point origin of the Universe. These energies are those found at 10^-9 to 10^-14 seconds after the Big Bang. Thus, these energies are far greater than those seen in cosmic rays since they are virtually identical with the infinite, temperature, pressure and density values found at Universe generation. Please use your imagination to envision the result where this level of energetics is regulary employed and a transition is made towards another dimension termed de Sitter space.

http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery;... xt=luminosity

Please note: Malcolm J Perry, Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe? Nature 320, April 24, 1986, p 679. This illustrates how we are protected from the vast energies in de Sitter space by a large though not infinite potential barrier. Please kindly review the letter included in this post to Lisa Madigan, Attorney General State of Illinois in this regard.

As can be seen from the following description, the RHIC at Brookahaven National Laboratory has created a highly energetic event that is now under discussion. Where it is disputed that it is a black hole, the event is there and there can be no dispute that it is potential precursor of a transition towards de Sitter space thus leaving us with the forthcoming generation of a Type Ia Supernova. All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf!

Black holes at RHIC?
A statement from RHIC theoretical nuclear physicist Dmitri Kharzeev:

Horatiu Nastase, a member of the high-energy physics theory group at
Brown
University, has written a paper, posted on the preprint website
arxiv.org,
in which he claims that collisions at Brookhavens Relativistic Heavy
Ion
Collider (RHIC) produce the analog of a black hole.

Horatiu is referring to a mathematical similarity between the physics
of
the real world, which govern RHIC collisions, and the physics that
scientists use to describe a theoretical, imaginary black hole in a
hypothetical world with a different number of space-time dimensions

An informal review submitted for your interest. So far no refutation to these postulations derived from the Generalized Theory of Relativity of Albert Einstein has been given.

"From: macx 20/11/2003 4:55:30 PM
Subject: re: The end of the world is nigh post id: 802129
Is this the longest thread in science history on the net. This has been
running for years!!!

"SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB"

As far as I know, no one has been able to discredit the guy, Paul W.
Dixon, Ph.D. Supernova from Experimentation.

The whole thread is a dooooooozy....something for everyone....

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?s=5a60b75a44cff1e95f538a3fc18$

)

macx"


We should recall in this connection that ignoring the laws of physics in no ways diminishes their power and universal efficacy. While the luminoisity at Fermialb has again reached towards the world record with 162.92E30 luminosity, the one thing we can be sure of is, following the generalization of Willem de Sitter and his modern counterparts of the General Theory Relativiy,that as these values increase at some point a transition towards de Sitter space will be formed thus releasing the force of a Type 1a Supernova.

All the childeren will thank you for your most kind effrots on their behalf. Type Ia Supernova are featured prominently in the scientific lliterature. For example, please note: Armin Rest, et al., Light echoes from ancient supernovae in the Large Magellanic Cloud, Nature 438, 7071, 22/29 December 2005, pp. 1132-1134.

The following request has been posted to the Accelupdates at Fermilab for their response.

Would you be so kind as to bring forward some commentary on the
possible dangers which may be present with this high-energy physics
research. In particular, would you be so kind as to comment on the
possibilty of forming such a transtion towards de Sitter space so
as to release the force of a Type Ia Supernova.

It would be most reassuring to your readers if you would demonstrate
that this is not possible. One of the former Directors of the British
Infrared Observatory on Mauna Kea, Hawaii indicated that scale
was of no consequence in the formation of a transition of this
nature. Of possible interest in this connection is the following
commentary from the CERN website.

"The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is a particle accelerator which will probe
deeper into matter than ever before. Due to switch on in 2007, it will
ultimately collide beams of protons at an energy of 14 TeV . Beams of lead
nuclei will be also accelerated, smashing together with a collision energy
of 1150 TeV."

May we reiterate our request and we thank you one and all for your support in this most tragic potential experimental mischance. Please leave your address at (dixon at hawaii.edu) to confirm your wish to become a plaintiff in the forthcoming suit regarding public endangerment before it is too late.

So far for the past three years there has been a steady increase in the luminosity at Fermilab. In this way, the energries are increasing to the point where a transition towards de Sitter Space is inevitable. Precursor events such as the generation of fiireball at the RHIC at Brookhaven would indicate that these colliders are now in the range of creating a Type Ia Supernova.
Please read further in this post for a report of this event

Let us all work together to save the lives of everyone before it is too late. The time has come to bring together a discussion of all those concerned on public television so that the general public may be allowed to form their own conclusion regarding the merits of this research. Since it the taxpayers money which is funding this research, it is only fair that they be allowed full access to all the information about the public endangerment this research entails.

http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/tevlum.html

Let us now join with Ad Lagendijk as group leader at FOM-Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics, Amseterdam, University Professor at the University of Amersterdam, Professor of Physics at the Universityof Twente, all in the Netherlands as New Years Resolution to change the norms and values of physics, to become emancipated. To do away with a primitive tally system of publication, citation and patents so that we can expect higher moral behavior of physicists. Let us not drive ourselves into a Type Ia Supernova generation through competitive overkill!!! (Pushing for power, Nature, 438, 7067, Nov. 28, p. 429, 2005)

May we propose that all who are interested join in a lawsuit to halt the final plunge to our doom via the generation of a Type Ia Supernova indicate their interest by emailing me at dixon@hawaii.edu. This will help support the
legal actions of Dr. Rick Wagner and Dr. Walter Wagner who have brought suit against this development both in San Francisco and in New York. So far these suits have not been successful but we should continue these most worthy efforts. Their postion is that the research is proceeding without adequately checking for possible harm such as generation of Type Ia Supernova.

The construction of an hypothesis is based on a study of the relevant literature as seen in the letter, here included in this thread, to Lisa Madigan, Attorney Gerneral of the State of Illinois. Alas, the hypothesis derived from this literature is one well-known to all advanced scholars in modern physics, i.e, the formation of a Type Ia Supernova via the formation of transition towards de Sitter space. As the energy level increases in the CDF at Fermilab, we need only wait and see if this work at the highest-energy physics facility confirms this hypothesis with the generation of a Type Ia Supernova.
All the children will thank you for your prompt actions in this regard and may the good God have mercy on our souls!

Please recall that in a sciforums discussions should be directed at the scientific content of the forum. In order to refute those conclusions brought forward in this thread, it is essential that the major tenets of the the General Theory of Albert Einstein and its further derivation by Willem de Sitter be refuted with a complete mathematical description. In other words, the major work of relativistic cosmology must be disproved to form an objection to those conclusions regarding Type Ia Supernova generation as brought forward in this thread. So far, in some thirty years of presentation of this theoretical matrix to the international forum of physics authorities this has not been done.

The rate of change towards ever higher energies has been accelerated at Fermilab thus decreasing the time remaining for our planet earth and all of us as well. Many thanks for your kind attention and prompt actions in this tragic concern.

The central theories are The General Theory of Relativity of Albert Einstein, which is very well respected and established in the field of physics circa 1920, and also the Standard Model of Quantum Field Physics begun in the 1970's. The Standard Model is incomplete since it does not encompass gravitational phenomena. Since it is the extension of the Generalized Theory of Relativity which predicts to de Sitter space this would be a reliable and established prediction based on modern relativistic cosmology. We need only wait for the confirmation of this prediction with the generation of a Type Ia Supernova from Fermilab, Brookhaven or CERN. Billions of dollars are being spent in this pursuit of confirmation of the exisence of de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now termed.

Many thanks to everyone for your most kind actions in this tragic concern.
(Please note: World Record for Luminosity, i.e., greatest energy yet seen on earth) Clearly, a scientific enterprise that deals wth energies found only fractions of a second after the point origin of the universe should proceed with caution and prudence or we shall all perish!

This ongoing steady progression towards our doom is mow posted and also as supporting documentation for the values given for the increase in luminosity at the highest-energy physics facility the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/tevlum.html

Of further note in this connection, is additional evidence for the presence of de Sitter space in astronomical observations. Type Ia Supernovae are more
energetic than other Supernovae by a factor of some 2.4. This is the case
even though the progenitor object is of some 1 solar mass or less. These objects may then be below the Chandrasekar limit necessary for the implosion
threshold necessary for the generation of Supernovae.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova

Other evidence for the intrusional events from de Sitter space may be noted in the monopolar jets from quasars. These objects are four to five times larger than bipolar objects. Where the fluxional energetics of these variables is measured in millions of galaxies, it would appear plausible to assume that there is a unique source of energetics for these larger objects (i.e. de Sitter space) since there is a dichotomous distinction between Class I and Class II objects. (Burns, J. O.(1990) Chasing the monster's tail: new views of cosmic jets. Astronomy, (18) 8, 28-37) Recent observations in suppot this postulation are found in, Discovery of a bright quasar without a massive host galaxy (Magain, P. Letawe, G., Courbin, F., Jablonka, P., Jahnke, K., Meylan, G., Wisotzki, l., (2005) 7057, 437, pp. 381-384). Thus indicating that the enormous fluxional energetics of millions of galaxies over thousands of light-years extending for billions of years may have origin in de Sitter space or other similar energetic domain.

Please review this presentation on Type Ia Supernovae.

These supernovae are sufficiently uniform as to be used as standard candles in observational cosmology. While they are believed to form as a neighboring star has hydrogen siphoned off of it to form sufficient mass to produce the implosion necessary for supernova generation from a white dwarf, there is no trace of hydogen at the time of maximum light. Also, the process of ignition is not known. The hypothesis that sentient entitites much like ourselves
create Type Ia Supernovae is therefore brought forward. Should we be the only ones to create Tyoe Ia Supernova this would in a sense go against the uniformity of Nature. If on the other hand, they are noted arising as uniquely bright events that outshine their respective galaxies of origination throughout the cosmos, this would indicated that the possiblity of causing a Type Ia Supernova from experimentation is a frequent and uniform event. At this time all of the major leaders in high-energy physics are familiar with this postulation. May we therefor call for a moratorium on this line of research until that parameters controlling a transition towards de Sitter space are better understood.

Accelerator Update on the Fermilab Home Page shows Tevatron CDF at 284.55E30 luminosity for the most recent world record at the highest-energy Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. These energies are greater than those achieved at CERN. In scientific notation, this 284.55 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 284.55 x 10 to the 41st power
electron volts (284.55 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th
power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
shall all perish.
http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/tevlum.html

A natural question in this connection is why are these experiments being conducted. It may be noted in this connection that the world we see is constructed from just six particles, three matter particles (up quarks, down quarks and electrons), two force quanta (photons and gluons, and Higgs bosons, There are three sets of particles where each set is heavier than the preceeding set with the interactions of the particles in each set being the same as the preceeding set. The standard model cannot explain these differences. (Kane, G. (2005) The mysteries of mass, Scientific American 293, 1, 40-48) We may postulate that the vast explosion at the point origin of the universe may have produced at lest three wave actions that are reflected in these increasing masses of these fundamental particles as three separate waves propagated in the fields which embody electromagnetism, as well as the weak and strong interatomic binding forces. May we recommend more theoretical work in this connection rather than empirical to leave our world intact for every child as they grow older.

Many, many thanks to everyone for their kind concern in this most tragic
work in highest-energy physics. It must be only a miracle that we all remain alive given the entropic diffculties of continuous computer operations controlling the separation of the bunches of particles and antiparticles in the ring at Fermilab.

May we recommend the treatment of the Weyl Tensor from Tensor, mathworld
to provide an introduction to the mathematical exposition necessary for an
intuitive understanding of those philosophies which undergird our understanding of the continuum and de Sitter space. The advantage of mathematics is that it provides a handle whereby these concepts of a philiosophical nature can be found to conform to a set of basic mathematical
operations. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Tensor.html The tensor equations for the de Sitter Universe are provided in "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_
Sitter_ universe" which with the tensor equations for the Weyl Tensor provide the general values for the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now
termed.

Please note that so far in over thirty years of discourse in physics internationally in this connection there has been no refutation of the central tenets of the General Theoryof Relativity and the extension of this work by Willem de Sitter. Discourse in a Sciforums should concern itself with matters of physics particularly in this matter of generation Type Ia Supernova from high-energy physics experimentation.

Of general interest are: Out of this world: Colliding Universes, Branes, Strings and Other Wild Ideas of Modern Physics by Stephen Webb (Copernicus, 2004)
also a better volume, The Elegant Universe by Brian Greene (W. W, Norton, 1999).

We may refer to the greatest seer of the ancient Hellenes, Tiresias, who
stated that the Truth is always visible and audible, yet never acknowleged.

With the highest energies yet recorded on our planet with a new LUMINOSITY RECORD at Fermilab these energies are now at 284.55E30 at some 2(979.66) energetics. We have thus another major step towards ultimate doom in this chronicle of our tragic species. All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf !

The central motivation for this thread is to prevent the ultimate doom for all of mankind. Where modern physics clearly reveals the presence of the high-energy condition according to the work of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter which we are protected from by a large potential barrier. The question has been raised by myself and my colleagues with the scientists as Fermilab, how this research can continue with the generation of a Type Ia Supernova as a certain result of laboratory mischance with the increased energies in the CDF at Fermilab. In a classical sense, the penetration of a potential barrier is only a function of energy. The scientists and other staff members indicated to us that 1.) They did not wish to work for "Ma Bell," Illinois. In other words for the telephone company. 2.) There was a philosophical quest for truth undergirding their research. To these replies, my colleagues indicated that this was essentially a selfish motivation since they risked the doom of everyone by their research with their energies approximating those found at the point origin of the universe. Should we accept their explanatory framework, or should we avoid this headlong rush to ultimate doom?

Gravitationally based phenomena such as the formation of black holes and strangelets would not be expected from the highly-energetic conditions either at Fermilab or Brookhaven.. In modern physics, the lower energy condition as well as de Sitter space (the higher energy condition) would be possible. As indicated in the letter to Illinois Attorney General Madigan, the postulation of an intrusional event from de Sitter space is more likely than a transition towards the lower energy condition though a transition to the lower energy condition would be possible. The entire universe would then flow into the lower energy condition. The energies now found at Fermilab will be exceeded by a factor of seven when the Large Hadron Collider at CERN begins operation. For some reason best known to the physicsts at Fermilab, they are leaving the accelerator in Batavia, Illinois. (Brumfiel, G., High-risk physics, Nature. 9 June 2005, V. 435, 7043,pp. 728-729) All of the information forwarded to sciforums has also been sent to the staff at Fermilab.

Many thanks to Porfiry and Luciano Maiani, Director of CERN, for their most kind help in this tragic concern. Please note that this prediction is based on relativistic cosmology of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter. This theory has an excellent record in predicting, explaining and controlling the data of observation in physics. Quantum mechanics is the other major theory in physics yet there still remain a number of difficulties in the explanatory framework for quantum mechanics as noted by Heisenberg and others.

Please note in the blog cited below the statements on the far right at the bottom- Calls for a moratorium of research at Fermilab. This exchange indicates that only the lack of computer error in the control of the two sets of 36 bunches of protons and antiprotons circulating at light speed in the ring at Fermilab that has kept the coalesence of energies from occuring sufficient to breach the potential barrier towards de Sitter space, Over time, with continuous operation of the ring at Fermilab the effect of noise(entropy) must occur providing for this coalesence as mentioned in this interchange with Peter H. Grabincius of Fermilab. Only a moratorium on this experimenation will preserve the life of all mankind form Type Ia Supernova
generation in Batavia, Illinois.

Please access:

http://professordixon.blogspot.com

to review the responses from both Fermilab and CERN regarding the generation of Supernova from highest-energy physics experimentation.
Other relevant documents regarding the topological covariance of the continuum and de Sitter space in the now dominant theory as given in the following letter to Attorney General Illinois Lisa Madigan are also presented in the blog. A request has been forwarded to the director of CERN to bring foward an international forum to call a halt to the highest-energy physics experimentation at Fermilab, Cern and Brookhaven RHIC should the general public decide this is the best course of action. Since this research is being carried out with public funds, let the public decide whether this research should be continued!

Should the coalesence of the of the particles and antiparticles occur due to a minor glitch in the timing mechanism in the timing computer at Fermilab the the following statistical analysis will apply to the combined energies of the particles and antiparticles in the Ring at Fermilab

The information provided here gives the listing of the references as well as
a philosophical perspective on de Sitter space. Thus, where there are highly
energetic conditions as at the galactic core there should be a higher frequency of Supernovae generation via the formation of transitions towards de Sitter space. This postulation, therefore anticipates a greater probability of penetrating the potential barrier towards de Sitter space under highly energetic conditons such as are found at Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois.

"Given the frequency of supernovae at the galactic core..."

http://www.solstation.com/x-objects/s2.htm

Many thanks for your concern and prompt actions in this tragic progression. All our hopes and dreams are being sacrificed in this imprudent plunge into the unknown. Please forward to us any questions in this regard.

As the energies in the colliders both at Fermilab and also at Brookhaven are increased from those expected at 10^-9 to 10^-15 seconds after the point origin of the universe (Big Bang), there should occur changes in the energetics which indicate the presence of the densely energetic condition of de Sitter space,

Such has now been observed at Brookhaven where the enormously dense energy matrix of de Sitter space has created an influx of particles from the accelerator. This has given rise to thermal radiation as would be expected from this level of energetics as we follow the results from the familiar equation e=mc^2.

The next level of energetics should, under this postulation, create a reply from de Sitter space in the form of Type Ia Supernova thus destroying our planet, our solar system and a host of nearby stars. Please contact Horatiu Nastase at the RHIC at Broohaven National Laboratory of this conclusion from the theoretical formulations of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter in the Einstein de Sitter Uinverse as it is now termed.

"A fireball created in a US particle accelerator has the characteristics of a black hole, a physicist has said. It was generated at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) in New York, US, which smashes beams of gold nuclei together at near light speeds. Horatiu Nastase says his calculations show that the core of the fireball has a striking similarity to a black hole. His work has been published on the pre-print website arxiv.org and is reported in New Scientist magazine. When the gold nuclei smash into each other they are broken down into particles called quarks and gluons. These form a ball of plasma about 300 times hotter than the surface of the Sun. This fireball, which lasts just 10 million, billion, billionths of a second, can be detected because it absorbs jets of particles produced by the beam collisions. But Nastase, of Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, says there is something unusual about it.

Ten times as many jets were being absorbed by the fireball as were predicted by calculations. The Brown researcher thinks the particles are disappearing into the fireball's core and reappearing as thermal radiation, just as matter is thought to fall into a black hole and come out as "Hawking" radiation. However, even if the ball of plasma is a black hole, it is not thought to pose a threat. At these energies and distances, gravity is not the dominant force in a black hole.

This text was taken from this link right here:
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.co...ws.php?id=36412"
Quoted from Astro news: Man made pseudo blackhole, Astronomy, Exobiology & Cosmology

It may be understod in this connection that in over 30 years of presenting these findings from the General Theory of Relativity and the extension to
de Sitter space by Willem Sitter, there has been no refutation of this
work. Notification of the Illinois Attorney General is, therefore, in order to bring to a halt this very great and potenially tragic public endangerment
This is the question. Should we continue with this large a penalty of complete extinction for everyone for this research with greatest energies at the highest energy physics laboratory? Now again setting a new record for energies found on earth. Is this an existensial dilemma that only those who are concerned about humanity can solve? We need your help in this connection to please bring word of this public endangerment to the
Illinois Attorney General. We do, most respectfully, request a moratorium on
this highest-energy physics research until a refutation of this conceptual
framework is published in a peer-reviewed journal of highest-repute - or all must perish!

Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

http://www.uhh.hawaii.edu/~dixon/quantum_tunneling.pdf

All thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.
Please contact Lisa Madigan, Illinois Attorney General and request that she take action in this public endangerment. A letter to her is included here:

This research is being carried out to follow the thought of Richard P. Feynmnan among others to examine the partons of the subatomic realm of
physics. Alas, as you begin to discover the basic building block of matter you enter into the energies necessary to form a transition towards de Sitter space and release the force of a Type Ia Supernova!

15 June 2004

Lisa Madigan
Illinois Attorney General
500 South Second Street
Springfield, Ill 62706

Dear Attorney General,

May we request your interest in the onset of the very great energy increments now underway in June and July 2004 at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. There is a very great probability that this experimental apparatus will generate a supernova thus producing a very great and grave public endangerment to the personnel of the laboratory, their families, the United States of America and also the population of our planet.

A physicist, Dr. Walter Wagner,
http://www.msnbc.com/news/314049.asp?0m=T17N
has already brought suit against this forthcoming disaster in New York State and also in California. He states that the research is being brought forward without regard for the potential danger only to get the research underway. May we very respectfully call on the good offices of all concerned citizens of the world to halt this reckless plunge into the unknown on behalf of the families of all mankind.

In this connection, may we present an alternate hypothesis to that presented by Mike Perricone in the FermiNews (The Universe Lives On, June 19, 1998). This postulation may be termed the high-energy postulation wherein the equations show the attractive properties of the high-energy condition termed de Sitter space. It would, therefore, under this postulation be found that high-energy physics experimentation now coming on line at the Tevatron in our Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory would have a greater probability of releasing a supernova upon our planet and solar system by breaching the potential barrier towards the high-energy condition (de Sitter Space) than initiating a transition towards the low-energy condition. This hypothesis is based on the work of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter. Their work has proven uniformly correct in the realm of physics and would necessarily be found to be true in relativistic cosmology. (Blau, S. K., Guendelman, E. I. & Guth, A. H(1987) Physical Review D. Particle and Fields, 3, 1747-1766. To quote in this connection from Alan Guth who initiated inflationary cosmology, "one might guess that the gravitational repulsion of the false vacuum would push outward on the bubble wall, so, if the repulsion were strong enough. Not so however, say the equations of general relativity. The gravitational repulsion causes the false vacuum to swell, but the repulsion does not extend beyond the false vacuum. Objects outside the bubble wall are attracted towards the bubble, and the gravitational force on the bubble is inward." (Burns, J.O. (1990) Astronomy, 18, 28-37)

The possibility of initiating a transition towards the lower-energy condition from high-energy physics experimentation may still be present, yet this kind of transition would have far lower probability value according to the aforementioned equation.

May we very respectfully request that these transitions be modeled via computer simulation before the Tevatron at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory continues with any further experimentation at this time. To avoid any bias in understanding, publication of these results in a peer-reviewed journal of highest repute is most respectfully recommended to members of the staff at Fermilab.

It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3 , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation. This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a public endangerment as well.

This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere, the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger for their release.

With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed, and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to relativistic cosmology.

No harm will result from computer modelling of this alternate hypothesis for generation of Type Ia supernovae as a result of the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space. Yet clearly, vast harm may result form our continuing to plunge into the unknown without proper foresight concerning this possibility.

All of the children will thank you for your kind offices on their behalf. Please do what you can for them in this connection.

Your kind attention and consideration in this most salient matter are most gratefully appreciated.

All best wishes for you and your family.

With greatest respect,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology and Linguistics

Many thanks to Porfiry for his most kind help in this tragic concern.

 

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB, CERN, BROOKHAVEN AND LOS ALAMOS

From a theological perspective, a caring deity would be concerned that if you were going to carry out this kind of high-energy physics research with such extreme risks entailed, then certainly one should be aware of the danger involved and be convinced of the reality of this danger, i.e., Supernova generation. On the other hand, should one still persist in carying out this research then you may have the individual right to do so, i.e., having free will with exteme hubris, but others should still bring legal action to bear since this research entails such an enormous public endangerment.

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation

 

Paul

The links YOU provided in your lengthy post above refutes your own assertions, why would you post them?

 

{roflol}