SuperLuminal's Experiment

Discussion in 'Physics & Math' started by Rosnet, Jul 25, 2005.

  1. superluminal . Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,717
    Mac, at this point I cant muster a coherent thought. wine.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. MacM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,104
    I'll not add insult to injury by saying I noticed but only wish you a good hangover.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    30,374
    MacM,

    I've explained the GPS system to you in enough detail for you to understand it. Still don't get it?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. MacM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,104
    Sorry James R but this is a bad joke. I raised the GPS issue and described how it worked, with respect to the ECI. 2Inq... has explained GPS in great detail to you and has explained why you are wrong.

    You are the one that doesn't seem to get it. GPS supports an absolute physical underpinning to relativity. Not the SR view which includes reciprocity.

    Relativity is based on respective motion and not relative velocity.
     
  8. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    30,374
    Whatever, MacM. Come back when you have support for your assertions.
     
  9. MacM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,104
    Unfortunately for you James R, I have defeated your every effort to obscure the truth and slander me. Your now continued string of non-physics responses with these kinds of simplistic unsupported innuendos just adds the icing on the cake. Your are finished here. You now no longer have any credability regarding the issue of SRT.
     
  10. superluminal . Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,717
    Credibility according to who? You and your masses of followers here?
     
  11. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    30,374
    Whatever, MacM. Can't you see you're not getting anywhere?
     
  12. superluminal . Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,717
    JamesR,

    In another thread, I am ready to strangle Aer and MacM. Is there a way I can make their computers electrocute them?
     
  13. MacM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,104
    Anyone looking for a physics type rebuttal or discussion. They aren't getting it from him, they are getting unsupported and false innuendo only. The issues I have rasied are still there unanswered by physics.
     
  14. MacM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,104
    And we see what I am talking about.
     
  15. MacM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,104
    Calm down SL.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  16. superluminal . Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,717
    No. I hate you all.
     
  17. Aer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,250
    He went to go find Jesus in the religion forum

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  18. Rosnet Philomorpher Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    681
    I posted only because you requested an explanation. And how can it be the same as what you said, when you were referring to the new setup, and I, to the old one? And what you said was wrong, because there is no meaning in it 'looking' inertial.
     
  19. Aer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,250
    Nevermind! I was discussing superluminal's setup which shows the objects moving from each other's rest frames even though it has been decided that these rest frames are not inertial.
     

Share This Page