Star Wars vs Star Trek

Those calcs that have been shown time and again to be horribly flawed by multiple people including those on this forum you mean?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

We can disprove that ANY pieces went into hyperspace quite easily:

1) Hyperspace isn't realspace... thus, sheer speed can NOT force an object into HyperSpace... PERIOD.

2) If those pieces WERE moving that quickly, why didn't any hit the Death Star?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Ricery, just admit it - just as your name implies, you are a RICER - you act tough, even sometimes use a real fact or two, but in the end, you don't know the first thing of which you talk about, just like Ricers and their "souped up" civics...

And ICS is not high canon... if it's contradicted by the movies, it fails, just like anything else.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Name some proof. It's pretty clear you didn't know what EU was until you saw a ST vs SW debate.

It was that, or FTL speeds.

It states that it had shields.

 

First of it's Ricrery. Second, I've stated canon statements.

Pure lie! We never see it contradicted. Never... NEVER. NEVER! Except the powered down turbos in the OT. Also, even those that hate EU admit it's canon.

 

Cause they don't really contradict anything. Hell, the novelization for RotS states "whole worlds have burned", which implies BDZ.

 

yet we don't see it supported either. And for the nth time, it is canon....LOWER CANON.

 

Ha. First off, Halo fires gigatons to teratons, and I have yet to see megatons as standard for BSG. PROOF. Besides, they can glass planets in the span of an hour.

 

The first DS didn't have shields. There are two things to disprove this:

1. Nobody was sent to take it out.

2. No planet nearby had a shield generator.

 

So what if it had shields? If a sizable piece of a PLANET hits the DS at even NEAR light speed... it's game over. At the absolute least, it would have been mentioned.

 

Which aren't the one ship, single hour event that most believe it is.

 

Tell that to extremist Kittamaru.

 

We could burn the earth NOW... "whole worlds have burned" is as useful a statement for strength analysis as the statement "The power to destroy planets is insignificant next to the power of the force"... whoop dee doo... yet we NEVER see the force do anything all that impressive in the movies!

 

And the USS Defiant (Star Trek) can glass a planet in FIFTEEN MINUTES, as proven on screen.

 

He knows that.....that is what he is claiming too. It is lower canon that doesn't match the movies.

 

Incorrect, it did have shields. The kind that deflect weapons and maybe big ships, but not fighters.

 

I said it wasn't high cannon... how is that being an extremist?

 

say what? please clarify.....