SpuriousMonkey's Forum

wayyyyy too much estrogen in this tread

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Because the thread was about Spurious informing the members of his forum that he would prefer you not be invited to join.

Because it was you who, in Spurious's opinion, showed nothing but negativity. Perhaps the others with negative attitudes showed other redeeming traits? Regardless, it was simply Spurious expressing his opinion of you garnered from your reaction to his experiment. Not that you were the intended test subject, rather that you showed a great deal of rancor towards anyone would suggest polite and amicable behavior towards your enemy.

It wasn't. It had nothing to do with you.
Your rancor was simply noted as distasteful and unwelcome.

Maybe because Spurious didn't think of it until he did? Can't perform an experiment if it has not occurred to you to do so, can you?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

wait, sandy was that politically incorect hotie person, right? haha she was such a tool
she's purdy though

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Look, I can agree as much as the next person that Varda calling Sandy hot is pretty hot itself; but why exactly are you guys hammering on shorty now?

 

Nobody is 'hammering' Shorty. Just trying to explain to her that she is mistaken in her accusations.
It doesn't seem to be working though.

 

OK, fair enough I guess. I just hate to see women fighting. Unless they're in jello or syrup or mud or marmalade or something. Just to cushion the impacts, like. My primary concern is always their health. They should always be very healthy.

Noooo, I don't wanna! I want answers right now! I want 'em! I want 'em! I want 'em! *stomps feet angrily, throws toy, stomps off to room and slams door

 

I'll bet all the mods are mulling that last post over.

"Can we get rid of him now? Look what he said about women!"

"Lemme delete his post, that'll fix him!"

"Maybe we should give him another chance."

"Look, buy me a ticket to Philly and I promise you after a kick in the ball that he'll never make light of something so serious again."

I "meh" at you all.

 

now, where the hell is spuriousmonkey eh? that naughty, naughty boy

 

Since Spurious thinks I was part of the problem in Sci forums I just came across
a post by Sandy...well before i got here.

"Originally posted by Sandy"

If you look back to the beginning since I first came here, I did not insult anyone. I never personally attacked anyone. I was CRUCIFIED by attacks since day one--mostly from spuriousmonkey and his friends.

The sciwiki was fun for awhile. Then spur and his friends started calling me "whore of Jesus" and other VILE names. I finally fought back so now HE reports Me.

He hates me. I understand that. But the personal attacks need to stop. From him and everyone else.

 

He'a a troublemaker, by his own admission. He used to be an Ajax football hooligan. Says he got off on the buzz. I think he misses that sometimes.

 

Good god, this thread jumped 8 pages today? Sheesh! Ya'll are a bunch of babblin' brats.

I think you should all cool off by wrestling in a pool of jello or something.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

- N

 

Shorty,

Yes. Spurious was once one of her greatest detractors. He then began to question his behavior. He carried this questioning so far as to perform an experiment as to whether Sandy might not be as horrible as everyone thought.

Thus, you begin to see that you were not the root of his experiment. It was actually an exercise in self-awareness.

 

you'll be surprised to know that this has already been sugested... or maybe not

 

One of the few things Geoff and I can agree on..

- N