Skin Color and the Origin of Ancient Egyptians

Discussion in 'Science & Society' started by q0101, Aug 15, 2006.

  1. trueHistory Registered Member

    Messages:
    4
    for those who don't know in america, there was many white who were brought as slave in africa. Emperor of Mali (Musa) had white slaves..
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. TimeTraveler Immortalist Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,023
    Skin is the ugliest side of humanity. Fuck skin.
    In fact, all humans should be born blind so they can see better. The eye is the second most useless organ.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Count Sudoku Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,229
    Don't hold your breath.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Count Sudoku Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,229
    How about you blind yourself and tell us how that works out for you?
     
    Last edited: Nov 21, 2006
  8. Baron Max Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,053
    Geez, TT, it ain't just skin color that's the difference between whites and blacks! Where the hell have you been???? ...livin' in a cave?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Baron Max
     
  9. Baron Max Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,053
    Yeah, and not only that, but when America was first being settled, many people became "indentured" (basic slavery!) to Americans in order to fund their trip from England and Europe. They were little more than slaves for their period of indenture.

    Baron Max
     
  10. Count Sudoku Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,229
    According to TT skin color is the only difference between the races. Those race specific medications and illnesses are just a fiction of imagination and all the measured differences both physical and intellectual is either fiction made up by "racists" or the result of an unlimited number of environmental excuses.

    Oh, and race is a social construct...that can be categorized via a laboratory test with 99.7% accuracy.
     
    Last edited: Nov 23, 2006
  11. infoterror Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    377
    I agree with this. Also, if you want to have a society, it has to be of people of similar inclinations.

    White skin comes about through being exposed to the cold, which only smarter beings survive. That's why it is prized in every race, and every race has great variation in skin color (look at Northern to Southern African, and Northern Chinese to Thai).
     
  12. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    The fact that all so-called races can mate among each other to produce offspring indicates that all are part of the human syngameon, no separate supposed ancestral evolutionary links to the respective so-called races, as proponents of Darwinism often suggest, if not, out-right say.
     
  13. Satyr Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,896
    Funny….deniers of race often try to simplify the issue and make it easy.

    An Indian often has darker skin than a sub-Saharan African, yet we do not consider them part of the same racial group.

    Color is but an part of the total physical characteristics which differentiate between genetic population groups and which expose a heritage.
     
  14. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    So-called races of humans actually don't exist, the so-called races are merely subgroups of the human gene pool which naturally selected in their respective natural environments, white skin in the extreme latitudes, usually, and dard skin in the middle latitudes, usually, for example.

    Some tribes of the far North are dark skinned, they apparently came there as a dark-skinned group, with only genes for dark skin.

    And I believe the Berbers of the Sahara are rather light-skinned, so they apparently only had the genes for light skin, such is genetic variation within the human syngameon, according to environment and genes within the gene pools of the respective isolated groups.
     
  15. infoterror Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    377
    You're completely delusional. The ancient world was absolutely aware of race to a greater, finer degree than we are now. Otherwise, how do you explain the references in Tacitus and Plato to race and racial mixing (as being rare)?

    Not anticipating a high-IQ response!
     
  16. Chatha big brown was screwed up Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,867
    Were Ancient Egyptians Black or white?

    There is a lot of debate over whether ancient Egyptians were black or white. Historians have criss crossed over the idea endlessly but some fairly evident ideas seem to stem out from time to time. Some argue that the present day location of egypt isn't the same as the location of Egypt today...it goes on and on. So lets start the debate. Where ancient egytians black or white?
     
  17. spidergoat Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    51,925
  18. Walter L. Wagner Cosmic Truth Seeker Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,537
    until the caucasoid Greeks came along
     
  19. spidergoat Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    51,925
    But did they use any sun block? Maybe straw hats? If not, they would appear brown.
     
  20. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    The Ancient Egyptians were not Indo-European or Negroid. As discussed in another thread of similar purpose.
     
  21. Dr Lou Natic Unnecessary Surgeon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,574
    They were white people with dark skin. It's not complicated.
     
  22. Vega Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,392
    The Saidi people of egypt are the true indigenous people of that land. they are of nubian decent... they are brown skinned people. So the ancient eqyptians were BROWN!!!
     
  23. Chatha big brown was screwed up Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,867
    http://www.stewartsynopsis.com/physical_appearance_of_ancient_i.htm

    Fact -I think Ancient Egypt was full of mixed people, though I think the true original settlers from the beginning of time were brown skin. A testatment to support this "brown" people were the neigboring Nubians. Nubia was the alleged lower kingdom of Egypt(not excatly), and if you had a kingdom of pure black skin people right next to you its very impossibly by nature to have a settlement of pure white skin people living next to them. Climate isn't that isolated for such illogical evolutional differences to happen. In the Americas, Mexicans didn't always live right next to white United States, The U.S was in fact settled by native Indian, who looked like Mexicans and had similarities. Europeans Migrated to the United States, and my hunch is that they probably migrated to Ancient Upper Egypt. This is a scientific fact. Migration and reproduction was the main element to a developed white population in Egypt, which still inevitably died off from time to time.

    Fact- We know for a fact that Egyptian culture was very similar to Nubia and Extensively Ethiopia. We know there wer many prominent members of the Egyptian council who were black, including pharoahs, business men, and scientists. And we know that Egyptians called themselves "kemet", meaning black. This spotlights the influence of Nubian and Ethiopian influence amongst the people. Afteral Egypt is still part of Africa, and shares very many similarities. What this highlights is that they were more blacks than there were whites, afterall who wouldn't want to be an Egyptian citizen then? Towards the last days of Egypt, it became more and more apperantly black, which should support this theory.

    Fact- Egypt was known as the beginning of intellectual advancement. One of the most celebrated man in Egypt was Imhotep. Father of all medicine and architecture. He was black, if you look up his name its always synonymous with black, even his statue. In a way this signifies black population dominance in terms of socio-economic, because to learn to read and write then you had to be a of the right circles.

    Fact- Many and too many biblical scriptures insinuate that theywere black or brown. And brown from that region is considered black for one main reason; There are many variations of black people. In fact one reaosn why scientists believe life started in Africa is because Africans had a more diverse genetic make-up than anywhere else in the world. Which is why brown is considered black. Of cause this is debatable, its like saying birds originated from South America because there are more varieties of birds there...again, its debatable.

    We would never know whether Ancient Egypt was White, but we know for sure it wasn't and couldn't have been pure white, more like Indo-Aryan. The real people distorting this issue are the race supremists and domination advocates. Of cause history is written by the victor, and the language of the victor. Everytime a barbaric group of Conquerers ravage a town the first thing they go for is the libraries and literature, anything that has anyhting to do with identity. Its standard procedure. Napoleon, Khan, Hitler, Robert Mugabe, Idi Amin, Mao, Richard the lionheart, all did it. But we are at least left with some mystery, mystery build by the hands of men, we are left with the enchantment of Ancient Egypt. There's nothing wrong with that either. For the sake of solidarity and sanity, I think its better to call Egypt a black country, afterall they themselves chose to call themselves kemet, meaning "dark".


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imhotep
    http://www.theblacklist.net/Feature/DE-Imhotep.htm
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2006

Share This Page