Singularity Vs Quantum Theory of Gravity

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by RajeshTrivedi, Feb 15, 2015.

  1. RajeshTrivedi Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,476
    I cannot share till they are published !! As I said one will be in the March 2015 Edition...second is under review process....By the way please share some information about yourself.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647

    No, that's the truth. Some very dicey ones who are recognised as less than stringent about what they publish.
    http://vixra.org/ is one example.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. RajeshTrivedi Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,476
    I told you many a times, you dont read..you just copy paste...Read the OP of the thread, I have myself put the same in Alternative Theory...should you not apologize ?
     
  8. RajeshTrivedi Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,476
    I told you many a times, you dont read..you just copy paste...Read the OP of the thread, I have myself put the same in Alternative Theory...should you not apologize ?
     
  9. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647

    Best of luck.
    My view is that going on what you have claimed here, going on how you have side-stepped issues, going on the lying that you are continually posting, going on the fact you do not accept links, going on the fact that you take most of your stuff out of context, going on all that, I see you "publishing a scientific paper" as just one big joke.
    It's about time someone informed you that all you have is an ego, and an inflated one.
    But like I said, best of luck
     
  10. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647

    Yep, I copy and paste...reputable stuff...while you cherry pick and take out of context.
    With the thread, yep you put it in "Alternative section"after you were shamed for dishonestly starting another thread in the sciences section, and been reminded there, that you should be elsewhere.
    And yes, I 'll apologise whenever I see you as deserved of an apology.
    I won't hold my breath though.
     
  11. RajeshTrivedi Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,476
    You are an incorrigible [choose the expletive].
     
  12. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,070
    And... why exactly "can't" you mention the name of this supposed reputable scientific journal?

    What exactly do you think will happen if you say the name?
     
  13. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647
    A question that I must ask.
    Why are you so adverse against any copy and pastes?
    Afterall on the one or two occasions you have found something that has remotely supported your stance, you have done it yourself.
    Most of my copy and pastes are from Universities...so why do you reject them?
    Just a bit hypocritical I suggest, considering that you have cherry picked the odd quotes from a couple of our professors when it suits you.

    Anyway as long as you continue with your lambasting of accepted BH cosmology, I'll keep up with the links as I see fit.

    And in relation to that, don't you see even more hypocrisy, as you are totally unqualified to suggest that the mainstream stance and accepted theory is wrong. To suggest that you can rewrite 20th/21st century cosmology, is just plain crazy.
    Then you wonder why I say you have delusions of grandeur!
     
  14. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647
    What you think of me is of no concern to me.
    I have simply stated the truth.
    I questioned you at least three times about alternative claims you were making in one of your threads that was posted in Physics and Maths from memory.
     
  15. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647
     
  16. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647
    deleted double post
     
  17. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647
    deleted double post again
     
  18. RajeshTrivedi Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,476
    You undervalue yourself Paddo ! I can see you are too owed even by people.....who have no clear understanding of the subject.....Think out of Box, man, think how you can take the Schrodinger Cat out of that well ! Do not worry about the fact that people will laugh at you ! There will always be morons who will let you down, who will denigrate you, who will tease you. They only know the language of stupidity. Start with a small contribution, and then gradually increase. Incidentally I know about Vixra.org and I have not sent my paper there. And incidentally I have read none of these books......they are generally meant for larger audience.
     
  19. Kittamaru Now nearly 40 pounds lighter. Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,466
    My reaction to the recent happenings in this thread

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  20. OnlyMe Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,914
    What is going on is the same thing that goes on in every thread Rajesh starts/gets into.
     
  21. OnlyMe Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,914
    The only reason not to mention the name of the journal is either that there is no journal or it is not a credible journal. When you cannot present an credible argument on an open forum like this, it is incredible that you claim you have a paper that has been accepted for publication in a credible journal.., especially when you admit you have only been interested in cosmology for about a year.

    Most credible journals would not even review a paper submitted with credentials like, And I have developed some interest in cosmology for last a year or so...

    Since you seem now to claim the following is your original composition, please provide some credible reference(s) that support the conclusions you present by cramming together bits and pieces from GR and QM, that no one else seems to be able to do. Rajesh, even credible papers on the formation and composition of a neutron star are theoretical. Given that.., any transition from a neutron star to a black hole cannot be anything but theoretical.
    Three pages back I asked you to answer a straight forward question,
    This was your answer which is no answer at all. Unless your true intent is a rejection of the concept of black holes entirely, or you are just trolling a theology in the a science thread.

    If it were my decision you would get a vacation from posting in the science sections, but to be honest the way your comments have drug down the whole discussion, perhaps the thread would have to be moved.

    Provide some credible reference that supports anything of your claims...
     
  22. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647
    I'm owed by no one. Common sense and logic will always tell you, that in general what mainstream science accepts is the most obvious based on evidence.
    I don't really need to think "outside the box" just to show I can think outside the box. I don't really need to wear my ability to think outside the box, like a "badge of honour". I find that rather superficial, especially when like you, I am not professionally qualified to question those that are.
    Looking into the cosmological sciences for a year, [in your case] or even reading a multitude of books over a decade in my case, does not trump the professionals.
    Oh yeah baby, I certainly think outside the box, but I'm also big enough and ugly enough to know that until I have irrefutable evidence to either support my model, or irrefutable evidence to invalidate the incumbent model, I will only ever have speculative hypothesis at best.
    Plus of course the areas I do think outside the box on, are areas of science that as yet does not have any answers for...eg: spacetime before t+10-43 seconds.



    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Rather ironic I must say, since I don't think people are laughing at me.
    I simply accept the scientific method and proper peer review, and remain open for change based on further observations.
    Again, as appears to be the case with most alternative hypothesis pushers, I don't need to wear my ability to think for myself, or outside the box, like a badge of honour, nor have I an inflated ego.
    I accept I'm a learner, I respect those that are professional, even if I disagree with them, and I certainly accept the validity of reputable links, as well as professional replies to questions asked.

    Let me finish with the following statement....
    There is certainly the possibility and a non zero chance of the next revolution/change in cosmology, to appear from someone out in left field, or even someone like myself who has no professional qualifications.
    But considering the technological advances and state of the art satellites, probes, including ground based equipment as well as the myriad of space craft, that are only accessed by professionals, that chance is very small.
    Like it or not, those are the facts and I suggest we all accept that.
     
  23. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647
    Correction, previous post:
    I'm owed by no one, should be, I'm owned by no one.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     

Share This Page