Hm, I dare say you are either illiterate, or attempting to troll... how droll. Allow me to open your eyes. MR Posted: A little context: In several previous threads, MR has taken to simply IGNORING evidence that stands in opposition to his position; be this because he knows he cannot sufficiently explain it or otherwise, he has ignored it. (as a recent example - the bigfoot thread, and his refusal to answer for how the creature could possibly procreate given the lack of genetic diversity) I replied: MR's reply: Now, he is entitled to his opinion; however, just as in the criminal justice system, your opinion on the ruling does not, by itself, excuse yourself from said ruling. Then you come along and claim and So, again I say - point out where I have misrepresented what MR is saying.