Seagypsy got banned?

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by phlogistician, Nov 22, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. phlogistician Banned Banned

    There's an allegation of sock puppetry, but her and Neverfly were partners, so would share an IP even if using different devices through their home router. What gives here?

    I don't come here because the moderation is really poor, and all I see when I check in, is poor moderation.

    If people are sick of over moderation, try where there is _zero_ moderation of content, bar hacks and spam. Really, you can call someone a c*nt if you want to. It's for people with backbones, so be warned.
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  3. Buddha12 Valued Senior Member

    I see that it was just started. Was it you who got it up and running? You do know there's other forums that have been around where they went to don't you?
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  5. scheherazade Northern Horse Whisperer Valued Senior Member

  6. Guest Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  7. Captain Kremmen All aboard, me Hearties! Valued Senior Member

    A C*nt?
    If it's not moderated, why not call someone a cunt instead?
  8. R1D2 many leagues under the sea. Valued Senior Member

    Maybe not only did a similar IP address as her husband. Which was discussed when she first joined. But her comment on 11-18-12,*at 03:40 AM seagypsy replied to a thread " What is up with the moderator vendetta against Gustav?" in Site Feedback.
    Kittamaru, being able to alter one's own browser is one of the most elementary skills of any web developer. creating custom style sheets and custom...(Yada,Yada) aid in getting her banned.

    seagypsy banned by Plazma Inferno! On 11-18-12 may return, Never. Reasons: sock puppet, trying to modify/hack forum software, threats to other members....

    Well I do wish she was not really gone, gone from here but what's done is done. And it more than likely won't be undone.

    On here watch what you say. Your comments could end up getting you banned.
  9. KilljoyKlown Whatever Valued Senior Member

    seagypsy got a raw deal in this forum. She is neither a sock puppet nor a hacker. I admit it's a bit unusual for both a husband and wife to post on the same forum, but I would sure like to see what evidence the decision to ban her was based on. I know her and Bells seemed to have a running battle going, and she blames Bells for her getting banned and she denies the charges made against her. I believe her.
  10. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Well, yeah. If you don't play by the rules.
    We are usually pretty damn lenient around here. Just look at how long Gustav lasted, for instance.
    That said, I haven't really follewed this case in detail.
  11. Randwolf Ignorance killed the cat Valued Senior Member

    This one was just wrong though Enmos. She was new - everyone thinks they can change things when they first come here but most give up after a few years (or get permabanned - I would imagine RealityCheck is next). I warned SeaGypsy via PM that she and her husband would end up on the ban list. Didn't take long. God forbid that she should modify her browser to exclude Bells. You do realize this place is down to about 20 regular posters, right? You lose Tiassa, James or someone similar and it's all she wrote. Something to do with sheep goes here...
  12. scheherazade Northern Horse Whisperer Valued Senior Member

    I haven't been hanging around enough lately to have the lay of the land on this issue so in that regards I'll keep my cud to myself.

    However, it does beg the question of why I haven't been hanging around much lately... I don't contribute a great deal to the science here beyond some personal observations and I will
    invest considerable time researching topics of interest to post links that may interest others but in that regard I am not a lot different from a number of posters.

    The perception is that the game is a little off, and perception IS reality to the viewer.

    I sincerely hope that synergy returns to this place for the days of the science forums are already under siege with all the distractions of the social media and entertainment technology endeavoring to short circuit any remaining abilities of inductive and deductive reasoning or attempts to communicate same. :shrug:
  13. R1D2 many leagues under the sea. Valued Senior Member

    Since you mentioned me my friend.
    I see some being banned rightly and some wrongly. Seagypsy in my own opinion was wrongly banned. I am not fully saying she completely followed the rules. But being banned from returning for what she did don't fully make sense. And I am not arguing with you. You have not followed this case in full complete detail. Seagypsy was married to neverfly. Same IP. She would not really hack this place imo. I don't know her skills, but it would seem hard to know just how to do that with out some mod access "codes". And shit I would not even know what to do let alone how to begin, in a hacking unless it was coughing. And yes, some are very lenient to begin with.

    If you Enmos are so inclined. Look into this matter more. And clue us in how she received 1 ban. A never return ban. And how it came across she did all she was claimed to have done. Several here just would like to know. As I heard said "inquiring minds want to know"....
  14. leopold Valued Senior Member

    just shows how petty this place has become.
    what's with the auto save?
    more pettyness?

    science site my ass.
    shillforums is a more apt analogy where personal websites rule.
  15. Balerion Banned Banned

    I would love to see where she threatened anyone, because I don't buy it. She was not Neverfly, so I don't know where the sock puppet is supposed to have come from. And the modification was done to her browser, not to the forum servers, so I don't know where the ban comes from.

    I think Bells just bitched to the right people about having her precious feelings hurt, and they cooked up some BS to get the girl banned.

    But yeah, protect Bells and Co as they sink this forum into oblivion.
  16. Tiassa Let us not launch the boat ... Staff Member

    Mod Hat — Closure and redirect

    Mod Hat — Closure and redirect

    Closed for solicitation; redirected as appropriate.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page