This thread http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=62339 brings up something I've been wondering about. Why is samcdkey embraced by western liberals of sciforums? The fact she bashes the west and makes excuses for the east like a western liberal doesn't make her the same when she's indian. She has more in common with prince james, baron max, or myself. An indian equivalent of a western liberal would hope america succeeded in iraq and then went on to invade india. They'd constantly mock india and indian people, not be so flagrantly nationalist and patriotic as samcdkey. She's a good ol' boy. Her racist topic would have been created to support goodey and point out how india has some nerve being outraged when it's such a "backwards racist cesspit" (an indian liberal's words, not mine). I just see a double standard, the western equivalent to samcdkey would be seen as a "knuckle dragger", but sciforum's has conditioned her to think she's some kind of enlightened new age hippy liberal type because she agrees with them. No, if you're indian and you hold similar views to people like genji and jamesr you're a savage racist with a rose coloured view of your people and culture and an open hostility towards the west (at least, this is how you would generally be seen by sciforums if they wanted to be consistent). You are (correctly, I might add) on your countries side, which means there is a difference of elemental significance between you and your friends here.