The usual lie. Because I have not "carefully omitted" the representation, but explicitly discussed it: You may disagree with the argument, no problem, but to quote the sentence after this consideration, deleting the consideration itself, and then saying that I "most carefully omit the necessary representation" is simply a lie. Which is followed by some wild fantasy: I see a lot of coercion, deception, and media propaganda, and I have no problem to see its role in establishing governance today almost everywhere. Nothing specific to fascist governance, for democratic governance deception and media propaganda is even more essential. Because you are among the most gullible of posters here, in the face of sophisticated American fascist agitprop. You fall for the dumbest stuff those guys put out. Your invented revisions of the meanings of English words is not entertaining enough to be worth posting. The rest of us would prefer to address thread topics, using a common vocabulary - which in the case of fascism, is difficult enough to maintain without your bs muddling things. Yes. And that's why I do not name every state which has the economic system of fascism a fascist state. Nice techniques. Misinterpreting my texts in horrible ways, and then accusing me to have made the trivial logical errors necessary for such a misinterpretation.