I have grown up in a community which has not had any problem making a lot of predictions. Unfortunately, they have failed completely. I decided to ignore predictions made on a similar base. It was not false. There were no other strong forces. No, less warmongering than Clinton, in this question on the other side of Trump. You know, in a reliable, normal society Trump would be named an extreme warmonger, for his relation to Iran. It is only in the perverse situation of the US that such a warmonger looks, in comparison with almost all the other candidates like a peace dove. This is what the available situation tells me. There is not too much information about it. Known facts are that the SA-Qatar conflict is an old one, so to accuse Trump of inventing or creating the conflict would be stupid. "Allowed" is simply on the safe side, nothing is known of Trump trying to prevent it. "Doing nothing" was only a shortcut for "doing nothing to help the people in Yemen". Using here "allowing" would not make sense. The notion that the US does nothing to help them is easy to get, if you know which side the US supports in the conflict. Probably "doing something for the Yemen people" for you is something like some cosmetic modifications of the support. So, let's see what happened near the end of Obama administration: Propaganda fantasies about Putin's illegal billions in the West endangered by the Magnitsky Act disposed. You need no propaganda to tell the Russian people that sanctions together with low oil price can cause some problems. What the government has done in this situation was sufficiently successful: The sanctions continue, the oil price remains low, but the crisis is over, the inflation is actually on a low since 1991. Crime syndicates play no longer a political role, this was a problem in the past. I would recommend you to read less Western propaganda about Russia.