Richard Dawkins vs Wendy Wright

Discussion in 'Biology & Genetics' started by deicider, Oct 16, 2010.

  1. jpappl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,985
    Children ask good questions.

    Can you answer the childish question ?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. jpappl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,985
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. spidergoat Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    51,949
    That is far beyond the time frame we are talking about with the evolution of mankind.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    It does seem that J99 simply denies any evidence presented, without thought or examination.
     
  8. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    See, here is a perfect example of people seeing ahwt they want to see.

    Forget about the "canine teeth". Its really that simple.
     
  9. M00se1989 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    508
    Lets just do an experiment where we teach children in one class evolution and all things are made of light. In another class teach them philosophy and religious morals. Put them all in the same class and teach them nuclear physics, without telling them about an H bomb or an A bomb and they would probably blow themselves up arguing over a bunch of things "nobody can prove".
     
  10. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    Which is not a response to my question\statement.

    Why would i do that?
     
  11. jpappl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,985
    Like I thought, you have no answer.

    Why do we have hair ?
     
  12. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    Well i am thinking...how, how can this be? An ark with animals on it to reproduce and populate the planet? Or is this really a reference to seeding?
     
  13. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    Your question HAS been answered. Weather you like the answe or not is of no consequence.

    Because our ancestors had hair.
     
  14. jpappl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,985
    I don't like the answer because you never gave an answer to the bleeping question. :bugeye:

    That said. You answered.

    "Because our ancestors had hair. "

    How far back do you think that goes ?

    I assume you question the validity of evolution.
     
  15. keith1 Guest

    Search:
    "DARWIN BARNACLE"
    "BARNACLE"
    "HERMAPHRODITE BARNACLE"
    "EPIZOIC BARNACLE"

    These are live examples of intertidal species that are clearly evolved from plankton. One doesn't need to look at fossils to prove evolution is going on.

    next.
     
  16. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    On Earth?

    I raelly wont say in any definitive way but in the presesnt incarnation i will say a few thousand years.

    What kind of evolution?
     
  17. jpappl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,985
    A few thousand years ?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Put down the pipe and walk away. It's late wherever you are.
     
  18. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    Over one thousand and less than 10K.
     
  19. jpappl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,985
    Ok then.

    :runaway:
     
  20. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    Can you prove that wrong?
     
  21. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    The fossil record proves you wrong.
     
  22. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    pappl, did someone pm you in the past ten minutes?
     
  23. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    Not if the fossil record is off whereas the millions are actually thousands.
     

Share This Page