"Dear EmptyForceOfChi, You have received a warning at SciForums.com. Reason: ------- Trolling / Meaningless Post Content Last chance. I don't care if you think you've talked to God. That doesn't mean you can start 100 meaningless threads on sciforums. If you continue to post this kind of crap, you'll be banned.." What 100's of off Topic meaningless Threads have I started?. Also how can a Thread in its Original Post be off Topic or truly meaningless. In What Terms Are you Using the word Meaning-less?, as To imply that they do not mean anything to you as an individual? or to anybody reading them?. Would you please Quote and cite My meaningless threads So I can better understand and avoid being "Banned" Thank you James R for your pointing out of Violations of Sci-Forums Rules as a Diligent Sub-Moderator. Peace.
I dunno, sci is pretty "light" these days, you are just overwhelming the board. I wish the same warning would go out to the American posters, who mind-numbingly bash the opposite party demigods/members. So fuckin bored of that shit.
1. You don't have to read every thread. 2. Instead of crying about the lack of interesting threads, why don't you start a couple of new ones? P.S.: Sorry about getting offtopic.
I don't read them, I don't read all of Chi's threads either. I don't think he deserved the threat from the mod OR I think some politicos need to also get threatened.
How many ppl INside America follow the Super Bowl? I for one, have taken to calling it the Stupor Bowl. It describes several different levels. The amount of attention and misplaced concern over who wins is pathetic.
You mean, you wish they would talk "adult" politics instead of being a bunch of predictable schoolchildren? I hear ya.
What would be funny maybe is if I were to Purchase Sci-Forums and remove certain mods ^_^. Am I joking Am I serious?, Who knows. Peace.
I warned you after the first 10 or so. I didn't want it to get to hundreds. A good example is the one for which the warning was given. Totally meaningless. How you could expect anybody to respond is a mystery. No worries, mate. Meh. Whatever.
Ah - is this the sport where the winner is declared the "World Champion" despite the competition not being open to teams in any other country? Much like their "World Series" baseball... although that was won by a Canadian team in 92 and 93, I think... but that is the only non-American team, iirc.
I seriously didn't think I was violating any rules in all honesty. I did expect a real debate to be held on the probability factors, Even if we have no physical evidence I still think Mathematics is a valid language to debate in. Our calculations can delve further than our scientific machines and apparatus. I searched for about 10 mins to no avail, I couldnt even find the net worth of sci-forums :shrug: Peace.
An event somewhat like that took place in my immediate environs - except the theme was sampling a wide variety of soups in small quantities rather than a Tub O' Soup. No talentless retards performed at the intermission, though. Hey ! I'd watch more cricket if it was on TV more often ! I need to see about a hundred more games before I'll be able to understand what the hell is going on ! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Only a hundred? Hell, I've played cricket (it was compulsory at school) and I still don't have a clue...
