QM Many Worlds Interpretation

RJBeery said:
We're going to have to agree to disagree on the point because I feel that if an interpretation (or theory) required infinite energy in any form, in any realm, whether observable or not, it deserves a jaundiced eye.
Click to expand...

No---you're not right. There is a right answer and there is a wrong answer, and your answer is not right.
 
BenTheMan said:
No---you're not right. There is a right answer and there is a wrong answer, and your answer is not right.
Click to expand...
Bold statement. I'm abandoning the #3 objection due to what Pandaemoni correctly identified as semantic differences. Plus the Magic Leprechaun just told me that conservation of energy is an illusion in any world. I still seek any input on objections #1 and #2 though. Thanks in advance!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top