Clue, what was stolen out of the pyramids, and why were the other treasures left behind - like the much coveted gold etc? What was so much more important than the artifacts collected by subsequent robberies?
G.K. The pyramids are thousands of years old. We won't know nothing for 100% certainty. An what pyramid are you talking about. That had gold left after plundering.
stones were teleported via a stargate by the Egyptians, the stargate was brought by slaves Jews on their backs. To hide the evidence of slave abuse, the Jews were teleported to another dimension. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! exiled Jews who made the pyramids...decided to make their own civilization on the moons of Jewpiter Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! the civilization soon fell after the extremists from Gaza invaded these colonies...but the last of the Jewish astronauts remained alive to tell the story... Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!... " ? הלעג קציצות מישהו "
Gerhard can you post some "evidence" regarding your information,that you came up with. THE Pyramids, being plundered an gold left at Giza, I have never heard this before... I can't find any of that information just yet. An there are Hundreds of pyramids. "The pyramids" I thought encompassed all of the ones found.
What happened at Giza, also took place in other pyramids and burial sites, where the items we would call valuable were left behind and yet the tombs were plundered. Things like the jade suit in a Chinese tomb. Of course, other places have been robbed for just the obvious treasures like precious metals etc. The pyramids of Giza had already been robbed before the modern archaeologists got to them. Some Arabs dug a tunnel into them in 820 AD. Because there was no body in the box in the upper chamber, they assumed it had been robbed before. The question is not really about whether a robbery took place or not, but what was taken and why? I have already pasted clues and names everywhere in this forum, under various topics to avoid the cesspool.
By the way, most pyramids all over the world had a similar function - initially. What happened later, is what most archaeologists agree on, but almost none of them know why and how they were built. That's why there are so many ideas around as posted before.
I thought Pyramid was done when the link was connected to Orion or something like that...10,000 or 10,500 BC??? Looking at http://www.world-pyramids.com/ I think they were airports in a past generation whose time has not been developed thinking that it is impossible to define them...
A few things.... First... Pouring stone and/or advanced machining are both not accepted as Historical, and should be in pseudoscience. However I do believe that the Pyramids have been machined and not poured as evidenced here by Christopher Dunn.. http://www.gizapower.com/pma/index.htm Christopher Dunn has made a few very remarkable reverse Engineering faults with the pyramids, and anybody interested in the pyramids shold view this video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAMRUGqssdA&feature=relmfu The entire video series and his website is interesting if you believe in ancient technologies of any sort.
kwhilborn thank you for providing a link. I looked at it an I can't fathom how all those cuts were made. An it would have taken a long time to sand an polish as well as cut those stones to that manner. In witch I "hypothesize". My "hypothesis" uses a metal tool an lots of sand an rock bits. An little water. But I have not heard anyone publish a idea like that. An the way I "hypothesize" includes sanding an polishing. But for some of the angles in the pictures it would be way more than challenging to replicate.
@ R1D2, The second link I provided above is for an Engineer named Christopher Dunn. He has written several books about the pyramids and makes a lot of sense. Especially concerning the electrodes in the shafts. Hydrogen WAS created in the "queens chamber" for whatever unknown reason. If you watch the above video you will see that seems clear, but I think you should start that video series from the beginning if you are interested in pyramid tech. Here is the first link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Pf76422Pbk although I think the fourth video has the most "meat" and can convince most is this video # 4 in the series (as linked above in previous post.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAMRUGqssdA&feature=relmfu I think Christopher Dunn has proved that the Egyptians were aware of some thing we were not. I would like to make another comment about the Egyptians as well. The Egyptian empire was very old and this confuses many. You must remember that the pyramids were as old to King Tut and Cleopatra, as the ancient Roman ruins are to us. There could have been large gaps in knowledge that was passed down. The above (previous in thread) drawing of people pulling a statue on logs could have been eyewitnessed, or it could have been a guess. We do not know. We can carbon date plant life between layers of stone in Egypt, however it has been argued that our carbon dating processes could be very flawed. Some have surmised that the egyptians found the pyramids and we are confusing several cultures. This is how I mean the age of the Egyptian culture can confuse Archeologists. I have seen some people argue that the sphinx was underwater at one point. It is confusing. I am satisfied that Christopher Dunn is doing everything he can to figure things out s I will happily wait for his thrid book and read about it then.
Videos are a little hard to watch on my phone but I will try to getting around to look at them. Thank you K. I also had heard that Napoleon had uncovered most of the giza "monuments" out of the sands. So I would assume that they could have been buried before an uncovered. Although with all the "writings" you would speculate there would have been some record of "discovery" an how they were made. But some things will always be lost to the sands of time. Egypt may have been the Atlantis everyone has been looking for. It may have just changed a lot over "time". An Atlantis may not be described correctly...
I watched the fourth video and I didn't think it had any substance at all, just a description of the Great Pyramid and some scoffing at conventional ideas. There was some speculation about chemical reactions at the end so the fifth video might have more to say on that - but based on what I've seen so far, I'm not much inclined to waste any more time on it.
I am surprised. You did not find it interesting that several of the tubes leading to the "Queens chamber" were used to create hydrogen within the pyramid. They even found eroded electrodes at the ends of these shafts. You were not intrigued as to why the queens chamber had continued building "air shafts" after the burial chamber was switched to a higher level? You did not find it interesting that there was some explosive (hydrogen) force within the kings chamber as to move the walls an inch while the shaft built from outside the pyramid to underneath was straight within the thickness of a thumbnail, there was no possibility an earthquake could move one and not the other. You did not find it interesting that the "grand hall" is a resonating chamber? The pyramid was some sort of machine. I am sorry if you did not grasp this from the fourth video. Still; I cannot fathom anybody who has an interest in Egypt not wishing to watch the entire series a Christopher Dunn is an Engineer and has spent many years examining them up close. Some of the granite vases/decanters constructed in Egypt had narrow necks and much larger hollow bases. Even with our technology today we would be very hard pressed to replicate such things. I think the Egyptians had technology that we did not as they evolved more spiritually, but they had less population and had less technology than us. I think they had better sound technology, and contrary to most scientific opinion understood our spiritual nature. I cannot imagine how you watched that 4th video and were not impressed by the logic, but you are entitled to your opinion. Anybody else care to watch that 4th video and comment? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAMRUGqssdA&feature=relmfu here it is again.
I didn't see a shred of evidence for any of that. All I saw was idle speculation. There was no logic presented. It was just a description of the strucure with, "That's odd," inserted here and there and then BANG! the conclusion that it's a machine. Don't get me wrong. I think it would be great if the ancient Egyptians had some unknown technology - but that video doesn't show any.
I still have not seen this video (because I'm on a phone). I do believe that if people could prove that what they say of Egyptian things. Like pyramids being machines. Through a full recreation, with factual period items. Instead of hypothesis. And plain words they would be more believable.
The chemical residues are another thing not related to the use of chemicals in the pyramids at any stage. But the resonating chamber is correct, and the pyramids could be called machines, more like instruments. There are three mysteries - what were they used for, how were they built and how did they work. All those questions can be answered by an understanding of how matter operates. Several comments you made are intuitive and correct.
G.K. I understand enough about harmonics. There is a study I heard about a while back that uses sound to "power" a plane. Wild theory. But I will admit I've seen a small scale version. Neat was my first thought. But I don't think it could be used large scale any time in my life or the next.
It is not the harmonics of sound waves, although that aspect is brought into it at the start. Matter operates on the similar principles of sound, except it is an oscillation within two complex forces. Every atom and every component of an atom has a rhythm or beat. Atoms can be induced to beat at a different speed, which changes their relation to what we call a normal space time function. It can change the weight, inertia, malleability, any physical property. So its not just about sound waves, it is changing the way matter itself operates. Sound is one of the things used to cause atoms to jump into the next mode. So it is a simple technology, that could have been put together quite easily by the ancients, who were twenty times more intelligent than modern man. When I say simple technology, I don't mean that it was simple to make correctly, let alone to use it. It involved an understanding of the position of all the celestial bodies, hence the importance of astrology/astronomy in ancient cultures. The reason for this, is that the universe is governed by what I best describe as backgound forces, which are not only responsible in the operation and existence of atoms but of every large scale object and movement, which change in their relative position to the earth and each other, affecting the potentials and activities of all atoms. It was a matter of knowing what happens to atoms when, these celestial bodies changed their position, and then capitalising on those opportunities, which indeed are very specific. Such knowledge has been acquired by specialists in atomic weapons, who found that during a test in the Pacific the atomic device failed to work, and they had to wait for the moon to be in a certain phase before the process of reaching critical mass could continue.
