Putin propagates hateful gay stereotype

Do you seriously believe that the clownish depictions of sexual behavior in these parades are significant fodder for erotic stimulation of viewers of any age? Such rare experiences are dwarfed by the accessibility of real and virtual sexual imagery available daily to most adults and children.

Maybe we should restrict access to these objects of sexual obsession as well.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Despite what is depicted on various right wing websites and FOX News reports, sexuality is not the sole focus of gay pride parades. Some of them are downright pedestrian (i.e. the "God loves queers" section of the San Diego pride parade.)

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I guess that would justify violent riots?

 

This is an amazingly ignorant argument. Nothing about nuns is overtly sexual, and if nuns turn you on, that is your own paraphilia.

 

Who said anything about "erotic stimulation of viewers of any age", you pervert? And do you honestly assume, what, that all objects of paraphilia are somehow inherently sexual?

Paraphilia describes the experience of intense sexual arousal to atypical objects, situations, or individuals. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraphilia​

If it is overt.

"Section" of the pride parade? Why only a "section"?

 

Apparently this guy did.

They obviously are to some people. Does this explain why a gay man exposing his penis leads to teen pregnancy?

Wouldn’t you consider viewing exposed genitals at a gay pride parade an atypical situation for most people?

 

Again, who said anything about "erotic stimulation of viewers of any age", you pervert? Nothing about overtly sexual behavior teaching children that such is acceptable presumes stimulation, only that it is acceptable and perhaps even expected when they become sexually mature or interested. It is about teaching it as a norm of expression, by example, to impressionable young minds.

That you would equate lessons about sexual behavior with sexual stimulation is disturbing. Do you also assume sex-ed is "erotic stimulation"?

You obviously cannot read. I said "inherent" which is not dependent upon the proclivities of "some people". Overtly sexual behavior is an example young adults will emulate.

Nudity is not an atypical object of sexual arousal. Work on that reading comprehension.

 

What exactly did they teach you in sex ed? Unless you’re the product of artificial insemination, there was likely the usual element of eroticism involved in your conception.

If there wasn’t something inherently unique to those objects they wouldn’t be relevant to the obsession.

So if you were to parade down the street exposing your genitals, would you expect bystanders to approach to engage in sexual intercourse? Or, have you ever been lucky enough to encounter a young woman parading topless down a street willing to engage in sex with you? Do you really think emulating such behaviors are common or effective methods used to establish sexual relationships?

But for children to witness and be aroused by it in a gay pride parade is.

 

What wrong with nudity in front of children? I was thinking Putin meant gays rape children, not that their gay pride parades was damaging to children's psyche!

I think the problem here is the idea that children should be kept in ignorance of sex for as long a possible, why?

 

Why is there an indecent exposure law ?

More to the point . If you have a 10 year old daughter would it be agreeable with you to have sex or be exposed to sexual activity ?

 

Because people are prudes?

I don't think I would have a problem with her knowing of it, or seeing it on occasion, she going to see crazy shit eventually and it would be best if I'm their to teach her context and how to deal with it.

"Dad, faggots are screwing on the sidewalk again!"
"Oh see Dipshit (That the name I have picked out for my future daughter) they are allowed to do that every since they got equal rights, all the fears of the Christians were right and gays just fuck publicly all over the place now, usually in front of wholesome heterosexual couples with kids just like us.. now Dipshit be a dear and get me my crack pipe, dad needs his fix."

 

I suppose our views are different . If we are majority we create such laws and the law should be respected . It does not mean you have right to expose yourself and your family , that is why there are some designated nudity camps.

 

Majority of people once made slavery legal, burning of heretics, etc, etc, what the majority of people want is not necessarily right simply because it is the majority opinion (appeal to popularity). Sure the law should be respect on so far as not to go to jail, but nudist colonies exist for those that find fault with just vain laws.

Legally within my own house I could walk around naked in front of my kids.

 

I certainly was not "stimulated". Most young adults find sex-ed a bit embarrassing or funny, being taught by an adult. If your teacher "aroused" you that would seem to be a personal issue, and if intentional, could be legally actionable.

You really have no clue.

in·her·ent
1.
existing in something as a permanent, essential, or characteristic attribute.​

How does someone's personal obsession add "a permanent, essential, or characteristic attribute" to an object? If everyone does not agree that an object has said quality than it is not an inherent quality. Period.

Crack a dictionary.

What the fuck are you on about? Who said ANYTHING about emulating the exact behavior (i.e. nudity in a parade) to "establish sexual relationships"?

First, overtly sexual behavior is not solely limited to nudity, as I have previous cited bump-and-grinding, etc.. Second, overt sexual behavior can be seen as a norm by the young and impressionable, which can lead women to view themselves as solely sexual objects, among other things.

If you thing people viewing themselves as sexual objects is an effective method for establishing healthy sexual relationships, then again, that sounds like a personal problem.

Again, who said anything about child arousal (except you, of course)? Pervert.

Nudity is not necessarily overtly sexual. No need for children to be kept ignorant either, especially as they start becoming sexually mature, but their exposure should be reasonably monitored. I mean, most people do not think porn is appropriate sex-ed, because is depicts unrealistic and risky behavior.

Who said "different"? Simulating sex is obviously overt, and heterosexuals do not generally have parades celebrating their sexuality.

You sick pervert! Again, like Capracus, why do you leap to the assumption that emulation would require immediate sexual arousal?

Perverts!

Masturbation is typically private, hence not overt.

Again, why assume immediate sexual arousal, pervert? Can you really just not imagine anything between completely innocuous and complete depraved? I am talking about behavior the impressionable may see as a norm, and latter emulate.

Straw man. Who said anything about "catching" gay?

 

What does that have to do with the price of cheese? I can walk around naked in from of my kids and I can choose to press charges or not on anyone the flashes by kids, etc, etc, (assuming I would have kids or for starters have sex consistently with women and without money being involved.)

Some pornos, some pornos teach that even fat obese people wear condoms, at least when fudge packing (got to keep clean, right?) or what ever fold their violating. So it all depends on the porno. But yes children should be taught that nudity is not sexual, but normal, that their is nothing taboo about their bodies... and how to inject smack into dad's arm at his request.

 

Straw man arguments do not warrant reply.