Possibility of star formation around black holes

Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by Beaconator, Jan 27, 2014.

  1. brucep Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,098
    It's his knucklehead interpretation of the relativistic energy equation.

    In geometric units

    E^2 = m^2 + p^2

    In conventional units

    E^2_conv = (mc^2)^2 + p^2_conv c^2

    And no he can't add anything to the derivation as you already know. He could learn how the derivation is achieved but I'm thinking that's out of the question. When the momentum is 0 the invariant mass equals the invariant energy and this is what led to the Manhattan project. The mass is invariant by definition [some discussion required to formulate a proof] and the momentum and energy are constants of the motion. He could find the derivation in chapter 1, Speeding, of the text Exploring Black Holes.

    http://www.eftaylor.com/download.html#general_relativity

    Choose chapter 1 Speeding to download.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Dr_Toad It's green! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,527
    Someone else to ignore. Bruce, it works like a charm! Thanks.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. brucep Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,098
    It does if you don't start any threads. I think that was my second thread since I became a member.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    31,666
    Careful! That equation is dimensionally incorrect. You forgot to square the P.

    Not like that it can't. That equation would be dimensionally incorrect even if you corrected the error on the P.

    We don't even need to worry about what a hyperjerk is - though I think I have an idea.
     
  8. Beaconator Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    460
    an integrally costly mistake on my part.
    If you knew what it was you would have defined it. If it were acceleration^2 you would need an equation that was circular at best in its efforts to explain time. But this is the nature of time and history to be circular.
     
    Jason.Marshall likes this.
  9. Beaconator Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    460
    I can not rewrite history. Even in the most absent of minds. But I will contest in the most extreme values are the simplest design.
     
  10. Dr_Toad It's green! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,527

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     

Share This Page