On the new face of racism

Discussion in 'Human Science' started by S.A.M., Aug 9, 2007.

  1. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,822
    Explain what?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,822
    What people?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,822
    Pending a reasonable response, this is a summary of your contribution to sciforums


    Threads you started

    Baiting The Banning
    Some Aborigines 'Don't Understand Abuse'
    American's No Longer World's Tallest
    Would The World Be A Better Place
    Rich Black, Flunking
    Dog Fighting Culture
    Racial inequalities in American justice
    I'd Like Muslims More
    Poll: Do You Want To Be Homosexual?

    All these threads are issues of discrimination against people on the basis of color, sex or religion

    Your stated aims

    1. to warn people against the crimes committed by blacks
    2. to explain to people that a majority of blacks are least intelligent

    In other words, you offer no insights of your own nor any solutions, but merely wish to point out that blacks are stupid and violent.

    You have already had a 3 day temporary ban for reaching 20 infraction points in the context of your racist posts

    You have also had a 7 day temporary ban for reaching 18 points again and for continuing to troll in threads posting on issues which dominate racist viewpoints.

    ---------------------

    Sciforums is a free and open forum for discussion and our rules are lax as compared to most other forums of this nature; however free speech is not an excuse for promoting racism or sexism here. Please understand that while you are free to discuss any topic, as we just did, it must be in a manner that will promote understanding of both sides of the issue and will allow all sides to walk away from the discussion, having gained better insight into themselves and each other, and must be devoid of abusive racism . We hope you can enjoy this liberty, but this is entirely dependent on your ability to recognise and understand these limitations.

    I also encourage you to read other subforums here and gain a wider perspective on the diversity of people on this forum.

    If you have any questions, please feel free to PM any moderator for assistance.
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2007
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Count Sudoku Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,229
    You for starters.
     
  8. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,822
  9. Count Sudoku Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,229
    What a load of nonsense. I'll tackle two points that come up in this article.

    1. There are no races because the lines blur with some groups not being distinctly one or the other.

    That's like saying there is no color red or blue because some colors are a blend of blue and red.

    2. The race and IQ gap is based on fake data.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article2267671.ece

    The debate over racial differences in IQ represents perhaps the greatest scientific controversy of the past half-century. The facts are not in serious dispute: blacks score, on average, significantly lower than whites in IQ tests in the United States, Britain and beyond.

    Some argue that the only plausible response is to accept that blacks are naturally less intelligent than whites, a view that causes outrage among equal rights campaigners. But is there an alternative explanation for these puzzling statistics and what would it mean if there were not?
     
  10. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,822
    Looks like you did not read the whole article.
     
  11. USS Exeter unamerican american Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,482
    Both blacks and whites are human so they would have the exact same potentials.
     

Share This Page