Ah. Cheers. I didn't see the redirect. Overall, given the vague nature of the OP, I would have to agree with you that topically, it's more fitting here than elsewhere. But aside from simply being text stripped from another source, I can't see much value in the OP. If coberst had given some particular interpretation, or even suggested an interpretive line of questioning based on the material, I'd be quite happy. As it stands, it's simply an advertisement. The last thing needed in here are posts of the sort: " Kant thought X". .... crickets chirping........ .......... Even something akin to: "Kant thought X, and I think he was right because...." would be a vast improvement. I'll leave this be for now, hoping that either coberst will elucidate his position, or someone else will instigate some interesting discussion.