The "look" of the paper stems from the fact that I don't publish in journals, and I don't claim this to be a contender for such. To try mimicking the style of other papers in hopes of lending credibility to my model is cargo cultish and does not interest me. I try to support my model with reasoning and mathematics (e.g. look at the twin paradox section). I try to support the subjectivity in the paper with an appeal to aesthetics. You also presume that this is the only forum I've posted in, which it certainly is not. This is the forum which I expected the least amount of intellectual sincerity and maturity from but any substantive comments about the paper or the model, from any source, can usually be turned into something constructive.