Certainly. I am surprised we are all still alive. I beg to differ. Each can be as dangerous as the other and often are. Do you equate a religious belief that encourages shooting doctors or bombing abortion clinics to be less dangerous than Islam? How about the ones that preach not providing any medical aid, which has resulted in numerous children dying of wholly preventable issues and diseases? Or what about the ones who spit and threaten women for sitting in the front of the bus, as Israel has found in the last few years with its Orthodox members? You want to see people get angry and turn deadly, drop your pants and pee on the bible in full view of a far right Church. Or pee on a torah in front of an Orthodox Jew. After all, it's free speech, right? Freedom of expression and all that? I have stated and provided evidence of why I dislike this woman. Her bigotry, racism for a start. And where, exactly, have I said that the shooters were less culpable or that they are somehow justified in targeting that event? Correction. Charlie Hebdo applied satire to the politics of the time in France and elsewhere around the world. They did not target just one group or religion. Geller spends all of her time focused on only one group. Her convention was not about free speech as it was to offend as many as she could deliberately. Add to the lead up and her referring to Muslims as "savages" and the stage was set for a fun weekend of Muslim bashing. That is the difference between Geller and Hebdo. Geller and her cronies issue death threats to anyone who disagrees with her on social media. Is this acceptable opinion and expression of open Western societies? Is it only acceptable when she does it? My point is that she is a hypocrite when it comes to issues of free speech and freedom of expression. The fact of the matter is, I don't quite understand what her point was with that convention. Do you know what it was? Why did she hold that convention? For what purpose? Jihadists responded to her call and tried to shoot up the convention and now we get to talk about how evil and bad Muslims are. I guess she won her point after all. You do realise that was the whole point, right? As I said, Geller is as much of a fanatic as the Jihadist who want her dead. She wants them dead as much as they want her dead. We have already had one of her and Spencer's supporters kill dozens of children for the cause they keep spouting about and now we have Jihadist trying to retaliate against her personally. Where will it end? At some point, someone is going to have to figure out the distinction between freedom of speech and incitement to violence.