Nasa Faked Moon Landing

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by Present, Dec 10, 2005.

  1. leopold Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,455
    psst. the moon landings were faked. i know because i'm elvis.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Communist Hamster Cricetulus griseus leninus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,026
    I knew it!
    So The King, how is life treating you?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. URI IMU Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    729
    Just a note re: space craft preparation

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4555298.stm

    >> Giove-A has been designed and built by SSTL in under three years, a remarkably short timeframe for what is essentially an experimental spacecraft.

    "Three years ago I did a sketch of what I thought we could do," recalled John Paffett, projects director with SSTL.

    "To go from that sketch to what we have now is amazing. It is a very good demonstration of the company's capability - short timeframe, rapid programmes," he told the BBC News website.

    Giove's orbit will be novel, too - at least for Europe; it has never put a satellite 23,000km above the Earth.

    It is a particularly high radiation environment and the spacecraft will carry two instruments to assess conditions. >>>>

    just to alert you that putting an experimental moon-walk capsule into space.... and being able to retrieve the contents way back then...

    is a mammoth feat.... even now, when a lot more is known, and experience in space matters is high.

    There is just no way the USA walked on the Moon.... just no way.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Avatar smoking revolver Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,083
    There is just no way URI can be such a moron.... just no way.
    But then again... why not?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  8. leopold Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,455
    the following is a typical reason you can not believe everything that you read.


    Originally Posted by nirakar
    December 19, 2005 Feds Question ...dent lied. The FBI never visited him. next
     
  9. Ophiolite Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,232
    A student lied!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    It can't be true.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    You must be lying or delusional.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  10. RickyH Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,317
    An average days temperature on the moon ranges from 260F to 280F So how was an astronaut able to keep the film from being destroyed at these temps.
     
  11. RickyH Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,317
    I take this all back.... i did my own research on it found out they had special holdres keeping it from direct sun light sorry.... disregard this
     
  12. snake river rufus Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    855
    Also note that there is almost no atmosphere on the moon- nothing to conduct the 260F temp. to the cameras. Also that the 260F temp is the high of the moon's day, which is 28 earth days long. NASA planned the landings to occur during the lunar morning.
     
  13. RickyH Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,317
    actually no the 260 is the average temp.
     
  14. URI IMU Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    729
    >> there is almost no atmosphere on the moon- nothing to conduct the 260F temp.

    LOL

    matter conducts only too well and radiation would be from all angles.......

    But the spin doctors have covered these obvious aspects.....

    I think it has been admitted that the cameras/film were useless and fake earth footage was used....... ???
     
  15. snake river rufus Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    855
    Surface temp. not air temp.
     
  16. Avatar smoking revolver Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,083
    air temp?!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  17. snake river rufus Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    855
    Get this clear in your head- there is no matter if there is no atmosphere

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    The bulk of the radiation is not harmful in the doses encountered.
    And no, the radiation would not be from "all angles"

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Emitted from the sun, it travels in pretty much a straight line. the idea that space is awash with harmful radiation is hogwash.
     
  18. URI IMU Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    729
    >> it travels in pretty much a straight line

    Ever heard of diffraction, reflection and the wave nature of light ?
     
  19. Avatar smoking revolver Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,083
    Just let the moron believe what he wants.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    I doubt that the world will change just because uri would think slightly different.
     
  20. snake river rufus Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    855
    Yes I have. How are you implying that has any effect here?
     
  21. snake river rufus Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    855
    Well, I don't believe that I'll change his mind but perhaps others will realize that the kaysings,siebrels etc. are just frauds.
     
  22. URI IMU Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    729
    mean surface hot rock temp 133 C,
    dust in the 'thin air'... get real

    Obviously you live in air-con.
     
    Last edited: Jan 6, 2006
  23. snake river rufus Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    855
    Just what would kick up the dust? Wind?
    Are you claiming that this dust is affecting radiation?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     

Share This Page