Since Sculptor just can't get over this idea that everyone who opposes Russia in Syria is an ISIS agent, surely he must have an explanation for its existence that predates the 2003 US invasion of Iraq. If Israel was suspected of supporting ISIS at the time, why did neither G.W. Bush, Obama, nor anyone else of note on the entire planet mention that? All I ever heard at the time were complaints that America was doing Israel's bidding and therefore deserved the ISIS terror, where were the contrary voices claiming there's more to the picture? Maybe then one can claim that the US was indeed taking orders from Israel in Iraq. Why then would Israel send ISIS to attack US forces supposedly happily doing its bidding? Ok, let's pop some LSD and go even further down the rabbit hole. Maybe Israel sent ISIS to attack US forces so the US would feel compelled to stay in Iraq. Why then did not a single US soldier or officer of note complain that Israel is sending people to kill them in Iraq, why did none of the insurgent prisoners mention anything about Israeli support, and why was the US happy to finish ISIS off (or so it seemed at the time) by handing the country to a staunchly anti-American, pro-Iranian government? These dumbass layman conspiracy theories only make sense when you assume the perpetrators are both more brilliant than Napoleon, Wellington, Sun Tzu and every other great general or admiral in history, and simultaneously less perceptive than a typical elementary school pupil.