Maths to explain time.

Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by amber, Feb 1, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    I have not decided anything, you asked me a question and I gave my opinion as an answer. I do not have enough science knowledge to show any evident based conclusions. I leave science to science , but for a discussion you have to have an opinion.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,697
    No we don't.
    We say that the count slows because time has slowed.
    The count doesn't affect time, time affects the count.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,697
    So you have an opinion, but apparently it wasn't a decision, that the answer is "no"?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    My opinion of your no answer required another question which I have asked you . I have no conclusion , I only have questions and opinions. To conclude anything without thoroughly understanding the subject can only lead to vivid speculation.
     
  8. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    If it is said that time affects the count, then surely time must have physicality?
     
  9. nebel Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,202
    gravity in the basement is lower
    In an ideal isomass sphere, gravity declines linearly to zero in the center, density anomalies (like the nickel/ iron core) , showing variations in gravity, are great for finding treasures. Metal deposits are found near the surface that way.
    gravity in the basement is lower. gravity falls downward all the way. while you go down, moving through time goes up.
     
  10. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,444
    That would be handy I could weigh myself without glasses...a significant weight saving.

    Alex
     
  11. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,444
    A human would be observing the read out the scales cant measure anything they are inanimate.
    Alex
     
  12. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    True, but my scales have A.I lol. (joking)
     
  13. Michael 345 In China - finding my way :) Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,481
    Yes I can follow that

    My advice would be to double check before you post and I am going to assume that others out there are exactly like me in situations like this

    None of us are mind readers

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    amber likes this.
  14. Michael 345 In China - finding my way :) Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,481
    OK don't believe

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  15. Michael 345 In China - finding my way :) Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,481
    Get one that talks

    As long as when you step on them they don't say

    "One at a time please"

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  16. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    Looking at time dilation I have come up with this to look at the difference .

    Δt≠Δt'

    output≠output

    ΔS≠ΔS


    Based on a Caesium at relative rest , we can call this (A) on the left and a Caesium in relative motion , we can call this (B) on the right, makes an easier discussion.


    Is a change in output a change in entropy of the Caesium atom?

    If something is emitting slower than something else , then this must mean that this systems state is different to the others state?


    Does 9,192,631,770 Hz/3.26cm length contract when the Caesium atom is in relative motion to give a false impression of any change?

    What would happen if we removed the 3.26 cm between the Caesium and the detector so that the detector was virtually touching the Caesium?
     
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2018
  17. Michael 345 In China - finding my way :) Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,481
    I don't do maths / equations etc

    No idea about Caesium atom entropy and think would take to much time to research

    I'll sit this one out

    Just for interest this might help

    *****

    "The time unit of the International System of Units is the second defined as follows: “Thes second is the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to thet transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium 133 atom”

    AND

    In 2011, a British clock reached an accuracy of 2.3 10−16 s, which is an erroro of1 s/138 million years. It illustrates the considerable role of high technology ands state-of-the-art physics.

    Both from The Invention of Time and Space by Patrice F. Dassonville

    Well worth reading and studying

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    amber likes this.
  18. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    Does Δt=Δf represent the change of time is equal to the change of frequency?
     
  19. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,202
    It would, and it is also gibberish.

    The units of time are, let's say seconds (sec). The units of frequency are 1/sec. So what you have written means that seconds = 1/seconds. Equivalent to saying that 4 = 1/4. Stupid or what?

    Earlier on you were saying that change in energy = change of entropy = time interval. If change in energy = time interval, it means you are saying kilowatt-hours = hours. So this is also gibberish.

    As you have no grasp of mathematics (in spite of the years people have spent trying to teach you), do not write equations. It just makes you look an even bigger fool.
     
  20. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    Stating that time changes does not require units and stating that time changes equal to a frequency that changes also does not need units. It simply explains the actions , the units are irrelevant. So why do you say it is stupid?
     
  21. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    The full statement would track back in function

    Δt=Δf=ΔS=ΔE

    To go forward in function

    ΔE=ΔS=Δf=Δt

    Consider this a sort of maths that explains functions.

    2.
    MATHEMATICS
    a relation or expression involving one or more variables.
     
  22. Michael 345 In China - finding my way :) Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,481

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    This is why I don't do maths

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  23. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    The expression is self explanatory really,

    Δ=change
    t=time
    f=frequency
    S=entropy
    E=energy


    It basically says that each change is exactly equal to all the other changes, one action that creates all these changes.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page