Luminiferous Aether Exists!
- Thread starter Mazulu
- Start date
So, you can't explain why the 'dark matter' is being left behind when galaxy clusters collide.
'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html
"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""
The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.
There is nothing to 'leave behind'. Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.
Answer the deflection of the heliosphere, by application of F = qV x B, or just tuck your tail and hide behind meaningless drivel and trolling. Explain the history of science, why electromagnetics replaced aether theory, write and explain Newton's law of universal gravitation, write Coulomb's law and address the duality with Newton's law, and explain what kind of astronomical observations led to the conjecture that there might be dark matter, and the particular observations by NASA at the collision between two clusters.
All the rest is pure bunk.
Bunk in your face. I think I found a necessary pre-requisite for a big bang to exist.
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?123028-Big-bang&p=3020381#post3020381
The state of mainstream physics, understanding what occurs physically in nature to cause gravity, the observed behaviors in a double slit experiment and why 'dark matter' is left behind when galaxy clusters collide is meaningless drivel and trolling.
Displaced aether pushing back toward matter is gravity.
A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both.
Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.
All that just because you flunked out of science?
Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.
A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both.
Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.
Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.
Both are aether displacement waves.
Aether displaced by matter relates general relativity and quantum mechanics.
Like I just mentioned in another thread, the affect of spacetime curvature around a gravitational body is gravitational lensing. There is no visable bow wave around the planets and the Sun. They just focus light like a lense. A smooth lense. The photon has very little or no mass, so then it would have to be spacetime curvature that is causing the affect. A photon could not be drawn to a body because the photon had a large mass. That is the experiment that confers Einsteins notion of spacetime and gravity, gravitational lensing. There are no bow waves caused by this theory, and that is why it fits with observation. A bow wave would cause gravitational lensing that would be similair to not having a smooth lense.My guess is no. My guess is the Sun and the planets are in balance with the state of the displaced aether which surrounds them. I think the wave it outside of the overall sate of the displaced aether.
The following is an image of the state of displacement of the aether surrounding the Milky Way. It is in the shape of a squished beach ball. I think it likely there is a bow wave outside of this region.
'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1004/1004.1475v1.pdf
"Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely."
The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether. The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through and displace the aether.
Very clearly false. Gravity is directly proportional to mass and indirectly proportional to the square of the distance between the masses. Therefore, even if there were an aether (which there isn't) it would have absolutely no influence upon gravity whatsoever, which is exactly what's observed.
You can invent all the false beliefs you want, but you can't repeal the laws of nature, especially by proclamation. Gravity will continue to exert itself strictly as a function of mass and distance, and nothing more.
So just hit paste-paste-paste-paste-paste-paste-paste-paste-paste-paste-paste-paste-paste-paste-paste-paste-paste...
Even ritualizing your beliefs will not cause them to magically come true. All you're doing is filling up some distant server disk with useless data that no one will ever bother to retrieve again.
Aether is displaced by matter. The more particles of matter which exist the greater the displacement of the aether. The greater the displacement of the aether the greater the force of the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the matter.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect#Vacuum_energy
"a "field" in physics may be envisioned as if space were filled with interconnected vibrating balls and springs, and the strength of the field can be visualized as the displacement of a ball from its rest position"
A 'field' in physics is space filled with aether and the strength of the field is the displacement of the aether from its rest position.
Each of the plates in the Casimir effect displace the aether. The displaced aether which exists between the plates is pushing back toward each of the plates which causes the aether displaced by each of the plates which exists between the plates to offset. This aether is more at rest than the aether which is displaced by the plates which encompasses the plates. The reduced force associated with the aether which exists between the plates along with the displaced aether which encompasses the plates which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the plates causes the plates to be forced together.
What occurs physically in nature in the Casimir effect is the same phenomenon as gravity.
There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter.
Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.
There is not one whit of science in anything you have posted. In the 10 or 20 pages you droned on in this thread, you have not posted even a single formula to establish any of the spurious nonsense you've invented. I gave you one simple precept from electromagnetics that relates the interaction between particles and fields, insofar as the "push" or "displacement" you keep yammering about. (The correct term is "force", not "push"): F = qV x B. You have not given even one formula that has anything to do with aether. You can cling to your blanky and throw a tantrum all you want, but Lorentz's law--and Maxwell's equations in general--will continue to explain the actual behavior of the world day in and day out, and remains immune to your proclamations, which is merely the nature of nature. It doesn't bow to your whims. You simply have no control over the universe, monsieur Bonaparte of the Heliosphere.
No matter what you say, there will always be a force that relates charge, the magnetic field, and the cutting of space across the field by that charge. Obviously this has nothing to do with any spurious "pressure" you've invented. It's fields and charges, bub. It's particles in motion. It's fields propagating. Grow up and get over it. If any of the crap you're posting were remotely true you would have a mathematical basis for it. But then you never were any good in math, were you? Therein lies the rub. It's an essential tool of science.
If you ever emerge from your intellectual childhood, you will pick up a book and learn electromagnetics. If any of your bankrupt ideas were even remotely true, you could easily prove them using the same principles in any standard text. At least that would amount to a promotion to pseudoscience. At present you're just whining and thrashing. Throwing fits just leaves you in your knowledge vacuum. Get out of the sandbox and get an education, dude. Man up, post your math, or admit that you have none because you're just trolling folks who long ago put away their toys and put on big boys' britches. Waaa.
'An Extended Dynamical Equation of Motion, Phase Dependency and Inertial Backreaction'
http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3458
"We hypothesize that space itself resists such surges according to a kind of induction law (related to inertia); additionally, we provide further evidence of the “fluidic” nature of space itself."
The aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid, a supersolid, which is described in the article as the 'fluidic' nature of space itself. The 'back-reaction' described in the article is the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the matter.
The following article describes the aether as an incompressible fluid resulting in what the article refers to as gravitational aether caused by pressure (or vorticity).
'Phenomenology of Gravitational Aether as a solution to the Old Cosmological Constant Problem'
http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.3955
"One proposal to address this puzzle at the semi-classical level is to decouple quantum vacuum from space-time geometry via a modification of gravity that includes an incompressible fluid, known as Gravitational Aether. In this paper, we discuss classical predictions of this theory along with its compatibility with cosmological and experimental tests of gravity. We argue that deviations from General Relativity (GR) in this theory are sourced by pressure or vorticity."
The following article describes gravity as a pressure exerted by aether toward matter.
'The aether-modified gravity and the G ̈del metric'
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1109.5654v2
"As for the pressure, it is equal to p = 53−αg,6a2 so, it is positive if αg < 3 which is the weaker condition than the previous one. One notes that the results corresponding to the usual gravity are easily recovered. Also, it is easy to see that the interval αg < 15 corresponds to the usual matter."
The following article describes a gravitating vacuum where aether is the quantum vacuum of the 21-st century.
'From Analogue Models to Gravitating Vacuum'
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.1155
"The aether of the 21-st century is the quantum vacuum, which is a new form of matter. This is the real substance"
The following articles describe what is presently postulated as dark matter is aether.
'Quantum aether and an invariant Planck scale'
http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3753
"this version of aether may have some bearing on the abundance of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in our universe."
"mass of the aether"
'Scalars, Vectors and Tensors from Metric-Affine Gravity'
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.5168
"the model obtained here gets closer to the aether theory of , which is shown therein to be an alternative to the cold dark matter."
'Unified model for dark matter and quintessence'
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0610135
"Superfluid dark matter is reminiscent of the aether and modeling the universe using superfluid aether is compatible."
'Vainshtein mechanism in Gauss-Bonnet gravity and Galileon aether'
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1107.1892
"the perturbations of the scalar field do not propagate in the Minkowski space-time but rather in some form of ”aether” because of the presence of the background field"
So, you can't explain why the 'dark matter' is being left behind when galaxy clusters collide.
'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html
"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""
The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.
There is nothing to 'leave behind'. Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.
‘Dark Core’ May Not Be So Dark After All
"Now, a new observation of Abell 520 from another team of astronomers using a different Hubble camera finds that the core does not appear to be over-dense in dark matter after all."
A galaxy cluster collision is like two ships that pass by each other. The bow wave sloshes back and forth. This is what is occurring with Abell 520. We'll have to keep an eye on the 'dark core'. If I am correct it should appear once again as the aether 'sloshes' back.
"Now, a new observation of Abell 520 from another team of astronomers using a different Hubble camera finds that the core does not appear to be over-dense in dark matter after all."
A galaxy cluster collision is like two ships that pass by each other. The bow wave sloshes back and forth. This is what is occurring with Abell 520. We'll have to keep an eye on the 'dark core'. If I am correct it should appear once again as the aether 'sloshes' back.
So you can't explain why a particle bends a magnetic field.
Mainstream physics, pure ignorance. Yeah, you probably think particles are a mystery. There is no mystery. If you stop blindly following the dogma, you will clearly see that particles are not round at all, and they can be easily distinguished by their color and the symbols on them:
Morons! It obvious aether is pressuring the universe:
As clearly seen, a gluon is a very small spring made of aether pressure. Anyone who is not a slave to their dogma can clearly see that aether has also been photographed (in yellow below):
It pushes particles together. If particles were seeds, aether would be the flesh of a canteloupe, except in the state of a superfluid, kind of squishy, kind of sloshy, pushing, pushing, displacing, and pushing more and more as the seeds try to break free and plant themselves in the soil of the cosmos.
I know this because I inhaled the smoke of my textbooks as I burned them in retribution for the mainstream robot teachers who told me I would have to learn mainstream math in order to pass mainstream Introduction to Physics 101.
The smoke displaced the air and that was when I understood that aether not only has mass, but it has pressure because mass keeps displacing it, which is not the ground state of aether, so aether pushes back and puts the particles under tension. This is exactly like two balls connected by springs, which is obviously proven by the well-known Spring Equation, which is clearly the spring tensioned pushing sloshy dislacement force that ignorant mainstream robots ignore, blindly following Newton, simply because he claimed it as his own twisted version, known as mainstream gravity, setting back physics by 300 years. Clearly the Spring Equation accounts for the pressure displacement pushing slosh of particles that is the cause of gravity:
F = kx.
Look it up. Then, after you've eaten crow for adhering to clearly blind and obviously erroneous conclusions about the universe, you will come crawling back to me and begging to touch my robes, because I am the Lord of the Heliosphere, and you are merely slaves of robots who couldn't even see the obvious truth, if you were sitting there, slurping on a sloshy canteloupe, over that same holy ground where the ashes of ignorant textbook editors lay in the dirt, obviously pushed down, displaced down, downward to the center of the earth, by the yellow squishy slosh, that superfuid supersolid superslosh yellow orangey squishy pushy spring loaded pressurized displacer that is clearly, obviously, as only ignorant robots dogmatically deny: aether.
~QVOD ERAT DEMONSTRANDUM~
MDCCLXXXIX
Aether has mass. Matter displaces it.
Last edited:
Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter.
Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.
A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both.
There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.
Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.
Both are aether displacement waves.
Aether displaced by matter relates general relativity and quantum mechanics.
Thanks for the exclamation point....
'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."
The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy clusters. The ripple is an aether displacement wave. The ripple is a gravitational wave. This is also evidence of a moving 'particle', the galaxy clusters, having an associated aether wave.