DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Faulty analogy.No, another bucket of water in the ocean is not a significant increase.
You're counting oceans. In a lottery, you're counting the buckets.
Faulty analogy.No, another bucket of water in the ocean is not a significant increase.
It's the same thing. The increase is too tiny to be significant.Faulty analogy.
You're counting oceans. In a lottery, you're counting the buckets.
Well, for one, I'm too old to get to the casinos (we have 3-4 here in St. Loser). AND I know players bleed to death slowly there. But buy a lottery ticket when I stop for gas, that's no big deal.See, I figure the other way around makes more sense.
It's not as if "only" winning 2 million - as opposed to 100 - is anticlimactic. Any large amount is going to change your life.
So, given a choice between
- "a stupid amount of money with a miniscule chance of winning", and
- "a stupid amount of money with a larger chance of winning"
why not go for the larger chance?
But it doesn't result in a significant chance of winning the jackpot.Sure it does. Doubling the number of tickets doubles your chances. That's a significant increase.