I just thought I might post one of my thoughts from my blog here and see what you all think. Cheers Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! ---- After many years of looking at all the systems and the new educational subjects that we have created including mathematics as well. I realized that something just wasn’t “adding up”pun intended Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!. Something was still missing. Science; a field where trial an error with Numerical Mathematical results currently rules todays society but still something is missing there as well. It is true, Numerical Mathematics is a key stone but have you asked how you created these mathematical equations ? For humans to innovate on the future,they rely on logic to help them at least to have a good guess of what the formula will hold and what type of outcome they should expect. And yet know one has acknowledged this. So let me be the first one to introduce to you Logical Mathematics. A base fundamental subject where everything is built over it. Including your Numerical Mathematics. Each subject has a varying degree of both. Some are heavier Numeric subjects while other are heavier in logical ones or an intensive use of both. Quantum Physics seems to be utilizing heavily both. Hence the creation of it, as all other new heavily dependent numerical mathematical subjects fell short of getting the results needed, cause lets face it, numerical math by it self is very limiting when you want to innovate . But still to this date there is no true fundamental understanding of what has been created. Clearly society is aware that numerical maths cannot solve everything and needed a different approach to its Numeric heavy dependency of solving problems that cannot be solved with numbers. Logical mathematics is the starting point for all subjects including Numerical Mathematics itself. Someone has to think logically of what it might be that they are trying to reach and then implement it Numerically. I would assume that world known mathematicians that have created new formulas and found new theories are strong in both numeric and logical mathematics [Let me categorize these masters as Alpha Numeric Masters/ANM] but lack the pure power of Numeric mastery. Of course the Numeric masters are able to process and combine much further and faster numeric combinations than the ANM’s.[ Let me categorize them as Beta Numeric Masters/BNM] But are unable to enhance the core fundamentals of Numeric Maths itself. I believe that mathematical breakthroughs do happen with ANM individuals but in our current evolution rate and place we are at, the logic required to make a breakthrough has proportional increasing and requires BNM support alongside ANM individuals. Again I don’t know as I have not had the time to check it for myself but there might be some mathematical breakthroughs done by more than 1 person and if so it is a mix of various ANM and BNM individuals. This applies to specialists in all fields and breakthroughs. If anybody has the time feel free to look to confirm. Of course there is an exception to this rule as each field is vast,it leaves many simpler logical factors still open to discovery as it is still possible that even in the older fields a discovery can be still made by a single individual.[e.g1,2,3,4,5….] But this outcome is decreased as these fields becomes more specialized and polished/ worked on. In the beginning, when we created education and Tesla and Einstein was born, all these revolutionary men, individuals[single persons] where more than enough to make such breakthroughs as the logical complexity was still simple. But as we evolved I believe more and more breakthroughs will be done by 2 people if not teams which are a combinations of both numeric and logical thinkers within their fields. This further supports my theory that all fields of education and thought processes by humankind is Logical Mathematics as a base form of thought. Over that, many factors can influence the final decision or end results of such a process. It can be influence by Numerical Mathematics or by human emotions which yields very “interesting” results Not all logic thought is taught the same, and as people learn from childhood, many people learn various forms of it I think I have a way of testing individuals for finding out the levels of numerical and logical levels of thought that they posses. And since I have been writing this I have been also seeing a new pattern emerge and I believe that there are also more types[subcategories] of numeric and logical thinkers. If we can properly identify them in each person and blend together among themselves with the proper combination the results will be astounding. And we won’t have to wait 20 years for them to figure out how to make a “scrollable based tv”.
And yet you fail to do so... Just a lot of (apparently) inane waffle with no substance and numerous unsubstantiated claims.
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! well at least you took the time to read it. Thanks for feedback. Cheers.
So does that mean you are not going to demonstrate the power of Logical Mathematics? You are not going to say what it is, you are only going to say it is great? That does not seem very useful...
The huge intellectual jump from the "Numerical Mathematical results" at the start of the post to the link to scrollable based TV sets at end of the post is too big jump for my limited logic abilities to be able to digest it Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
never thought of it that way actually. Surely I can put something together once time permits. Could you throw at me a couple of examples as to hypotheticals comparison's questions of what you are looking for, to be able to put something together that is "understandable" as an example.
No I can't give you any examples, because I don't know what you are talking about. You say that you have this new idea called Logical Mathematics, so give use an example of your mathematics.
Ahem. Mathematics is already logical. "Logical Mathematics" doesn't suggest anything we don't know about logic or mathematics. What DMorkos does seem to be talking about in the OP is mathematics and education, sort of. But "mathematics is numerical" appears to be a misconception.
See http://metamath.org/ for development of many fields of mathematics from statements about the logic of sets.
