light propagates at c + v?

Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by BdS, Nov 21, 2015.

  1. BdS Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    422
    As I know the experiments are correct and your evaluation of them failed Mr Einstein, sorry.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,703
    Of course!!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    You have a good day now ya hear?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,703
    Of course I comprehend it.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    It's you with the problem. You cannot remove yourself from that old school of time and space being absolute [which has been shown they are not] and the counter-intuitive [on face value] of the speed of light being absolute: You rant and rave on without taking into account the facts of time dilation and length contraction, which explains why what you see as counter-intuitive is not. In other words you dismiss SR.That alone explains much.
    Yeah sure my friend.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    If you chose to live in your little cocoon governed by your mythical beliefs that is your problem.
    I certainly will keep reporting science as I see it, and as it changes and advances that will certainly occur. Of course that will not happen on forums such as this, with every Tom, Dick and Harry that suffers from delusions of grandeur using this vehicle [the only vehicle they have] to push their nonsense on to the world [well not quite the world as you no doubt seem to imagine

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    ] but a small sliver of cyber space on a remote science forum.
    Not getting you very far is it?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. BdS Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    422


    Ok, lets see if you or anyone else comprehends what Im saying. From the video explain what Im saying.

    You just want to keep attacking my character, because you cant argue the science.
     
  8. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,703
    The OP:

    The post in "Gravitational Curve/field reconfiguration" in the pseudoscience thread.
    http://www.sciforums.com/threads/gravitational-curve-field-reconfiguration.153013/
    At post 9:

    I believe you in your enthusiasm for your mission, do not really understand what you are saying.
    The illustrations of how you once again invoked some nonsense already put in pseudoscience shows that.
    What is anyone to learn from your video?
    It's all science.
     
  9. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,703

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    I don't need to attack your character....Your character is defined already. I'm only taking a passing interest.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    and noting observations.
     
  10. BdS Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    422
    So is yours a coward and a waist of time... Bye I dont talk to or read what tarded spambots have to say.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2016
  11. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,450
    I think that everyone understands what you are saying, they just disagree with what you are saying.
     
  12. BdS Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    422
    The problem is before he even starts to explain he already assumes the local observer and remote observer see different things. How is that possible? i know nature is weird, but not that weird...
    The local observer is in motion and you say he sees the light go straight up in a straight line | the distance of c only moving at c, that is obviously not whats happening. He is in motion and what the local observer sees is exactly the same as the remote observer sees the / c + v, he just doesn't notice the v. Because the local observer is moving at v he sees it going in a straight line | only at c, but the light followed the / c + v path through space. Too hard to understand? whats the problem? 100 years of this?

    The real way to see this is obviously to plot the motion on a stationary coordinate system and show both the remote and local observer and they'll both agree they see the same thing this /.
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2016
  13. BdS Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    422
    And they'll both agree it took the exact same time for the clock to complete 1 cycle. The light followed the exact same path for both observers.
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2016
  14. BdS Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    422
    Special relativity must be for the "special" people, because I dont understand it at all.
     
  15. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,450
    That is incorrect. The speed of light is a constant for all observers. This has been shown by the experiments that show all measurements of light in a vacuum is constant.
     
  16. BdS Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    422
    one of those "special" people I mentioned and another candidate for the ignore forum function... His words really prove his opinion as always.
    It constantly moves at c + v.
     
  17. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,450
    No they won't.
     
  18. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,450
    You can do that mathematics for special relativity by using highschool algebra. It is particularly easy if you only look at the direction of travel instead of looking at all 3D directions. If you like I could direct you to some excellent lectures that go over how this works. Like I said highschool algebra will suffice to understand understand the concept.
     
  19. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,450
    I am not giving my opinion, I am giving you what experimentation and the mathematics show. If you prefer to just ignoring ideas you do not understand instead of learning to understand those ideas, that is your choice.
     
  20. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,212
    Relativity is one of the most exhaustively-tested theories in all science. It has passed with flying colours every time, to as many decimal places as we care to check, never once deviating from expectations.

    The fact that its not easy to understand, because it usually manifests beyond typical human perception (extremely high speeds and energies), does not change that.
     
    paddoboy likes this.
  21. BdS Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    422
    And what am I giving? theres the experiments and the maths... wow. Can you tell whats wrong with them? thought not.
    Carpenter maths and elementary school logic is all thats needed to understand mine.

    Prove why the local observer and remote observer see different things and I will believe you, but you going to need solid logical physical evidence.

    Relativity is easy to understand, I just dont agree with it. Your Italic cryptic lingo isn't helping you either. What you going to do now?
    Have you achieved extremely high speeds recorded the data and proved your assumptions? Till then all relativity has is pseudoscience, yes? just like curved spacetime and the rest of it all pseudoscience, yes? Mods better move all the posts in the science section to the fringe sections. Mainstream deals with "special" fringe science... lol omg!
    Im showing you at low speeds the claimed effects are non-existent, why should they manifest at high speeds if no trace of them exists at low speeds?

    if you want to achieve extremely high speeds ask me how and if I feel motivated I might just tell you

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2016
  22. BdS Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    422
    Lets conduct a experiment, we put paddoboy, origin and Dave on a shuttle with no windows to the Orion *** constellation at a velocity of 30km/h and we just wait.
     
  23. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,703
    Get a bigger shuttle, you'll need virtually the whole world as no one else agrees with you .
    That really says it all.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     

Share This Page