No. Science is a method of discovering knowledge, based on experimentation. It has no rituals, no specific creed or belief system. There's a loose community, but science doesn't contextualize ideas and experiences through ritual the way that religion does. They're not comparable at all, even using the broadest definition of religion.
Personally, I'd say that religious-like attitudes can be found in the sciences. It should come as no surprise to anyone that science has its more liberal open-minded thinkers as well as the fiercely conservative types whose resistence to, and suppression of, alternatives to their own cherished worldview might aptly be described as dogmatic -- the kind of thing we tend to associate with certain religions.
One example that leaps to mind immediately is the so-called Copenhagen school (Bohr, Heisenberg, Pauli, etc.) of quantum mechanics.
Things seems to have loosened up a little these days, as far as I can discern, though it was only a few decades ago that any attempt to challenge Copenhagen orthodoxy was met with ridicule, censorship (i.e. refusal to publish) and perhaps even the end of a budding career.
When first hearing of David Bohm's "pilot wave" alternative to the reigning Copenhagen hegemony, for example, John Bell exclaimed (and I paraphrase) "How come no one ever told me about this?!!"
Speaking of John Bell, the first person to experimentally test the famous "Bell's theorem" was American physicist John Clauser . . .
"Clauser recalled that during his student days "
open inquiry into the wonders and peculiarities of quantum mechanics" that went beyond the Copenhagen interpretation was "
virtually prohibited by the existence of various religious stigmas and social pressures, that taken together, amounted to an evangelical crusade against such thinking."
(quoted from "Quantum: Einstein, Bohr, and the great debate about the nature of reality", Manjit Kumar, p356)
