I look forward to that realization ending your posting of the Party name "National Socialist" on this forum. Meanwhile, we have the common term "nazi", a leftover, as part of the OP. Bullshit. It's not easy, and most people who try it will either miss or break their hand. The only way to do it consistently would be to 1) practice a lot, and 2) sucker-punch (so their head moves) with some kind of brace - a roll of coins, say - for the fist. That's not a similarity. The racial identifications involved are radically different: Just for starters: the one is imposed from the outside, involuntary; the other is adopted, voluntary. That has fundamental moral and ethical consequences. Isn't the difference between voluntary and coerced status kind of your big focus? How'd you miss that one? Or see northern Wisconsin in the 1930s, northwestern Mexico after NAFTA, Honduras and Colombia in the wake of the capitalist takeover, the slums of Brazil as we speak - capitalism has destroyed families and local communities wherever it has escaped governance, often beginning with the removal of the men from the daily life of the children, and the introduction of mercenary violence. Fortunately, when the advent of an incoming round of predatory or bullying capitalism is announced by its "nazi" advocates, it becomes visibly odious (political synesthesia). And if the purveyors of violence and odium make themselves obnoxious enough, in the right circumstances, they can be punched without qualm or violation of civilized norms. Or slapped, for that matter - injury is hardly the point. The question here, from the OP, is what those circumstances would be.