i am pro activating discoarse in science all about encouraging involvement thread killer like comments that may be construed as emotively concocted are troll like. maybe daves comments have no ulterior motive. i place accountability on the more evolved to help pave a road that allows greater learning. that is a core ideological morality around power & authority. when a scientist goes against that it is usually because they are religiously indoctrinated to spread false science. i expected something a little more attuned from dave. thats all. i blocked him because of his manner for some time, but decided to unblock him as i find value in his opinion. he has be blocked i believe. i will use his knowledge as he wishes to be used i am keenly and starkly aware that arrogance and authority are a death sentence to civility... as with current swings to the alt-right in global leadership issues. science will be hit hard the father the move to the right. its just a waiting game for the science budgets to be cut. that in turn undermines education of children, which helps create more extremist radicals. butterfly effect ... we all have the capability of the possibility of being a butterfly i dont dislike dave, even if he is rude to me, ive met plenty of grumpy emotionally dysfunctional highly trained engineer type people over the years. p.s i am also aware trolls will be reading this and some worse than trolls(possibly who knows for sure, better safe than sorry) as is the way of things so my comments are measured slightly. wegs is a layperson from my understanding with heavy emotive tone to intimate meaning, (compared to stereo typical dry-toast old world sciency male drudgery language forced sterility). i would expect a sharp mind to acclimatize to that in turn. preferably not for nefarious purposes(as is the common expected negative outcome option).