# Imitation = Compliment, Plagiarism Something Else

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by Kaiduorkhon, Jul 25, 2007.

Not open for further replies.
1. ### KaiduorkhonRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
552
Caveat
Before late '99, as can be confirmed by GOOGLE and other chronological archives, there were no (zero) discussions on 'gravity is the 4th dimension', or gravity, electricity & magnetism as the 4th, 5th & 6th dimensions. Or The Reinstatement of Einstein's Unified Field w'out Math: The Big Bang Theory is Wrong.

All that has changed, since.
In late '99 (under a bevy of witnesses, including his co workers at the time <in Santa Cruz, CA>), one Brian Kirk Parquette (bkparque) enthusiastically introduced himself to me and several of my friends and acquaintances; asked to buy a copy of the (condensed) 54 page, 5th edition of my (627 page) hard copy published - consistently sold out - book, GRAVITY IS THE 4th DIMENSION (Electricity the 5th, Magnetism the 6th).

After reading and praising it abundantly, Parquette asked me if it was posted on the net. I said I didn't know how to use the internet and used computers only for word processing and printing out copy material from which I produced and distributed small press editions of my book. Having done so with a typewriter and off set press since 1970, and before then, published and sold out repeatedly in small press essay and soft cover book form, since 1959 (beginning in Naples, Italy and translated into three lanuages, all along the French and Italian Rivieras, prolifically responded to with positive accolades, in Italian, French and English).

Parquette asked me if it was okay for him to post it on the internet. Of course I was grateful for this opportunity and was happy to give him a disc containing several of my works, including the issued (condensed) physics book.

Until the Astronomy Net was temporarily retired on 6 December 02, for renovation, when you clicked on google and entered 'gravity is the 4th dimension', you went to the Astronomy Net and accessed a post by 'bkparque', who initiated that particular Astronomy Net post and referenced a series of URL 404's where he had posted info previously and then deleted it without further explanation. It was later revealed that he had presentend the work as his own and then retracted it.

Parquette presently maintains a forum of his own.

Since then, one bkparque is sprinkled all over the web/net with 'posts by bkparque', espousing gravity as the 4th dimension. This goes back to Dec., '99 and February 2000 (and ever since...). Bkparque at first avoided telling his readers that such posts were authored by himself, deliberately leaving the reader with the directly implied impression that bkparque is the author of what he posts. In a an internet letter addressed, and rudely worded to Princeton's Dr. Wheeler, and Dr. Eliot McGucken (of Jolly Roger), Parquette eventually and overtly proclaims himself to be the 'Author' of several extended, verbatim excerpts from my book (Enter 'Dr. Eliot McGucken ‘Do let me know when it stops' 'Brian Kirk Parquette', in GOOGLE - argumentively engaged . McGucken and Dr. Wheeler, while impersonating myself...)

bkparque was reprimanded and corrected for copyright infringement (including bold and elaborate plagiarism), by Delphiforums.com for multiple copyright intrusions and misrepresentations on a variety of subjects, including claiming the title *'gravity is the 4th dimension' to be authored by himself (*included in his 'forum profile' as his 'personal quote'), along with the title of his forum - EXTRATERRESTRIAL PHYSICS 101 (Copyright 1979 by Kent Benjamin Robertson, AKA Kent Robertson ben Abraham, That Rascal Puff, KaiduOrkhon).

Reliable sources say that bkparque's brigand posts in the Astronomy Net Forums are one of the reasons that site was renovated

The title, 'Gravity Is The 4th Dimension' is copyrighted and published in 10 small press editions (thru 2007) since 1959, by Kent Benjamin Robertson - book was sold internationally through the 1970-71 WHOLE EARTH CATALOGUE (Published by the Portola Institute), and which goes back to earlier titles, including 'The New Gravity', and 'An Hypothesis On Gravity'.

The work has since emerged under a flurry of authorships, some of whom are informed piecemeal and innocent of plagiarism, and some of whom - like bkparque - are lifting extended exerpts, rhyme, chapter and verse, directly out of K.B. Robertson's original work, the condensed 6th edition of which is free for any and all to read at * http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie; these pirates are now gridlocked with a fitting argument, contending who purloined the work first. The lastest contender to join the fray (in 2002, advertising ‘his book' on the net) is one Mark McCutcheon, the first two chapters of whose book - The Final Theory - conspicuously parallels the work at issue here, authored by Truly Yours.
The first two electrifying chapters of McCutcheon's oxymoronically titled book are direct parallels of and, ostensibly extracted from Gravity Is The 4th Dimension, by Truly Yours. I am grateful for whatever attention Mr. McCutcheon may gather for himself, insofar as when he lays enough eggs on the other side of the road, the chickens will inevitably come home to roost. As I have said before on this issue, whether Mr. McCutcheon pirated my work or not is a technicality. The point is that his so called 'Final Theory' party is nearly 50 years tardy. I am grateful to Mr. Mark McCutcheon for publishing his work in hard copy and advertising it on the internet, although I must admit resenting his greed in selling my work at $30.00 per copy while mine is given away free. Should McCutcheon ever be obliged to pay royalties, I hereby publicly promise to give whatever that may amount to, to worthy charity. More will be said about this culminating intrigue and duplicity, later. (Any suggestions are welcome.) In 1967, Dr. Richard Feynman, Prof Emeritus of Cal Tech (Nobel Prize Laureate), skipped three classes he taught at that time to talk with K.B. Robertson (AKA Kent Robertson ben Abraham), one on one in his (Feynman's) study, about the unprecedented statement 'gravity is the 4th dimension', after which time Dr. R. Feynman candidly conceded, 'I am unable to disqualify it'. Witnesses to this include Dr. Feynman's staff of that era, as well as Peter and Donna Tyner, and Vern and Miriam Reed, of Los Angeles. 10,000 small press distributed copies are sold out in 41 California bookstores in the past 30 years. It outsold 'JAWS' at the UC Berkeley Campus bookstore in the mid '70s, and was a best seller at CODY'S and MOE'S bookstores on Telegraph Ave. It (‘Gravity Is The 4th Dimension') has been graffiti on the walls of international cities - as well as the Birge - Physics - Building on Berkeley Campus, for decades. A number of people certainly including myself have learned of and certainly taken interest in a series of emergences of this statement - Gravity is the 4th dimension ( Electricity is the 5th Dimension, Magnetism is the 6th Dimension, Extraterrestrial Physics 101, The New Gravity, Total Field Theory, The Reinstatement of Einstein's Presently Abandoned Unified Field Theory, The Big Bang Theory is Wrong) - under as many different 'original authorships' - in the past several decades. For an evolved discussion on the featured topic at hand in this forum the reader is respectfully advised to refer to the source at the above provided URL. It may be interesting to see the evolution of this thread as it is contributed to by readers of the referred URL, as compared to the persons who (ostensibly) haven't read it. Post Script: Gravity is the 4th Dimension (Gravity, Electricity & Magnetism are the 4th, 5th and 6th dimensions; the Big Bang Theory is Wrong; the Reinstatement of Einstein's Presently Abandoned Unified Field Theory) is a narrative and an anthological compendium of quotes from other books, researched, gathered and editorially connected to one another (by way of employing and connecting previously unrecognized works) in the unprecedented commission of what amounts to a historically substantiated - overwhelmingly documented - reinstatement of Einstein's presently abandoned *Unified Field Theory. *The objective of which is to find electromagnetism and gravity as being two apparently different phenomena, actually having the same causal identity .Of course I will gladly shake the hand of anyone who can precede my 1959 copyright. The achievement of reinstating Einstein's formerly abandoned Unified Field Theory includes a seriatim of major break throughs in theoretical physics. When Parquette's impersonation and displacement of myself as the author of the subjected work was brought to my attention, I forthwith expressed my disappointment in him, at the same time that I assured him that all he - or anyone emulating him - would succeed in doing is making a fool of himself and expediting the conveyence of my formerly hard copy, small press confined work to the world. Best regards, - RascalPuff, Kaiduorkhon (K B. Robertson) 2. ### GuestGuest Advertisement to hide all adverts. 3. ### KaiduorkhonRegistered Senior Member Messages: 552 Imitation=compliment. Plagiarism=something else. To whom it may concern: On 6 August at 5:17PM I received the following message from Brian Kirk Parquette (bkparque), transferred to me as it is posted in the 'Physics' website, in response to "Imitation = compliment; plagiarism another". ____________________ 2 of 2 Posted Aug-6 5:17 PM Msg 2645.2 reply to 2645.1 From bkparque (bkparque2) Brian Kirk Parquette To: RascalPuff get a life you freak, nobody cares, keeping talking that stupid crap and making an ass of yourself... youve been doing it for 40 years, and your still aloser rehashing other peoples work and calling it your own, while trying to convince anyone thatll listen that i plagiarized your drama queen bs. I thought it was good back then, now ive learned its you trying to get attention and its other peoples work rewritten. Yeah i published your crap, its a matter of internet record, and i was stupid enough to advertise it. Well thats all over now. Now your going to have to do your own work. and yes everyone knows your computer illiterate while you try to convince them that you understand science which you do not. youve published that last page back there hundreds of times, and convinced everyone that you weird. YOU RUN THE INTERNET TALKING ABOUT MY LIFE WHICH IS NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS. I have been quiet for a long about you, I know a lot of mental cases doing the same thing. have fun! ______________________ Readers familiar with my anthological and unprecedented narrative work, and the internet archived fact that Mr. Parquette (bkparque) repeatedly proclaimed authorship of it (while impersonating me and obnoxiously arguing with world class physics authorities): Readers may draw their own conclusions regarding the selectively worded content and import of Mr. Parquette's self-revealing transmission. Best regards, - RP 4. ### GuestGuest Advertisement to hide all adverts. 5. ### KaiduorkhonRegistered Senior Member Messages: 552 Imitation=compliment. Plagiarism=something else. Quote: Originally Posted by RascalPuff To whom it may concern: On 6 August at 5:17PM I received the following message from Brian Kirk Parquette (bkparque), transferred to me as it is posted in the 'Physics' website, in response to "Imitation = compliment; plagiarism another". ____________________ Posted Aug-6 5:17 PM Msg 2645.2 reply to 2645.1 From bkparque (bkparque2) Brian Kirk Parquette To: RascalPuff (Kaiduorkhon, AKA, Kent Benjamin Robertson) get a life you freak, nobody cares, keeping talking that stupid crap and making an ass of yourself... youve been doing it for 40 years, and your still aloser rehashing other peoples work and calling it your own, while trying to convince anyone thatll listen that i plagiarized your drama queen bs. I thought it was good back then, now ive learned its you trying to get attention and its other peoples work rewritten. Yeah i published your crap, its a matter of internet record, and i was stupid enough to advertise it. Well thats all over now. Now your going to have to do your own work. and yes everyone knows your computer illiterate while you try to convince them that you understand science which you do not. youve published that last page back there hundreds of times, and convinced everyone that you weird. YOU RUN THE INTERNET TALKING ABOUT MY LIFE WHICH IS NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS. I have been quiet for a long about you, I know a lot of mental cases doing the same thing. have fun! ______________________ Readers familiar with my anthological and narrative work, and the internet archived fact that Mr. Parquette (bkparque) repeatedly proclaimed authorship of it (while impersonating me and obnoxiously arguing with world class physics authorities): Readers may draw their own conclusions regarding the selectively worded content and import of Mr. Parquette's self-revealing transmission. Best regards, - Kaiduorkhon (RascalPuff, AKA, Kent Benjamin Robertson) __________________________ Post Script (after-thought): In his epithet hurling post, proclaiming: 'Now you're going to have to do your own work', the onerous Mr. Brian Kirk Parquette (bkparque) neglects ('forgets'), that consists of having (in the past 45+ years): 1. Discovering that Newton's gravity is Einstein's 4th dimension. 2. Reinstating Einstein's formerly abandoned Cosmological Constant (Lambda /\). 3. Reinstating the formerly abandoned Steady State Theory. 3. Identifying electricity as the 5th dimension. 4. Identifying magnetism as the 6th dimension. 5. Predicting that 'Hubble's expanding universe' is accelerating. 6. Demystifying and conceptually explaining 'time dilation'. 7. Non mathematically explaining the unification of space and time to 'space-time'. 8. Non mathematically explaining the 'curvature of space-time'. 9. Presenting & translating Einstein's Special and General Relativity comprehensible, w'out mathematics. 10. Conceptually explaining the causal identity of black holes. 11. Conceptually explaining the Lorentz contraction of physical matter. 12. Presenting the sound and sight of 4-dimensional gravity. 13. Making Einstein's Unified Field comprehensible to Martin Gardner's Millions. 14. Presenting and popularising the 20th Century counterpart for the revolutionary Copernican Heliocentric Theory. 15. Explaining that the velocity of light - C - is covariant with the coordinate system from which it originates and with which it is associated 16. Explaining that 'nuclear resinal forces' are earlier moments in the 4-D space-time continuum. 17. Making the 4-D space-time continuum non mathematically comprehensible to the average high school student. It seems that the precipitating Mr. Brian Kirk Parquette - among others - has dropped a few things out of his impotently red-faced, vituperous diatribe and revilement, regarding Mr. Kent Benjamin Robertson's (RascalPuff's, Kaiduorkhon's) unprecedented contributions to human knowledge on the subject of gravity. http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie 6. ### GuestGuest Advertisement to hide all adverts. 7. ### KaiduorkhonRegistered Senior Member Messages: 552 TOTAL FIELD THEORY: Reinstatement of Lambda CC Copyright 1979 & 2009 by Robby Robertson. All rights reserved. May be used for non commercial educational and recreational purposes with the stipulation that proper accreditation is extended to the author. For more cost free rhythm and reason, please consider a season that resonantly sings beyond theories of strings. From Euclid's straight line shine to Isaac's golden apple and its geodesic grapple. A catchy little tune that most anyone can croon, by the curved silvery light of Albert's expeditionary moon. Dr. Einstein's waking inspiration may yet sweep the sleeping nation at the slightest provocation. An unrecognized solution that could start a peaceful revolution. Big Bang Gangology’s further confirmation of their favorite libation - more denial and debate with the orphaned Steady State. Behold Albert's resurrected Lambda smart bomb with enduring aplomb. Benevolent bomb leaves all the buildings and people intact; takes 4-D space-time to get them back on track. Asked the teacher what gravity was, an' all he said is what gravity does. Said I wanna know why, not how things fall. Teacher said nobody knows that one at all. Asked the people on the 6 O'Clock news; they said on that we have no views. Same thing happened in a physics lesson - a picture of Newton gave a puzzled expression. Still wanted to know what gravity is, so I went outside and continued the quiz. Asked a mathematician and he took all day saying gravity is numbers. So I lit one up and, went into suspension, tintanambulating beyond the 3rd dimension. The answer appeared as a gentle kiss, so I wrote another poem and it goes like this... A Brief History of Rhyme - A Celebration of Space-Time Almalgamation Liberated From extended Fragmentation (The dreaded thread) Poetic science appliance. The exclusion of politics from science. A scientific paradigm shift alliance. Einstein's presently abandoned Unified Field reinstated w'out mathematics. Scientific 'mainstream' panics at the joining of Einstein's field with Planck's quantum mechanics Democritus foresaw the invisible atom, but since then his discovery is found with substratrum. From antiquity, and ubiquity the continuous wave was the rave. Faraday found the cathode ray. Thompson uncovered electrons one day. Rutherford encountered protons a different way. Understood Maxwell's waves beneath the celestial hood, discovered electromagnetic fields as no one thought he would. The wave emitting electron could not be subdivided - at first it was whispered, then openly confided. Yet along came smaller mysterious articles, of Max Planck’s curiously indivisible 'particles' : Transforming a mystic world of electrostatics into a truculent tangle of quantum mechanics. Conceptual doors were opened for the entrance of protons, but no comprehensive vacancy for the residential photons. Other atomic tenants varied in weight, height and disguise, but the photon is always the same null value and size. A deteriorating atom might change its balance or valence, while the unchanging photon showed no such talents. Vigils are kept to find it changing its station, while its stubborn identity confirms in black body radiation. At dollar conventions where no change is invited, twenty nickels sit down to an audience excited. The quantum takes for granted inclusion, while greenbacks resent the currency intrusion. To and from spherical shells the electron darts - while the unchanged quantum arrives before it departs. If you’re looking for a message in here, it’s of Max Planck’s quanta and Niels Bohr’s spheres. Invincible in principle, Newton’s Mechanics are sure as shooting, while quantum mechanics are robbing and looting. Evolutionary experiments are eclectic, but the final conclusions are photo-electric. As though these convulusions are not enough, reality panned out some other stuff. The only certain universal permanancy, is Einstein’s constant light-speed and Heisenberg’s indeterminacy. Einstein’s fort was special & general relativity, while his Nobel Prize was for photo-electricity. Uncle Albert having firstly proven to be right - ahead of Brownian motion and the speed of light. This century old issue of size is how Einstein won the Nobel Prize - how the peace loving master-blaster stayed alive, in the timely year of 1905. Anaxgoras of pre biblical days took big and little to greater heights and stays, he said "There’s always something larger than large, and always something smaller than small." Perhaps the smallest-large statement of all. May this admonition of illusion be this brief sonnet’s conclusion. The 20th century path has been rough - to the point of surrendering enough of this stuff. Though this ballad may be spiritual or mental, any semblance to education is purely coincidental. Readers are invited to this paragon of camp, may the poetic winner be rewarded with writer's cramp? Whoever may think that here is no thought, please feel free to continue and give yer best shot. http://www.toequest.com/forum/toeth...mological-constant-steady-state-theories.html 8. ### Fraggle RockerStaff Member Messages: 24,690 * * * * NOTE FROM A MODERATOR (but not the Moderator of this board) * * * * Since this is so important to you, I assume that you have retained an attorney to deal with it. What does he say? I don't see how posting this information here is going to help you, unless it's what your attorney told you to do. 9. ### KaiduorkhonRegistered Senior Member Messages: 552 Dear Fraggle Rocker: After conference with several attorneys I have learned that cost of actionable response is prohibitive, due to my disability status on a fixed income. There is a history of taunts and mockery, regarding the post at point - including the jeering suggestion that I 'take the issue to a judge' and let it be determined therewith who is the author of the work at point. Since its history transcends the very age of the interloper(s); entails dozens of multilingual copyrights and hundreds of thousands of international witnesses it is much more expedient and circumstantially appropriate to simply intercept - and hold to public account - the antagonist(s), on the same medium (namely the internet) he (they) abused in attempting to displace my authorship. Certainly Mr. Brian Kirk Parquette - or any other contention - has the option of employing an attorney to represent him, in any differences he may have with Truly Yours. http://www.toequest.com/forum/toeth...mological-constant-steady-state-theories.html Last edited: Feb 21, 2010 10. ### kurrosRegistered Senior Member Messages: 793 Is the BenTheMan who appears in that link the same we have here? Coz that would amuse me Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! . 11. ### Fraggle RockerStaff Member Messages: 24,690 I think it's much more likely that BenTheMan will know the answer to that question. Why don't you ask him? I didn't read the stuff in enough detail to come across his name. 12. ### S.A.M.uniquely dreadfulValued Senior Member Messages: 72,824 I also did not read it in detail, but authorship of any work which is debated is established by proving prior publication [which is not necessarily proof since prior publication does not eliminate the possibility that ideas were stolen, however it is the only means available in peer review] If you can prove prior publication, that should address your difficulties 13. ### KaiduorkhonRegistered Senior Member Messages: 552 Dear Sam: Please take note of the first post in this thread. 14. ### S.A.M.uniquely dreadfulValued Senior Member Messages: 72,824 I don't know anything about physics. So I have no clue what you are talking about. All I could figure out is that someone with your permission posted bits of your work on the internet but did not give you credit for it. Its a dicey matter, in that the internet is not considered a scientific publication. And you did give him permission to post the stuff and if the website has no rules on plagiarism [or has an admin who believes that if you quote someone else's words, you own them], then you have no respite What you could do is ask the webmasters of the site to remove the posts but since you gave the poster permission to post your work, they are not obliged to do so. 15. ### KaiduorkhonRegistered Senior Member Messages: 552 Dear Sam: The first post of this thread clarifies that the work at point is historically published, distributed and sold out internationally in tens of thousands of hard copy essays and books, decades before there was an internet. The world renowned Portola Institute's Whole Earth Catalogue advertised and sold it internationally in 1970. http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html Last edited: Feb 22, 2010 16. ### KaiduorkhonRegistered Senior Member Messages: 552 17. ### WillNeverValued Senior Member Messages: 2,554 So if you already published it before he distributed it, you have your proof that you were the original author. So why are you upset still and what are you trying to prove to us? It would be one thing if you could show that your income was affected by this ordeal, but you appear to be old enough to get social security. 18. ### Fraggle RockerStaff Member Messages: 24,690 Social Security (in the USA) is not enough to live on. Sure, someone who has spent his life being a loser working part-time at minimum wage has developed low expectations, but if that person is even eligible for benefits they probably come out to$300 a month or less.

Anyone who's actually had a decent job and now has a home with a mortgage, a car that is reliable and not embarrassing, and the expectation to have a little fun, entertainment or vacation occasionally, will not be able to live on the Social Security benefits that he accrued at his higher wage level. We all need other income, either from investments, royalties--or wages for the kind of knowledge work we can still do at this age. Having someone rip off our patents and copyrights is not something we take lightly.

19. ### WillNeverValued Senior Member

Messages:
2,554
I realize that, but again, what is its relevance here? Did the person plagiarize on this forum? Or is he going around to every science forum that he knows exists in order to "prove himself" to everyone?

20. ### KaiduorkhonRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
552
Thank you FraggleRocker, and you too, WillNever - your above quoted queries are self-answering statements of the obvious.

Yes. When a plagiarisation attempt is made on the internet, in one, or scores of locations, the attempt to pillage is ostensibly delivered - or accessible - to the world.

Summarily - for the moment and henceforth, as demonstrated here:
'Tracers work both ways'.

The cited, vanquished purloiner, publicly declared himself the author of my work in gravitational physics (Total Field Theory: Gravity is the 4th Dimension: Reinstatement of Abandoned Cosmological Constant: The Big Bang Theory is Wrong): while argumentively denigrating the late Prof. Wheeler (Emeritus, @ Princeton University, and many others), in 'my voice', i.e., in proclaiming himself the author of my work, and speaking on behalf of my work (as though it were his own), he is also publicly and ineradicably emerged as an imposter.

Several of his miscreant computer-Geek-Hacker acolytes have attempted to disintegrate (cover up) Mr. Parquette's trespasses - and my responses to them, yes, all over the net - by displacing original messages and text with quotes from Shakespeare, since, upon learning of Brian Kirk Parquette's (aka, bkparque) tampering, I did tell him that he had as much chance of successfully acquiring credit for my work - if he attempted to take credit for the work of Shakespeare; hence the plethora of Shakespeare quotes, obscuring the (apparently ineradicable) original points and counter-points of skunk fight aromatized posts peppered all over the net.

Enter 'Brian Kirk Parquette' in Google and behold an internet paper trail of blazing lampoons. In hacking out much of the original content and displacing it with Shakespeare quotes, he proved his swift ability to run, while revealing his slapstick inability to hide.

This bruhaugh may yet become the most trafficked skunk fight on the net.

*********************************************

The following URLs provide more of my work, that has yet to be hacked, accompanied by some introductory monologue.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/42821561/Total-Field-Theory

**************************************

**************

The above and below urls are but fragments of culminating world phenomenological trends; the messages therein may not portend the company that you and others keep, but, it is the company that keeps you and others.

The entire world, from eco-systems to academia, science, art and culture, is going south; the following blogs are some narrow beams of light still finding a way through the culminating darkness. One of these blogs is about the abuse of Dr. Brian Greene's sensational 'String Theory', and how it extends far beyond Dr. Greene or his theory, revealing 'a world that cannot scratch itself without becoming entangled in its own web'.

http://milesmathis.com/string.html

Another is about control of information, which is directly related to how 'educational reform' is bearing down upon us like the 'New Math' (which was taught for decades before it summed up its own undoing).

http://milesmathis.com/wiki.html

Of course, anyone who may seriously consider these sources of information is at hazard of perishing beneath a hail of crank stigmatized darts. That - mud-slinging, back biting, rat packing, ostracizing dynamic of character assassination - also, is subjected in the proffered materials.

Then, there are those who would understandably ask, 'Why?' What is to be gained by methodologically mass producing misinformation and crazymaking? What is there to be gained, by whom, for such proposed, contrived dynamics?

The answer is simply, that a higher gross national product is to be gained, by the 'corporate state' (big business): Masses of people in a general state of harmony, consume much less - of everything that there is to be consumed - than do masses of people in a general state of chaos, confusion and fear.

Operant conditioning, neurolinguistic programming, psychomolecular restructuring, behavior modification - brainwashing by any other magnetically exotic, Orwellian NewSpeaking name.

Reality is being dismissed for lack of evidence. It's 'not reality, it crazy-making actuality.'

(*'What difference does it make? Nobody cares. It's always been this way. There's nothing you can do about it.' - Familiar calls to surrender. Give ye up all hoopex, who roll in *herex.)

'Those who are not willing to defend freedom and democracy, are not worthy of enjoying any of it'. - Ben Franklin (paraphrased)

Readers may draw their own conclusions.

Compliments of the *White Mongol Press.
*Subsidiary to Great Continental EuroAsian Green Grass RiverDragon Productions

***********

http://forums.delphiforums.com/mollyspup/messages/?msg=2.1

TV THAT WATCHES YOU

**************

http://forums.delphiforums.com/DemureDragon/messages/?msg=2.1

HAPPY NEW YEAR: 1968

*************

http://forums.delphiforums.com/charlie1968/messages/?msg=3.1

Old Spice & Napalm - Hollywood & Vietnam

****************

WAG THE POODLE
______________________________________________

http://forums.delphiforums.com/waboose2/

Butterfly, Owl & Eagle: Athena Marie Prima

************

http://forums.delphiforums.com/subedai/messages/?msg=1.1

NOMADS, CIVILIZATION & WAR: The Hinges of History

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Vanquishing Toxic Rumors & Shams

http://forums.delphiforums.com/temujin1/messages

-------------------------------

Report from Veterans of Foreign Wars - Bill Motto - Post 5888

http://open.salon.com/blog/kaidu/2010/04/25/report_from_vfw_-_bill_motto_-_post_5888

---------------------------------

Einstein's 'biggest blunder' was Right After All

( A skunk fight with a rosey ending )

http://www.toequest.com/forum/toe-t...o-called-biggest-blunder-right-after-all.html

*******************************************

http://www.scribd.com/doc/42821561/Total-Field-Theory
**************************************

Parquette - an obelisk paragon of veracity - also alternately proclaims that 'someone else' wrote KBR's work, and that he (Parquette) can prove KBR stole it! Because he 'knows THE REAL AUTHOR!' Parquette doesn't name the title of the book or the name of the author he's squawking about.

In other posts, such as that in response to Dr. Eliot McGucken (enter in Google), Parquette identifies himself as the 'Author' of KBR's book, and impersonates KBR in a communication with Dr. McGucken.

The contrast in Mr. Parquette's self contradictory claims are accented furthermore by his bad Navy discharge and frequent siezures of proclaiming KBR to be schizophrenic and variously name-calling KBR as a threat to children; whereas Mr. Parquette has a history of being restrained from visiting his own child, even under supervision: while KBR has a four year history of distinguished active military - including combat zone - service, and no record beyond misdemeanors.

Perhaps Mr. Parquette fancys himself as an outstanding internet sensation, via the creation of a theater of abrasive association - as KBR's 'nemesis' ('worthy opponent'). Such methods are several notches beneath the public relations techniques practiced by misanthropes who carry out violent crimes projected on quasi-celebrated people or works.

Bkparque - a legend in is own crimes - has placed himself on a Mobius Strip loop on the net: out to prove that he's someone else, somewhere else, doing something else. Spends his spare time laundering his mouth with 20 Mule Team Borax and nitric acid.

Readers may expect more from he and his self-imprisoned - pasture pie (frisbee?) slinging - cronies, who are out to prove that two wrongs don't make a right, while three or more do.

We may only wish them continued success at what they do best.

Best regards
- KBR (aka, Kaiduorkhon)

21. ### WillNeverValued Senior Member

Messages:
2,554
I get that you don't like this Parquette guy, and I don't like plagiarism either, but you didn't say why you are posting this rant on sciforums.

Did this person plagiarize here?

It sounds like you are trying to drag his name through the mud. You might have been disrespected, but it probably isn't okay to visit that disrespect onto other forums by using them as vehicles to advance your crusade against this person.

From the looks of this post, it sounds like your issue with this person has escalated WAY beyond the realm of academic dishonesty. As well, the 3rd person self-references make you look rather unhinged.

Last edited: Mar 27, 2011
22. ### chimpkinC'mon, get happy!Registered Senior Member

Messages:
4,416
*Chimpkin holds up three brass door hinges speculatively*
"I wondered where these came from. I tripped over them in the pseudoscience forums."
*Chimpkin hands over hinges*
"I think somebody lost these, possibly a long time ago."

Last edited: Mar 27, 2011
23. ### KaiduorkhonRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
552
**********************

Dear WillNever:

Although academic and political ethics are indeed an issue here, the manifest intention of this thread is to communicate a historically suppressed work, based on - and directly referring to - the works of others.

'My work' authenticates itself in the re-cognition of what was and is already known, but unrecognized and/or disqualified for untenable reasons. Having been described as someone who is attempting to 'disqualify Einstein', and/or 'replace Einstein', I often refer to myself 'in the third person' as 'the World's #1 Einstein Groupie', to deter any honest or devious misunderstandings.

Indeed, I do have numerous 3rd person pen names, particularly because my divorced mother was Chinese (Sami) Mongol, the culture of which traditionally affords names other than conventional surnames - also, because Mom married 'the only (North American Native American) Indian in town', who was of course my stepfather, and, again, of a culture that traditionally proffers multiple names. Ostensibly, anyone who accesses the provided urls is provided with my conventional first, middle and last name. Moreover, depending on the subjected issue, I often choose to linguistically distance myself from grotesque innuendos and implied allegations.

I cannot read your mind but expect that you apprehend a motive of 'self-promotion' on my part, rather than a motive of duty to access anyone in the world - at no cost - who wishes an opportunity to evaluate and constructively critisize or otherwise comment upon an unprecedented non-mathematical approach to Einstein's Special & General Relativity, and (presently abandoned) reinstated Unified Field. I did not foreordain or otherwise 'plan' to become the author of Einstein's work w'out mathematics.

Truly Yours also did not anticipate what has manifest as (elaborate) plagiarisation of many of my other published works - hence my provision of access via the corresponding urls, most of which are germane to SciForums, and all of which have been hacked and required restoration or replacement.

Neither did I foresee what has proven to be off-topic and deliterious attacks on my personage. Between December 03 and September 04, an entire hate-site entitled 'WhyKBRsucks' was posted on the web, featuring a host who was positively identified and court ordered to remove it, after eight months of actively describing me as a murderer, a danger to women and children, and someone who has been arrested for 'marijuana cultivation', 'possession of unregistered firearm', 'illegal discharge of firearm in city limits', 'welfare fraud' (I am 100% disabled by federal standards), and statements from anonymous persons spelling out Brian Parquette's name and that he (Parquette) is going to file a law suit against me (for documenting his described trespasses on the net: documentation still in my possession as evidence).

Referencing your statements that 'it sounds like you are trying to drag his name through the mud', and your admonition that it may not be appropriate to utilize this forum with that motivation... You or anyone who enters the issued antagonist's name (or 'Gravity is the 4th Dimension') in Google and pursues the numerous posts will inevitably witness that what 'impropriety' there may be on my part is simply a (conservative and restrained, understated) reflection of what bkparque has irrevocably and abundantly scattered over the net. He and his acolytes have a particularly peculiar penchant for attacking the groin.

Neither is this any kind of vendetta as you imply. Whereas, it is simply a matter of self defense, as well as a public service cautionary.

"From the looks of this post, it sounds like your issue with this person has escalated WAY beyond the realm of academic dishonesty." - WillNever

You certainly are right about that, sir...

'This person' (is invited to 'sue me') was a key subject, alluded to favorably by - literally - hundreds of anonymous persons manifest on the described (outlawed) hate-site, via the internet medium. Since the emergence and disintegration of that cite, new laws are now on the books that will fine and jail individuals and groups for doing what was 'not illegal', then.

Sincerely,
Kent Benjamin Robertson (aka, KBR, etceteras)