Then I suggest you call them "free thinkers" or something similar, not "gnostic Christians". Because, obviously, radical Muslims are not the same as gnostic Christians. If I suggested you read the entire encyclopedia from start to finish, would you do that just to learn the definition of one word? I do take the time to educate myself seriously, so I prefer not to waste it on things that aren't relevant. Whether I personally agree with it (I do) is irrelevant, because "what goes as "unethical" seems to be quite subjective, especially if you compare the more fundamental and/or extremist branches of the various religions." Not relevant anymore, because I agreed. How does me not showing my moral thinking, or lack of it, make your arguments and statements any better or worse?